Better Simple Strategy Review
Frank Luong
Techpreneur. Technology, Product & Business strategist. Passionate about helping people, teams & organizations to have a big, positive impact on the world through development of new tech
Ever wondered what strategies make Apple, Amazon, and other juggernauts so successful? We read the book Better, Simpler Strategy by Felix Oberholzer-Gee and will share the top insights he uncovered that explain how top companies succeed.
You'll learn the value stick framework to raise a customer's willingness to pay and lower an employee's willingness to sell, how customers and employees contribute to value incentives, how to build value maps to compare against your competitors, and how companies like Amazon, Apple, Ford and Nike prioritize the right value drivers to grow their business.?
TOP 20 INSIGHTS
SUMMARY
Over the past few decades, strategy has become increasingly sophisticated. However, only a few companies manage to translate strategy into enduring financial success. Too often, strategic planning becomes an annual ritual. The Value-Based Strategy approach cuts through complexity and clarifies where to focus and how to deepen competitive advantage.?
THE VALUE STICK
A Value Stick visually represents the Value-Based Strategy approach with four components: Willingness to pay (WTP), Willingness to sell (WTS), Price and Cost.
The value stick is a simple and powerful tool to understand value creation and value capture. The stick provides the customer's maximum willingness to pay on top, followed by product price, cost and finally, the employee's willingness to sell at the bottom.
WILLINGNESS TO PAY
WTP represents the most a customer would pay for your product or service. If companies improve their product, the WTP will increase.
WILLINGNESS TO SELL
WTS is based on employee and supplier perceptions. For employees, WTS is the minimum compensation they require to accept a job offer. If companies make work more attractive, WTS reduces. If a job is dangerous or exceptionally demanding, WTS increases.
For suppliers, WTS is the lowest price at which they will offer products and services. If companies make it easier for suppliers to produce and ship products, WTS will decline. Think of WTP and WTS as walk-away points.
The difference between WTP and WTS is "Value" for the customer. The difference between compensation and WTS is "employee satisfaction." Finally, the difference between prices and cost is the value captured by the firm. Draw value sticks for specific products and specific customer and employee groups.
VALUE CREATION AND CAPTURE
The total value created by a company is the difference between its WTP and WTS. Strategies that lead to exceptional performance use three levers to produce differentiated value:
There are only two ways to create additional value: increase WTP or lower WTS. Every significant initiative must either enhance customer experience (raise WTP) or make it more attractive for vendors or employees to work with you (lower WTS).
STRATEGISTS THINK IN DIFFERENCES.
A company's ability to capture created value depends on its ability to create differentiated value. The higher the similarity between your firm and your competitors, the more customers will focus on price, which will create pressure on the firm's margins.
Many passengers choose which budget airline to fly solely based on ticket prices. Price competition puts pressure on margins and reduces a firm's ability to capture value.
Companies with a sustained competitive advantage raise WTP or lower WTS in ways that competitors find hard to replicate. Apple significantly raises WTP with unique products which are radically different from their competitors.
CREATE CUSTOMER DELIGHT
WTP is influenced by the product, its associations, the status they confer, the joy they bring and the social considerations they cause. While a product-centric manager focuses on purchasing decisions and ways to sway the customer, WTP attempts to increase customer delight throughout the customer journey. Develop practices to periodically remind the entire team of the firm's focus on WTP.
IMPROVE WTP ACROSS THE CONSUMER JOURNEY
Amazon entered the billion-dollar e-reader market dominated by Sony's Librie. Sony had a great product, a first-mover advantage, dominant market share and a big marketing budget. Despite these advantages, Amazon won a 62% market share within just five years. Amazon won because it offered free 3G internet access, which enabled users to instantly download e-books, while Sony users had to rely on computers. The product-centric Sony focussed only on a great reading experience which it knew would influence the customer's purchase decision. Amazon, in contrast, focussed on WTP and improved convenience across the customer journey.
FOCUS ON NEAR CUSTOMERS
Companies are familiar with their customers and know about consumers of rival firms. But often, they ignore potential customers who are not currently active in the market but may be interested. Near-customers are the segment whose WTP is slightly below the level required to make a purchase. Understanding this group's value drivers can unlock significant business opportunities. Ask yourself why near customers don't buy your product and how you can tweak your product to boost their WTP and make them buyers.
TAOBAO BEATS EBAY
Taobao, a small Chinese startup launched by Jack Ma, took on a dominant eBay, which had an 85% market share with a focus on near-customers who wanted to shop online but were cautious to make a purchase. Taobao provided an escrow service, Alipay, to ensure customers paid only after sellers shipped a product. A second key feature was WangWang, an instant message service that allowed buyers to bargain with sellers. Finally, Taobao's website visually resembled a brick-and-mortar store to create familiarity. Taobao's group of near-customers grew far faster than eBay's customers. Taobao had an 84% market share within four years.
WIN WITH COMPLEMENTS
Without complements, the WTP of many products would be zero. Think of smartphones without any apps. Complements can be particularly powerful if they raise your WTP and not those of your competitors. Tesla Superchargers initially supplied power only to Tesla cars.
Exclusivity is a tricky choice. Ask yourself if you seek to gain the most if you grow your market share or grow the category overall. To grow market share, keep complements exclusive. To benefit from category growth, go for non-proprietary industry-standard complements. To discover complements, ask yourself what customers do before they interact with your business and how you can reduce friction there.
COOPERATION AND CONFLICT
Whenever the price of a complement declines, the WTP for the other product increases. Because apps are cheap, customers are happy to spend more on smartphones. While partners jointly create complimentary value, they often compete on how to share that value. Spotify works hard to promote new songwriters but simultaneously pushes hard to reduce their royalties. There is more at stake in negotiations than a simple supplier negotiation. When you lower the price of a complement, not only do you get a discount, you also see an increase in the WTP of a product.
CREATE PROFIT POOLS
Companies that make their own complimentary services can shift profits from one product to another. Gillette gives away its "core product," the razor, in return for substantial margins on the complementary product blades. Microsoft barely makes money from consoles. When the competition heats up, they can drop product prices and raise WTP of complements to protect overall margins.
Apple kept the price of music and apps low to generate exceptional margins on the sale of iPods, iPads and iPhones. Over time, Apple's gross margins on the iPhone fell from an estimated 62% to 38% between 2009 and 2018 due to intense competition from Android Phones. However, Apple grew its gross profit from an average app by four times in the same period. In a dramatic strategic move, Apple shifted its profit pool away from hardware to software.
领英推荐
NETWORK EFFECTS AND TIPPING POINTS
In markets with strong network effects, customer WTP rises as the adoption of the product increases. Network effects can lead to tipping points, from low adoption to universal acceptance in a short period. In 2010, mobile payments had not taken off in China. Within a decade, three-quarters of the Chinese population prefers mobile payments to cash, and many retailers have stopped cash entirely.
TYPES OF NETWORK EFFECTS
There are three types of network effects:?
Network Effects can provide formidable advantages, and markets often tip in favor of a few companies. However, many network effects are bound by geography. Uber has 3 million drivers globally but still has to compete in every new market it enters. Regional network effects create powerful first-mover advantages. Once DiDi grew in China, Uber stood no chance even though it was a global behemoth.?
HOW SMALLER FIRMS CAN COMPETE
Small firms can compete effectively in three ways:
VALUE FOR EMPLOYEES
Employee satisfaction is the difference between their compensation and their willingness to sell. Firms can improve satisfaction with increased compensation or lowered WTS to make work more attractive. However, there are essential differences between both approaches.
Increased compensation lowers margins and merely redistributes value. But more attractive work conditions create more value as they reduce WTS, the minimum compensation for which an employee will work. The firm can share a part of this value with employees and use the rest to increase margins.
Making work more attractive goes beyond process optimization to include everything from food choices to tone of feedback to even commute. Companies that lower WTS can capture a part of the value they create through below-market compensation, greater loyalty and engagement and an increased pool of applicants. To be competitive in the talent market, companies don't necessarily have to match market compensation levels. They have to create as much value for employees, which is the difference between compensation and WTS as their competitors. If the drop in WTS is more significant than the cut in salaries, both company and employees are better off.
SUPPLY CHAINS
Companies want to increase margins and pay suppliers less, and suppliers seek to enlarge their surplus. These bargaining efforts are zero-sum games that create no value. All gain comes at the expense of the other party.
However, if you manage to decrease the WTS of suppliers, more value is created, and both your company and suppliers can be better off. The relationship between the company and supplier determines WTS. If a supplier gains prestige by working with a company, WTS is lower. To lower WTS and create more value, teach your suppliers to be more productive is an effective way to lower WTS and create more. Nike enabled its suppliers to adopt lean manufacturing, and the resultant productivity advances lowered WTS and increased margins simultaneously.
THE WORLD'S CHEAPEST CAR
Sometimes changes in WTS occur from changes in the company's approach to suppliers. Many buyers are overly prescriptive in their demands of suppliers. But over-specification robs suppliers of the opportunity to adopt novel processes and introduce innovative products and services. When Tata Motors set out to design the world's least expensive car, it asked Bosch Automotive to design the engine. However, they gave no rulebooks or specifications. They merely mentioned the design constraints and cost goals and allowed Bosch to find innovative ways to achieve them. Bosch's technical breakthroughs found their way into multiple Tata engines.
PRODUCTIVITY
Advances in productivity lower cost and willingness to sell at the same time. Companies have considerable opportunities to improve productivity, which lowers both costs and WTS. The productivity gap between the top 10% of companies and the bottom 10% of companies is stunning. A US company in the 90th percentile is twice as productive as a company in the 10th percentile. In China and India, top performers produce five times as many products as the least efficient companies.
There are three ways to improve productivity:
1. SCALE
In some industries with fixed costs, companies benefit from economies of scale. In such an industry, you must know your Minimum Efficient Scale (MES), the volume required to be cost-competitive. Below MES, you will not be able to compete with larger rivals. Once you achieve MES, continued growth no longer results in a more significant cost advantage.
2. LEARNING
As companies increase production volumes, costs decline because employees gain familiarity with products and processes and find new ways to improve productivity. By 1926, the cost of manufacturing a Ford Model T had dropped to $840 — from $1300 in 1909. This price drop was despite a threefold rise in wages for workers. Learning alone had dropped costs by nearly one-third. Learning not only improves productivity but can also improve WTP in some contexts.
A surgeon at Indian hospital group Narayana Health performs nearly 200 open-heart surgeries annually, nearly twice as much as a doctor in Cleveland Clinic. The high volumes reduce cost and improve quality. Narayana Health's success rates rival the very best hospitals in the West. AI and machine learning have renewed interest in learning as a source of competitive advantage.
However, there is a dark side to learning. An excessive focus on process optimization can lead to a deep intertwining of product and process. Innovation gets stifled as it becomes too costly to make significant changes. Ford's learning effects meant that it had to wait nearly two decades before it could implement important product innovation.
3. OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
High-quality management practices and operational effectiveness help create meaningful differentiation between companies. Contrary to conventional management wisdom, management best practices are difficult for competitors to imitate and serve as a basis for long-term competitive advantage. Operational effectiveness and strategy are intertwined, and companies must not pay importance to this distinction. Instead, they should consider if they have the potential to raise WTP or lower WTS.
VALUE MAPS
A value map is an excellent tool to visualize critical strategic opportunities and tradeoffs. To build a value map, select your target customer group and use data-driven surveys to rank value drivers, the core list of criteria that customers value in the order of importance. Finally, on a scale of one to ten, indicate how good your company is in meeting each value driver. Create this map for your organization and see which value drivers you could use to improve WTP.
A company's ability to capture value depends entirely on differences in WTP or WTS compared to competitors. Compare your company's value map to your competitors' value propositions to identify critical differences and devise ways to heighten them. Choose a coherent group of value drivers that help customers achieve similar objectives also differentiate your product from the competition.
Remember, to improve performance on any value driver, organizations must deprioritize another value driver. Resources are scarce and must be allocated to ensure excellence in a few core areas. It's far harder to determine where not to invest and where to underperform. At every strategy meeting, teams must ask themselves, what will we stop doing to ensure that we execute on our key priorities. Once you decide which value drivers to strengthen and which ones to deprioritize, strategic implementation follows naturally.
CREATE COMPETITIVE DIFFERENTIATION
Compare your company's value curve with your competitors' value propositions to identify relevant differences and find ways to heighten them. Organizations should choose a set of related value drivers as a theme that help their customers achieve similar objectives. Your theme must help differentiate your product from competitors.?
You can also use value maps to understand lower employee WTS. If your company depends on critical suppliers, you can create value maps for those relationships as well.
IMPROVE BOTH WTP AND WTS
Organizations can improve WTP and lower WTS simultaneously if both sets of value drivers are naturally connected. Malls give Apple a discount (lower WTS) because it attracts many shoppers (higher WTP). Doctors at Narayana Health perform more surgeries, which improves quality (higher WTP) and raises productivity (lower WTS). In services, employee satisfaction and customer experience are deeply interlinked. To create dual advantages, focus on connections that lead from one set of value drivers to others.
To get the strategy conversation started in your team, take a piece of paper, draw a value stick and ask three simple questions: What do we do to change WTP? How do we change WTS? What are the connections between our value drivers, prices and costs? The key to organizational growth is a relentless focus on value creation. The value-based approach enables your company's core purpose: create more value for customers, employees, suppliers and shareholders.