When it comes to defining project specifications, clear and precise requirements are paramount for success. However, there are common pitfalls that should be avoided to ensure the clarity and effectiveness of requirements documentation. In this article, we'll explore some key practices to follow when writing requirements.
- Avoid Vague Terminology: One of the most crucial aspects of writing requirements is clarity. Using vague terms such as "usually, often, typically, generally, user-friendly, versatile, flexible, reliable, and upgradeable" can introduce ambiguity and confusion. Instead, strive for specificity and clarity in your language to ensure everyone understands the requirements in the same way.
- Avoid Compound Requirements: It's essential to keep requirements focused and concise. Avoid the temptation to combine multiple requirements into one, often indicated by the use of the word "and." This practice can lead to confusion and difficulty in implementation. Each requirement should address a single, specific aspect of the project to maintain clarity and manageability.
- Eliminate Conditional Clauses: Conditional clauses like "if that should be necessary" can introduce uncertainty and ambiguity into requirements. Instead of leaving room for interpretation, clearly define the conditions and criteria under which each requirement should be met. This helps to avoid confusion and ensures that stakeholders have a clear understanding of what is expected.
- Steer Clear of Wishful Thinking: While it's natural to aspire to perfection, it's essential to be realistic when setting requirements. Avoid wishful thinking by refraining from setting unrealistic expectations, such as achieving 100% reliability, compatibility with all platforms, universal user satisfaction, or the ability to handle all unexpected failures. Setting achievable goals helps to maintain project feasibility and manage stakeholders' expectations effectively.
In the end, clear requirements facilitate communication between stakeholders, guide development efforts, and ultimately contribute to the success of the project. So, next time you're writing requirements, remember to avoid vague terminology.
Source: The Requirements Engineering Handbook-Ralph R. Young
Functional Safety || Powertrain Calibration || Diagnostics
8 个月This is also a good, free resource from IBM: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSYQBZ_9.5.2/com.ibm.doors.requirements.doc/topics/get_it_right_the_first_time.pdf
Functional Safety || Powertrain Calibration || Diagnostics
8 个月I'd also highly recommend this book: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Requirements-Engineering-Fundamentals-Professional-Foundation/dp/193753877X This is the offical study guide as part of the International Engineering Requirement Board (IREB) Foundation Certificate. It's a really written, easy to digest book that I always recommend to anyone involved in requirements authoring.
Senior Consultant, Managing Member at Wheatland Consulting, LLC.; Chair of the INCOSE Requirements Working Group (RWG).
8 个月The characteristics of well-formed need and requirement statements and a comprehensive set of rules the help achieve those characteristics can be found in the #INCOSE Guide to Writing Requirements (#GtWR) available in the #INCOSESTORE.