To Beacon, or Not To Beacon? Five Reasons to Hang on to Your Wi-Fi

To Beacon, or Not To Beacon? Five Reasons to Hang on to Your Wi-Fi

Several weeks ago, I attended Beacon Week in San Francisco and was pleasantly surprised by the high interest level. It was also interesting to see the extent of attendee concern about outstanding issues they grapple with related to Beacons.

As the name suggests, beacons are devices?? that send out Bluetooth low energy (BLE) broadcast messages. Beacons by themselves don’t do any sensing or tracking, they can be thought of simply as markers you’d find on a road. They can be placed around a venue or store to mark a location. An application installed on a smartphone can pick up these digital markers, and often times with the help of a backend server, it may be able to convert the digits to something meaningful like a coupon or to check in to a location. With help from beacons, a mobile app can be built to engage the end user to bridge the digital and physical buying process.

 Gartner analyst Mike McGuire said in a recent blog post, “Beacons have been presented to the world as a cool new implementation of Bluetooth radio technology . . . there are two important (potential) benefits — the ability for a customer to come in range and receive product information or maybe even get a coupon or discount, and the ability to provide a grid of sensors to measure store traffic flow, footfalls etc.” 

Although beacon technology is widely available today, technology and hardware-related limitations, along with a lack of tangible results, pose challenges for adoption and reaching marketing potential.

First, consumers must have downloaded the relevant retailer, brand, or team app so that beacons can communicate with the device. (This also means the organization needs to develop the mobile app.)  In his post, McGuire paints a clear picture of where the readiness falls short as he describes his own (lack of a) beacon experience at Apple and Macy’s stores. “It was my bad. I needed to get a separate third-party app, Shopkick, to actually use the beacons. Macy’s own iOS app doesn’t recognize beacons.  Or if it does, they’ve managed to keep that hidden.”

Then, there’s finding the right frequency and content for pushed messages. In a recent Internet Retailer article “The buzz on beacons,” Sheryl Kingstone with IT research firm Yankee 451 Group explains that data on consumer adoption of beacons is scant and the number of consumers actually accepting beacon messages is very small. Once the needed app is downloaded, between 5% and 50% of consumers will open push notifications, depending on the message.

 Thankfully, beacons are not the only way to learn about and engage mobile consumers.

 Five Reasons to Marry Beacons and Wi-Fi

The widespread adoption of mobile devices has also opened doors for unprecedented consumer and marketing benefits to be derived from Wi-Fi.  Wi-Fi-based location analytics have two prevalent consumer use cases:

  • First, location analytics, which uses advanced data mining configured for a specific business, estimates the number of visitors, how much time they spend in your location, and the frequency of their visits.

  • Then advanced analytics provides knowledge of the customers’ movement patterns while they are in your venue or store, so you can understand the preferred and more appealing locations. This is accomplished without the need to have an application installed on the smartphone, so all customers with a smartphone or wearable device that emits a Wi-Fi signal can be counted.

Beacons and passive Wi-Fi analytics are different and collect information in opposite ways. Beacons activate applications on a smartphone and it’s the smartphone that sends the location information to an aggregation point through, say your LTE data plan. Passive Wi-Fi analytics, on the other hand, collect useful data about an environment, such as the behavior of foot traffic using the existing store Wi-Fi infrastructure. Both beacons and Wi-Fi offer value and are complementary.  The combination of the two can provide for comprehensive analytics and customer engagement to both improve operations and boost sales and loyalty.

When you combine beacons and Wi-Fi technology – then add location analytics – you can use a single infrastructure to enable both analytics AND relevant personalized messaging. Major access point manufacturers are teaming with location analytics companies such as Kiana to offer hybrid Wi-Fi / BLE solutions to address beacon shortcomings and enable proximity marketing.

There are many reasons this hybrid model will be a key trend in 2016 and beyond. Wi-Fi-based location analytics make customer engagement a grounded reality. Here’s why: 

  1. Device Readiness – Beacons only work on certain devices and without an open standard there is potential for “land grab” where beacons will work only with certain OSs, such as Apple or Android. Wi-Fi technology is readily available in most parts of the world and can already be used with most Wi-Fi hardware to detect ALL Wi-Fi enabled devices, including smartphones, tablets and wearables. It’s also comparatively inexpensive.

  2. Battery Challenges – Beacons are simple devices with a short battery life needing replacement at some point each year (however, kontakt.io is working on a beacon battery with a three-year life). Finding where beacons are installed and changing 1,000+ batteries is an overwhelming exercise. There are no batteries required for Wi-Fi!

  3. App Reliance – Messages can’t be delivered to consumers unless they have downloaded an app and have allowed notifications, posing headaches for retailers seeking to run effective LBS campaigns. Wi-Fi doesn’t require visitors to open an app or have Bluetooth running. However, it requires a connection to the Internet to transfer data and (in order to interrupt someone with a message) they need to have logged onto the Wi-Fi or given permission in another way.

  4. Costly to Manage & Secure – How do you manage a deployment of 1,100 beacons? What if one stops working, dies, falls off a wall (like at the Brooklyn Museum), or gets moved or stolen, compromising the engagement experience? Beacons still need Wi-Fi or LTE to exist to connect to “mothership.”  

  5. Ad hoc Signals – The ability to pick up a signal from a Beacon varies: walls, doors and other physical objects will shorten signal range (Apple tells us the signals are also affected by water, which means the human body itself could affect the signals). The vast majority of consumers leave their device Wi-Fi turned on, making connectivity more consistent.

So, if your organization simply wants to offer employee connectivity or guest connectivity, Wi-Fi is sufficient. If you want to benefit from location analytics, you’ll want to explore a location-enabled Wi-Fi infrastructure. And, if you’re looking to engage visitors based on where they are in the venue or provide an indoor navigation experience, you might want to look into beacon technology along with apps that provide the two-way communication.

To learn more about Kiana’s Wi-Fi location-based analytics, visit: www.kianaanalytics.com

Abdullah S.

Director of Growth @ Luxor Tech

8 年

Great Article. We at Beeker.us have removed a couple of barriers to widespread adoption of beacons by packaging it as a plug & Play solution. For retailers we provide a Beacons and access to a Beeker Management System which allows them to create their own content/promotions. Customers need to download a single app - the Beeker App. Each store no longer has to create its own app or hire expensive dev resources to integrate their beacons with their mobile app. www.beeeker.us

Jordan Grant

Vice President of Sales, Canada at Temenos

9 年

Hi Nader Fathi, Your article caught my eye as our team at AP1 has recently undertaken projects in creating a hybrid solution for some of our clients. As such, I wanted to point out that you missed some very important facts distinguishing beacons vs. Wi-Fi. 1. Beacons provide higher accuracy in positioning users. 2. Beacons are utilized to generate granular data segmented in zones. 3. Though it is a proprietary solution of AP1, beacons can be customized to generate bluetooth data, without an application tied to it. 4. Beacons provide a much better method to engage users, which you clearly outlined. Wi-Fi analytics is invaluable for most businesses and a hybrid solution is my recommended solution. AP1, with its data partners, are creating a method to marry all data to truly bring big data to clean data (simply visualized in one dashboard).

回复
Devika Girish

B2B SaaS Marketing Leader | Built & Scaled Content & Growth Teams | Ex- OPEN

9 年

I totally agree with what Paul said. While Wi-Fi technology can help businesses track more consumers, as it does not require them to install an app, it is best to choose a technology that gives consumers total control over the data they are giving businesses access to. However, you are definitely spot on about Wi-Fi and beacons working best when they are used together. However, businesses need to take a call on which indoor location technology (Wi-Fi or beacons or NFC or GPS) suits their business by taking into consideration the use case in hand and the various influencing factors in more detail. We have discussed about them in detail here: https://blog.beaconstac.com/2015/07/ibeacon-vs-nfc-vs-gps-which-indoor-location-technology-will-your-business-benefit-from/

回复
Sudip Roy

Client-centric IT Executive - transforming business challenges into impactful, technology-driven solutions

9 年

I concur with Paul Croubalian. Wi-Fi is still non-personal and feels like somebody is snooping on my phone without my permission. Additionally the mobile operating systems are working to block the mac-id's . A combination of wi-fi and beacon can be the future, having only Wi-Fi is non-scalable, and also doesn't add to much value.

回复
Kirk Rhoads

Gyobutsuji Zen Temple Social Media Manager and Board of Directors Member. Activist.

9 年

??????

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nader Fathi的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了