“The Battle Cry of the Wild Child”

“The Battle Cry of the Wild Child”

And again I’ve heard the same old saying from an acquaintance “why can’t you become more docile? Submissive people don’t pose a threat to managers and that will make you more employable”

The answer is simple, I am what society calls a “wild child” and doing that would negate my own nature for the sake of a job. And being a wild child and working with a wild child is not a bad thing. We are not rude or mean, wild children just don’t like to be controlled or “tamed”. An employee-employer relationship is an ongoing conversation and partnership with the "wild child", not a hierachical power trip for the employer.

"Wild children" can become highly productive members of a team when their wilderness is allowed to exist. Here are a few advantages of working alongside a "wild child":

  • You’ll know what the wild child wants and thinks because they will tell you. There are no reasons for the wild child to lie or hide their ambitions. If they want a power position they will make it clear;
  • You’ll know their true opinion about the project. If it’s not going well or just “fine”, they will tell you that, with no fears of repercussions;
  • The wild child is naturally driven and relies a lot on self motivation. The team is going down on work and motivation? Let the "wild child" motivate them;
  • Struggling to find a good answer for a problem? Ask for help, a motivated wild child will move mountains to find the answer;
  • Lack of new ideas? Creativity, thinking outside of the box and trying new approaches is part of the nature of "wild children"


And let's be honest, asking why, demanding answers and thinking outside the box doesn't make someone wild. Lack of control over an employee doesn't make you less of a manager or a director. It makes that wild child a creative and it makes of the employer a leader.

Embrace your inner wilderness :)


Ricardo Castelhano

SVP of Engineering and Country Head @ BedRock Streaming | ex-Peacock / NBCUniversal / Sky | Leadership Coach - INFP-T profile (Opinions are my own)

6 年

I see myself as a "Wild Child" as well (turning 40 you are more of a wild dude). I tried to build a couple companies before trying something different. I loved when I had a good "boss" that were a true servant leader. I saw the difference it makes in a team. Then....I wanted to see a more traditional approach and moved to a super-dupper-traditional company, and I hated to have a boss. After seeing the differences, it was time to jump to the other side of the fence and till today Im trying to be a decent servant leader. There isnt anything better then working with people that truly wants to become better professionals and better persons. Is it difficult to lead "wild childs" ? You bet !!!!! But leading those that dont want to "walk the talk", those that expects to be asked which step they have to take is wayyyyy harder !! Thank goodness the times are changing !!!

Sérgio Saraiva

Senior Engineer Manager

6 年

Existem muitos estilos de lideran?a, e umas pessoas encaixam-se melhor nuns ou noutros. Quem prefere seguran?a sobre liberdade (provavelmente a maioria das pessoas, apesar de quando perguntado dizerem o contrário), terá tendência a preferir ter um manager que as comande, afinal, o risco de falhar é menor (vulgo: só fiz aquilo que me mandaram, logo a culpa n?o é minha). Alguém com um espírito mais criativo naturalmente prefere uma estrutura onde tenha espa?o para apresentar as suas ideias, e por aí em diante. Eu acredito que num mercado onde já existem muitas empresas a fazer o mesmo, com bons níveis de execu??o (e que acabam a competir pelo pre?o mais baixo), pessoas com capacidade de criar coisas novas, fazem a diferen?a. Neste caso o manager deixa de ser um comandante para ser um impulsionador de inteligência, afinal até pode ser a pessoa mais inteligente da equipa, mas n?o será mais inteligente que a agrega??o de todas as inteligências do grupo.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Susana P.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了