THE BASICS OF CRITICAL RACE THEORY
A theory is a way to explain a set of facts. It explains phenomena by connecting the data-dots to form a picture. Different theories connect different data dots differently. Critical race theory (CRT) is one such theory used to explain and understand the phenomenon known as systemic racism. CRT invites us to critically our examine policies, practices, assessment, curriculum, courses, pedagogy, and traditions.
Described here are seven big ideas common to most understandings of CRT:
1. Racism is normal. It is so ingrained in our societal consciousness that most do not see it; however, our brains see racism in the form of implicit bias. As well, our policies, programs, laws, and procedures do. This is systemic racism. For change to occur, we must expose systemic racism as well as that which maintains and perpetuates it.
2. Change occurs only when it aligns with the interests of those in power. In other words, advances for people of color will occur only when it coincides with changing economic conditions and the self-interests of elite whites. Figure 1. contains a list of practices that have not been effective in bringing about the necessary changes for the elimination of systemic racism. The current protests will only be successful when it hits the pocketbooks of those in power or when it threatens the political power of those in power. The hard questions to ask are, who stands to gain in the current system? More simply, who is making money? Who is getting resources? And who is being ignored, dismissed, demeaned, or exploited?
Figure 1. Practices not effective in bringing about social justice and racial equity.
3. Race is a social construct. It has no basis in biology. Race is an arbitrary category based on physical appearance that society has created based around the idea of a mythical white norm. These arbitrary categories become used as a sorting mechanism. This sorting has both material and psychological impacts, creating winners and losers.
4. No person has a single identity. Instead, there is an intersectionality between race and other marginalized groups. These other groups are based on gender, ability, sexual orientation, class, SES, religion, and culture. Understanding oppression and marginalization in one group enables greater understanding of all marginalized groups.
5. All people in a category do not think and act the same. Physical characteristics referred to by racial terms are not indicative of deeper, underlying commonalities or shared traits. This idea of non-essentialism. One famous black person does not speak for all black people. All people’s experiences are different. One person of color should not be asked to be the spokesperson to try to explain systemic racism.
6. The stories of people must be heard. Hearing and honoring the perceptions and experiences of real people is essential in making progress toward social justice and racial equity. However, in education, peoples’ voices are muted in two significant ways. The first occurs through the overreliance on controlled experimental research studies to establish cause-effect relationships. The federal government has determined that this type of research (known as the “gold standard”) is the only legitimate way knowing, thereby de-legitimatizing other forms of scholarship. The result is a distorted picture of the very reality it seeks to portray. For example, a controlled experimental study may demonstrate that a certain practice is effective, but it does not tell you for whom, how, under what circumstance, for what purpose, for how long, and to what degree.
This points to the importance of recognizing qualitative research as legitimate and valued forms of knowing as well as controlled experimental studies. Types of qualitative research include surveys, interviews, observations, ethnographies, grounded theory research, case studies, and historical research methods. These should all be used to fully understand human phenomena. All quantitative data must be considered in their broader contexts.
The second way of disallowing the voices of marginalized groups in education is through the disremembering and misremembering of history. Here, history is described only through the lens of the privileged majority. The histories of marginalized groups are misremembered using cartoonish configurations, distortions, omissions, and blatant misrepresentations. Books that illustrate a more complete remembering include An African American and Latinx History of the United States, (Ortiz, 2018), An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States (Dunbar-Ortiz, (2014), and Caste: The origins of our Discontents, (Wilkerson, 2020). Books like these describe a decidedly different version of U.S. history than the McGraw-Hill version of reality provided in most K-12 curriculums. Here, the atrocities of slavery, the greed of colonization, the avarice of imperialism, and the wanton genocide of indigenous peoples are fully portrayed.
7. Cultural parochialism and white superiority are factors in maintaining systemic racism. A belief that one’s own culture is the correct one to be used as a standard of comparison is called cultural parochialism. Here, practices, customs, lifestyles, traditions, views, and values that do not align with the dominant white culture are deemed to be defective, deviant, or inferior. Thus, right and wrong, good and bad, normal and abnormal are all determined by the majority white culture. This is white superiority. This last idea must be considered as a factor contributing to the perpetuation of systemic racism in special education as well as teacher preparation programs.
References
Blanchett, W. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism. Educational Research, 35 24-28.
Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Kohli, R., Pizarro, M., & Nevarez, A. (2019). The “new racism” of K-12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41, 182-202.
Ortiz, P. (2018). An African American and Latinx History of the United States, Boston, MA: Beacon Press
Tuck, E., & Gorlweski, J. (2016). Racist ordering, settler colonialism, and edTPA: A participatory policy analysis. Educational Policy, 31. 197-217.
Wilkerson, I. (2020). Caste: The origins of our discontents. New York, NY: Random House.
Consulting Engineer: Electrical Engineering; Geomatics; Surveying; Mapping; Battery Management Systems; System Safety
3 年I am beginning to study CRT for myself, rather than expecting its critics to do the work for me. I take note of your Figure 1: "Practices not effective in bringing about social justice and racial equity." That list is artificially short. You might also include rioting, looting, arson, black-on-white crime, etc. These things have been tried too, and by your own admission, they have also failed. I know several things from your list which *could* work though. Shaming, appealing to a sense of decency, applying laws or appealing to the justice system; moral outrage; making speeches. These things would all work if we had a moral society. In fact the absence of morality, nothing will work. I hope you are working towards that. Without a moral foundation, we are doomed.
Has there been a study on the impact of teaching critical race theory to children? It seems like this theory would reinforce xenophobia when taught to minors. In the book Stamped from History, by Ibram Kendi; the ideology of systematic racism is argued to no longer exist. With Ibram Kendi been the highest regarded African American Historian claiming our country has moved beyond racism; why would this be introduced to schools at this time and what goal would this achieve?
Founder, CEO & CSO COOLSTIM.com
3 年Only "1. Racism is normal" is true. 2. CERTAIN TYPES OF Change occurs only when it aligns with the interests of those in power. 3. Race is a NOT a social construct. It's deeply genetic. My racial forebearers contributed their DNA and their entire amazing culture to raising and shaping their generations. 4. I have a single identity whether you or anyone else agrees. 5. All people in a category do not think and act the same. - unless they are fear-mongered or race-baited and dumped / duped into categories by those who seek to exploit them. 6. The stories of people must be heard. Why? Name a single rational reason that "people's" stories must be heard. Which people? 7. Cultural parochialism and white superiority are factors in maintaining systemic racism. You disapprove of Whiteness and culture (heritage, traditin, values, religion) because they stand in the way of efforts to control how and what people think. -the parochialism" Lastly. If we can admit that racism is normal, then maybe its time to talk about the room elephant -- Who benefits from making race an issue. Is it time to revoke the Government's ability to gaslight us about race & crime, reverse discrimination (Affirmative Action) and demand fairness?
Thank you for taking the time to write the description. Critical race theory itself suffers from parochialism and narrow lens interpretation. The context of hierarchies and relationships is vague, as is the existence of its own sphere of existence. It really only seeks to impress itself in "white" dominated geographic regions. This "domination" is also as loosely defined as having a population majority. White culture does not exist any more than black culture or Asian culture. Each geographic range and ethnic group has its own culture which is not dependent on melanin content. The social construct of race is also not a European invention but has existed in many countries and cultures throughout history. Points 5 and 7 thereby contradict each other in that it claims people are not of one identity but then lumps one system comprised of individuals together as one category. The theory also does not have any qualifier for basic ignorance, as an individual in any culture will follow the basic norms of said culture, one's own culture naturally becomes the basis for the comparison of another.
Board Certified Radiation Oncology Physicist
4 年Great content