Basics of Alternative Dispute Resolution Act
Sadsad Tamesis Legal and Accountancy Firm
Excellence and Commitment
Disputes, disagreements, and conflicts are common in people’s everyday lives, but sometimes, they escalate, and the need for overseeing authority and fair and efficient ways to resolve them becomes essential. And so enters the Philippine court system with corresponding jurisdiction over different cases.
However, due to clogged court cases, dysfunction and delays in judicial decisions and awards persist in the country. As such, the State enacted Republic Act No. 9285, otherwise known as the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (ADR Act), which sought to actively promote party autonomy in the resolution of disputes or the freedom of parties to make their own arrangements to resolve their disputes, achieve speedy and impartial justice, and unclog court dockets.?
The ADR Act adopts the United Nations Commission on International Trade Model Law on International Arbitration (UNCITRAL Model Law) and employs the Alternative Dispute Resolution System, which, according to Section 3 of the Act, refers to any process or procedure for resolving a dispute or controversy assisted by a neutral third party instead of a court presiding judge or an officer of a government agency.?
With the agreement of both parties, ADR Providers, such as institutions or persons accredited or nonaccredited as mediators, conciliators, arbitrators, neutral evaluators, etc., exercise ADR functions.
Forms of ADR
The most commonly used are arbitration and mediation.
Arbitration
According to Section 3 (d), arbitration means a voluntary dispute resolution process in which one or more arbitrators, appointed per the agreement of the parties, or rules promulgated under this Act, resolve a dispute by rendering an award.
The Republic Act No. 876 continues to govern domestic arbitration, subject to the applicable provisions of the ADR Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) and the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration adopted by the UNCITRAL on 21 June 1985.?
On the other hand, the ADR Act, its implementing rules and regulations, and the New York Convention govern foreign arbitration.?
Mediation
According to Section 3 (q), mediation is a voluntary process in which a mediator, selected by the disputing parties, facilitates communication and negotiation, and assists the parties in reaching a voluntary agreement regarding a dispute.
Other forms of ADR include:
领英推荐
Conciliation
According to the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA), conciliation is a process whereby a neutral third party takes a vigorous and active role in assisting disputants in formulating solutions to reach an amicable settlement. Conciliation can be considered under mediation.
Early Neutral Evaluation
Section 3 (n) of the Act defines early neutral evaluation as an ADR process wherein parties and their lawyers are brought together early in a pre-trial phase to present summaries of their cases and receive a nonbinding assessment by an experienced, neutral person, with expertise in the subject in the substance of the dispute.
Mini-trial
According to Section 3 (u), a mini-trial is a structured dispute resolution method in which the merits of a case are argued before a panel comprising senior decision makers with or without the presence of a neutral third person after which the parties seek a negotiated settlement.
And any combination of the foregoing.
ADR Services
Mandated in Section 49 of the Act, the Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) which is an attached agency to the Department of Justice (DOJ), is established to promote, develop, and expand the use of ADR in the private and public sectors. It also aims to assist the government in monitoring, studying, and evaluating the use by the public and the private sector of ADR, and recommend to Congress necessary statutory changes to develop, as well as to strengthen and improve ADR practices following world standards.
These are other agencies that also offer ADR services: