Barriers to Entry

Barriers to Entry

I'm writing this article not as a complaint, but as an education opportunity for the Security Industry and others like it. Industry's that are largely stuck in their ways, slow to evolve or keep up with the world around us. This year, I have noticed so many criticisms of programs promoting the development of Young Professionals and Women in industries that historically have not made space for these demographics to flourish early in their careers.

The security industry tends to take a Natural Selection approach - Only the Strong will Survive... but must we make it more difficult than it needs to be? Why do we force the struggle to prove ourselves, when building a career is hard enough?

In 2006, I made the decision to transition from Healthcare to Security via the Executive Protection industry. I had worked as a security guard both armed and unarmed and had found a deep sense of dissatisfaction at that level of the industry. I was a Veteran and while deployed overseas, I saw a different perspective on security operations. I saw a skill set that one could be proud of and make a career out of. As I began networking and taking courses to build my foundation of knowledge, I was advised to join ASIS to build my network and maybe get my foot in the door. 

At 25 years old and beginning my first career transition, money was scarce. I paid for my membership, which was very expensive to me at the time, joined the Chicago chapter which was 2 hours from the cornfield in which I lived, then paid about $40 to attend a meeting at Sears Tower. I had networking cards printed since I didn’t work in security yet.

When I arrived at the lunch, I mingled and introduced myself to people. As conversations turned to me, I told my story and that I was looking for an opportunity to get a new career started. By the end of the lunch I was staring out of the floor to ceiling windows looking at the Chicago skyline, with the other guy, who had also just separated from the military and moved to the area. We were talking about how quickly the conversations shut down once it was understood that we weren’t working in the industry and didn’t know anyone. 

We weren't valuable yet.

My ASIS membership didn’t get renewed until 2013 when the company I was working with as a consultant told me I should become a member. I asked “Why?” and if they were going to pay for it - because even though I was making a 6 figure salary in security, the value proposition was lost on me.

To my knowledge, there was no YP group at the time. I wholeheartedly agree that discriminatory hiring practices are terrible and destructive. I also hold the opinion that "Affirmative Action" programs do far more harm than good. 

But programs that promote Women and Young Professionals gaining entry and traction in an industry are not those things in my opinion.

They are not trying to elevate one group over another. They are support platforms for people to seek advice and mentorship. To discuss issues that are very specific to their current condition... being too new to be valuable. 

They are processes created to lower the barrier to entry and acquire mentorship that otherwise takes years. By the way, Women in Security always invites men to join their events. It's not exclusive at all.

In those early years of forced struggle & dissatisfaction, many bright lights are lost. 

It’s the byproduct of a confused industry that fancies itself a profession because we get to wear suits to work sometimes. But like the many broken security programs I’ve rehabilitated, we’ve just neglected to address the basic foundational principles such as formalizing a career path and role levels so that others can work towards promotion without relying on luck, or the good will of others.

It is this climate in Security which has led to the formation of Getting Security Done. Its time to accelerate the advancement of this industry. Hiring diverse perspectives and not limiting our talent pipeline to Government and Law Enforcement is the most basic step. The second step is making sure our Leaders and Managers are actually getting relevant training from the business world and not just relying on the leadership tactics of the military and law enforcement.

If you need help in your career, connect with me on Linked In. I'll be happy to chat and point you in the right direction.

Lastly, this is a good and worthwhile conversation. I would love to hear the perspectives of others. Maybe we can jump on a Zoom call to discuss it?

#GSDcrew #GettingSecurityDone #TheKindnessGames #TheRealKindnessGames

Lynn Mattice

President at National Economic Security Alliance

4 年

Tim, I experienced similar conditions when I first entered into the security industry. As a result, I have spent a lot of time mentoring young professionals and hopefully helping them launch their careers. You are 100% correct that we do not do enough as an industry to "home-grow" talent. I believe that the executive search firms that specialize in security have done the industry a disservice by constantly focusing on recruiting individuals who are retiring from government service at the Federal, State and Local government service and "selling" them to their clients. I greatly respect those who have performed in government service for their careers, but that does not make their law enforcement, military or intelligence skillsets directly transferable to the private sector. I have coached a number of individuals who came directly out of government service and accepted a position as a CSO in a corporation and have found the transition extremely taxing. They consistently have told me that they felt like a fish out of water and missed the feeling of comradery and mission that they felt working in government. Understanding corporate-speak for them is just as difficult to grasp as understanding government-speak is for folks in the private sector. We need to do much more to provide growth opportunities for young professionals in this industry.

Ashley Lapido

Project Management, Marketing/PR, Innovation & Design

4 年

I love this article, and I feel like the same can be said for the PR/Marketing Industry. It's a "who knows who" club with memberships and firms that "get your foot in the door." It's not a party you can show up to with hunger, focus, drive, and a willingness to learn. You must have an acclaimed badge from your time spent with a recognized company, with a title to boot. I was told I needed a B.S. degree in Public Relations to work at a firm and be a member of the PRSSA club etc. However, that alone isn't enough to get hired or even interviewed. It's a fun, creative world of storytelling/promoting, and yet the doors to get in have slates with secret passwords. I wonder how many other industries are the same? I think everyone who is paying for a college degree needs the respect of being told the truth about its return on investment and be given the correct tools/tricks to be prepared.

Nick Lapido

Driving Creative Excellence Through Strategic Leadership | COO at Lapido + Co

4 年

Tim, you highlighted the return on investment (or lack thereof) of joining associations that are supposed to provide "networking opportunities." You also mentioned barriers to entry used in industries that are "slow to evolve and keep up with the world around us." I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on what some of those barriers to entry are and whether or not they actually predict success in the industry. Are these evaluation metrics that industries use to gauge the "value" of prospects actually measuring what they say they are? Or are these barriers simply there to give the illusion of elitism and result in "many bright lights being lost"? On the flipside, what steps could companies take to evolve? Are there metrics that you believe are actually indicative of a quality candidate? Should companies incorporate better hiring practices, and what can individuals do as they navigate all this in searching for a job? All this is to say that the insights gained from this article and from further discussion of the topic are truly valuable. I believe it greatly benefits both individuals and companies to continue to have these discussions, grow their perspectives, and implement meaningful change.

Abhijeet K Sinha MBA CPP? CC?

Security Jedi | SecOps Optimizer | Agile Business Enabler | Risk & Innovation Specialist

4 年

Tim Wenzel, CPP ; i have been watching all the series of #TheKindnessGame ... Saying thanks or praising or being kind in Security is almost rare . And this make your thoughts and this article special ... A smile or saying "A Thank You" to a security personnel is like force multiplier of motivation.... Sharing story and appreciating via this kinda event is innovative & exemplary... Regards Abhijeet S

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tim Wenzel, CPP的更多文章

  • Communicating Through Transition

    Communicating Through Transition

    The Vanquishing Evil Management Initiative Pt. 3 This is the third in a series of collaborative management articles by…

    19 条评论
  • The Vanquishing Evil Management Initiative

    The Vanquishing Evil Management Initiative

    A collaborative Thought Leadership series by Andy Scantland & Tim Wenzel Article 2, Article 3, Article 4, V-article 5…

    6 条评论
  • Instinct & Common Sense

    Instinct & Common Sense

    In February of this year, the GSD team (Getting Security Done) put out a survey to CSOs on what qualities they most…

    16 条评论
  • 2019 Reading List

    2019 Reading List

    Over the last couple weeks, I’ve been thinking about 2019 and how I can improve as leader of people and programs…

    4 条评论
  • The Secret to Success

    The Secret to Success

    This has been a different kind of year for me for many reasons. Between talking to kids entering college, giving a…

    8 条评论
  • Happy Veterans Day!

    Happy Veterans Day!

    Growing up in rural Illinois left much to be desired. As early as grade school, I was dissatisfied with my surroundings.

    7 条评论
  • 2017: “How did this happen?”

    2017: “How did this happen?”

    Audit & Challenge article 10: Leadership Shadow Brokers, Wanna Cry, "The Year of Vehicle Attacks", WikiLeaks: CIA…

    4 条评论
  • What are You Thankful For?

    What are You Thankful For?

    Audit & Challenge article 9: Leadership “The unlucky are nothing more than a frame of reference for the lucky. You are…

    2 条评论
  • Integrity... What is it Anyway?

    Integrity... What is it Anyway?

    Audit & Challenge article 8: Industry Values This is the third article about Industry Values during the Audit &…

    18 条评论
  • End User Security Technology Strategy, Part 2

    End User Security Technology Strategy, Part 2

    Audit & Challenge article 7: Security Strategy This is the second installment of a 3 part essay. If you missed Part 1…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了