THE BANDWIDTH OF INTIMACY - PART 1

THE BANDWIDTH OF INTIMACY - PART 1

I've noticed a concept come up again and again when I work with couples that want to create more art and depth in their connection and intimacy.

That concept is the bandwidth of connection between the two partners.

Your bandwidth for connection is a lot like the same bandwidth you have for the internet coming into your house. When the bandwidth is wide, you can receive, and provide, a?great deal of input to and from your partner. When the bandwidth is narrow, you can receive and provide very little input. And when the bandwidth is pinched off or closed, you?cannot receive or provide any input.

In any relationship — romantic or otherwise — the bandwidth available between you and the other person is continually shifting. Your bandwidth widens and narrows as time?goes on, and is a function of both partners involved.

When your partner says something that you perceive as hurtful, you will close yourself, energetically, and thus narrow the bandwidth available between the two of you. When?your partner says something that you perceive as loving, you will open yourself, energetically, and thus widen the bandwidth available.

This same thing is happening on the other side of the conversation, and this dance makes up a lot of the art that is available in relationship.

When your partner closes themselves, it makes it easy to justify your own closure — a narrowing of the available bandwidth. But the truth is that whichever partner is willing?to hold their position longest is the one that dictates the bandwidth available.

If your partner closes themselves, and you stay open in the face of their closure, eventually, they too will open back up.

This isn't easy. When we are close to someone, we become less loving and more fearful, and from our fear, we tend to be nasty. Like an animal that's hurt, we swipe out, even if?someone is trying to offer us kindness.

You always have a choice in the matter of the bandwidth that is available between you and your partner. You can be at the effect of their closure, insisting that that is the?reason there is a lack of intimate bandwidth between the two of you, without taking responsibility for the fact that you are simply unwilling to stay open.

Alternatively, you can be committed to staying closed yourself, punishing your partner for their perceived transgressions, and refusing to meet them in the wider bandwidth?their openness is inviting.

Or, you can stand for greater bandwidth, and keep yourself open in the face of your partner's closure. Loving them, standing open-hearted and willing to be with everything?they bring, in service of creating more intimacy and connection between the two of you in the moment.

Most attempts to "fix" relationships that are problematic (as an example, imagine a couple trying to "work things out" after years of built up acrimony and resentment) operate?on top of a tiny amount of bandwidth.

All of the frustration and resentment that have accrued over the years come into conflict with the narrow window for intimacy and connection the partners have for each other,?and consequently, it's like trying to do complicated, data-intensive work over a dial-up connection and a 2400 baud modem (that's a reference for the cool kids).

Before we can start to really address some of the stuff that's built up, we need to develop some capacity to stay open with one another and sit in the tension that gets created.?Only from there can we begin to grow the seed of intimacy, and begin to develop mastery in the art of intimacy.

Next post, I'll elaborate on some of the things that happen when our bandwidth becomes narrowed or pinched off completely, and how you may see this manifesting in your?relationships, as well as what there is to do about it.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Adam Quiney的更多文章

  • Trust Lies in its Practice

    Trust Lies in its Practice

    One of the greatest gifts this work has given me is my relationship with my coach. At its core, that relationship is…

    3 条评论
  • Why Your Breakthroughs Are Broken

    Why Your Breakthroughs Are Broken

    Have you noticed that affirmations and breakthroughs designed to fix what isn't working about your life, seem to…

    2 条评论
  • Why Your Leadership Book Isn’t Helping

    Why Your Leadership Book Isn’t Helping

    Leadership is a lot like an iceberg. The 10% of the iceberg that we can see—the part above the waterline—is the theory.

    2 条评论
  • Why Breakdowns Are the Most Important Part of Leadership

    Why Breakdowns Are the Most Important Part of Leadership

    In this post, I want to talk about one of the most sophisticated ways our ego keeps us in check — by strategizing and…

    2 条评论
  • On Politics, Leadership and Transformation

    On Politics, Leadership and Transformation

    In today’s hyper-polarized political climate, it’s easy to get caught up in reactive judgments, aligning ourselves…

    2 条评论
  • The Speed of Your Transformation is the Speed of Your Practice

    The Speed of Your Transformation is the Speed of Your Practice

    Transformation is not something that happens overnight. It’s not something that can be guaranteed to unfold in a neat…

    5 条评论
  • Why Leaders Have Breakdowns

    Why Leaders Have Breakdowns

    In this post, I'm going to talk about how transformational leaders create opportunities for breakthroughs out of…

    3 条评论
  • Defining Breakthroughs

    Defining Breakthroughs

    Breakthroughs are a poorly understood concept in most leadership conversations. Today, we're going to start by creating…

  • Defining Breakthroughs

    Defining Breakthroughs

    Breakthroughs are a poorly understood concept in most leadership conversations. Today, we’re going to start by creating…

    3 条评论
  • Fear

    Fear

    Fear is a healthy sign. It means someone is playing a game in their life that has stakes to it.

    9 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了