Balancing Low Code and Custom Code: Best of Both Worlds

In the contemporary software development landscape, businesses often find themselves contemplating whether to opt for low code platforms or to invest in custom code. While custom code remains unbeatable for large-scale, specialized projects that require long-term viability, low code platforms like Microsoft’s Power Platform have carved out their own niche, offering immense value for limited-scope, quick-turnaround applications. This article explores how to balance these two options to achieve the best of both worlds, with a particular emphasis on the advantages of low code platforms for low-effort projects.

When Low Code Shines: Small-Scale, Low-Effort Projects

Quick Prototyping

Low code platforms excel in scenarios that require rapid prototyping. The speed of development and the flexibility to iterate are invaluable when you're working against tight deadlines or still fleshing out your application’s requirements. However, the prototyping convenience can be a double-edged sword if these applications are later expected to evolve into larger, more complex systems.

Limited-Scope Applications

Low code is particularly useful for small, isolated projects aimed at specific tasks or used by a limited number of people. In such cases, the platform's limitations on scalability and customization are less of an issue, while its speed and ease-of-use offer clear advantages.

Citizen Developers

Low code platforms democratize application development, allowing non-developers to create functional solutions quickly. This is especially useful for department-level needs that don't require extensive development resources.

Integration and Compatibility

For low-effort projects that need to interact with existing software ecosystems, the pre-built components and integrations available in low code platforms can save time and money.

The Enduring Relevance of Custom Code: When Complexity Calls

Cost-Effectiveness

While low code platforms might offer cheaper upfront costs, their long-term Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) can be quite high due to licensing and scalability costs. Custom code, particularly when utilizing open-source technologies, offers greater control over the long-term expenses associated with your project.

Build Time for Complex Projects

For complex applications that go beyond surface-level requirements, custom coding can actually be more efficient in terms of build time. This is especially true when specific functionalities that are not supported by low code platforms are needed.

Flexibility and Capability

For businesses requiring a high degree of customization, integration, or optimization, custom code is irreplaceable. It offers virtually unlimited flexibility and control over every aspect of your application, from user interface design to data architecture.

Striking a Balance

1. Phase-Based Approach: Start with a low code platform for quick prototyping and initial rollouts. As the application matures and the requirements become more specialized, transition to a custom-coded solution.
2. Hybrid Solutions: Utilize low code for certain modules that don't require complex functionalities, while relying on custom code for specialized features.
3. Skill Set Utilization: Leverage citizen developers for low-effort tasks via low code platforms, while your specialized development team focuses on complex, custom-coded solutions.

Conclusion

Low code and custom code each have their own sets of advantages and limitations. Low code platforms like Power Platform are exceptional tools for quick, low-effort projects with limited scope. However, they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. For projects that are complex, require long-term viability, or need a high degree of customization, custom code remains the gold standard. By adopting a balanced approach that leverages the strengths of both, businesses can enjoy both quick wins and long-term success.