Balancing Change Management
Have you ever seen your employer invest a substantial amount of time and resources into launching a new tool or program only for your co-workers to continue doing things the old way? It’s a sadly common phenomenon because people like what’s familiar, familiar is easy. ?
If you want people to expend the energy to relearn an aspect of their job, you first need to take the time to help them understand why the current state is broken and needs to be fixed. You then need to dedicate adequate time and resources to helping your people learn the new way of working. And finally, you need to ensure that adequate guardrails are put in place to reinforce and sustain the change going forward. ?
Over the last decade I have managed change for several very different companies. Yet employees at all of them initially shared the same belief that Change Management is?simply communications and training. The reason is simple, most companies do not allocate adequate resources for managing change. Either the responsibility to manage change falls on the Communications and Training teams or communications and training falls on their Change Manager. We turn our people into a jack of all trades and a master of none. ?
领英推荐
Before leaders will allocate resources to change management, they need to be shown the value to their organization. Change management is about delivering desired results. According to the findings of a 2023 research study by Prosci , 87% of initiatives with poor change management fail to meet their objectives while 88% of projects with excellent change management met or exceeded objectives. You are 7 times more likely to achieve your project's objectives if you leverage proper change management. ??
It is easy for leaders to get excited about such an increase in results. So much so that it can lead to the opposite problem, applying change management to everything whether it’s called for or not. When everything is important, nothing is important. Teams quickly get burned out and experience change fatigue. ?
Finding a proper balance requires prioritization. Leaders must align on which projects and initiatives to green light, and which changes to delay. Changes people understand and desire will require much less management than ones that encounter higher resistance. The more resistance you encounter the more protracted the change effort will need to be to achieve desired levels of adoption and results. ? ? ?
Love the article and agree that organizations need to prioritize and roll out changes in a way that takes care of stakeholders and guards against fatigue. On another note, I've been on a quest for OCM data from sources other than Prosci. Nothing against their methodology, which is sound and easy to grasp, but their data tends to be sourced from "believers" and I'm looking for more all-encompassing data. Thoughts..?
Transformation and Enterprise Change Management Leader | Walmart | Target | Nike | Prosci certified |
9 个月Michael, I don’t think the application of change management is the issue. I think the inability to prioritize the business initiatives is the issue. If people need to change their behaviors in order to achieve the business results (I will argue that is 97 percent of initiatives) then change management is helpful to get your business there (like the Prosci research shows). The problem is that most organizations undertake too much at any given moment in time and move on to the next thing too quickly - not leaving enough room for sustained adoption of the changes.