Balancing Branding and Boundaries: Privacy Considerations When Using Employee Photos for Corporate Purposes

Balancing Branding and Boundaries: Privacy Considerations When Using Employee Photos for Corporate Purposes

In an era where authenticity drives engagement, companies love showcasing their employees—think team photos on websites, spotlight posts on social media, or glossy shots in annual reports. It’s a great way to humanise a brand. But before you hit “post,” there’s a critical question to tackle: Are you respecting privacy? Using an employee’s photo for corporate purposes isn’t just a creative choice—it’s an ethical and legal one, especially under frameworks like the GDPR. Let’s explore how to get it right.

1. Consent Is Non-Negotiable—and GDPR Makes It Clear

The cornerstone of any photo-use policy is consent, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU sets a high bar. Under GDPR, a photograph is considered personal data because it can identify an individual. Article 6 requires a lawful basis for processing this data, and consent is often the most practical option for employers. But it’s not enough to assume an employee’s “okay” covers it—GDPR demands that consent be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. A casual nod won’t do; you need a clear, documented “yes,” ideally in writing or via a signed form, spelling out exactly how the image will be used (e.g., “for the company newsletter” or “on our public web page”).

2. Context and Purpose: GDPR’s Specificity Rule

Even with consent, GDPR’s Article 5(1)(b) insists that personal data be collected for “specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes” and not used in ways incompatible with those purposes. Translation? If an employee agrees to a headshot for the internal directory, you can’t repurpose it for a billboard ad without circling back for fresh consent. This principle of purpose limitation protects employees from having their likeness stretched beyond what they signed up for—an easy oversight in fast-moving marketing teams.

3. Opting Out Should Be Easy—and GDPR Enforces It

Not every employee wants their face splashed across corporate channels, and GDPR backs their right to say no. Article 7(3) guarantees that individuals can withdraw consent at any time, as easily as they gave it. Companies need to make opting out frictionless—no guilt trips, no career consequences. This is doubly important for employees who might have privacy concerns, like avoiding online visibility for personal safety. A culture of respect means honouring those boundaries without question.

4. Data Minimisation and Retention: GDPR’s Hidden Gems

GDPR doesn’t stop at consent—it also governs how long you keep and use those photos. Article 5(1)(c) calls for data minimisation, meaning you should only collect what’s necessary for the stated purpose. A team photo for a one-off campaign? Don’t store it indefinitely. And when an employee leaves, Article 17—the “right to be forgotten”—kicks in. They can request erasure of their data, including photos, unless you’ve got a compelling legal reason to keep it (spoiler: “it looks good on our site” isn’t one). Smart companies set retention policies—like deleting images within six months of departure—and check with ex-employees about ongoing use.

5. Beyond the Employee: GDPR’s Broader Reach

An employee’s photo doesn’t just affect them—it’s tied to their identity, and public use can ripple outward. GDPR’s focus on data protection impact assessments (Article 35) encourages companies to think about risks, like unwanted attention from third parties or exposure in jurisdictions with weaker privacy laws. If you’re posting globally, consider how accessible that photo becomes—and whether it’s tagged with names or other identifiers that amplify the footprint.

A Global Lens with GDPR as the Gold Standard

While GDPR applies to EU residents, its principles are influencing privacy norms worldwide—and for good reason. In the U.S., state laws like California’s CCPA echo some of these protections, but GDPR remains a benchmark for its rigour. By prioritising explicit consent, purpose clarity, and employee control, companies can use photos effectively without legal or ethical missteps. It’s not just about avoiding fines (up to €20 million or 4% of annual turnover under GDPR)—it’s about trust.


Get subscribed to the X.com account of the newsletter so as to get daily insights and recommendations on how to get your company's workplace culture compliant and ethical.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ilia Dubovtsev的更多文章