BAF: More increases to come

BAF: More increases to come

We are now 3 weeks into the new IMO2020 low-Sulphur regime, and two aspects are emerging for the container shipping sector. The bunker price premium has spiked but seems to ease off slowly, and the carriers have not yet achieved a substantial compensation.

During most of 2019, there was relatively wide consensus that low-Sulphur fuel would likely command a premium around 200 USD/ton. But coming into 2020, the premium measured across the top-20 ports spiked above 300 USD/ton. This is likely driven by short-term transition effects and has also in the past week slowly been easing off, but is still around 280 USD/ton. Unless we see further easing off in the coming weeks, this indicate potentially a higher price than envisioned in 2019.

Secondly, spot rates including the new BAF elements have indeed increased coming into 2020, but even looking at the latest SCFI levels from 17 January the problem is that the increases can basically be explained by the normal seasonality we would expect from the Chinese New Year effect. No separate BAF increase can be distinguished.

Another comparison would be against the rate levels immediately prior to Chinese New Year in 2013 and 2014. At these points in time, bunker fuel had a cost around 700 USD/ton. Not materially different from low Sulphur fuel which for the top-20 ports spiked at 694 USD/ton in early January 2020.

For Asia-North Europe the pre-CNY rates in 2013 and 2014 spiked at 1418 USD/TEU and 1765 USD/TEU respectively. In 2020 they have spiked at 1124 USD/TEU.

Similarly for Asia-USWC they spiked at 2520 USD/FFE and 2111 USD/FFE in 2013 and 2014, whereas in 2020 this is at 1636 USD/FFE.

Clearly, an added element is the increase in vessel sizes which has lowered overall operational costs for carriers, but it is a stark contrast to the last time we saw fuel prices at these levels and does provide another indication that the carriers appear not to be successful in getting through the bunker-induced increases they were looking for yet.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lars Jensen的更多文章

  • Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    When I first got involved in maritime cyber security in 2014 with CyberKeel (now a part of Improsec) we approached a…

    4 条评论
  • Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Amongst the container lines, the two frontrunners on online digital container freight sales are Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd…

    8 条评论
  • Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Actual measurements of the demand impact on container trade still do not exist. All the data sources which measure this…

    1 条评论
  • Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    In the investor conference call held by Maersk today (20 Feb) after release of their 2019 annual accounts, numbers on…

    5 条评论
  • Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    The impact on container shipping keeps worsening. According to the latest SeaIntelligence Sunday Spotlight the carriers…

    5 条评论
  • Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    The Sea-Intelligence Sunday Spotlight has just been published – 2 days earlier than usual in order to provide a timely…

    11 条评论
  • December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    Container Trade Statistics has published the December data for global container shipments. North American imports…

  • Are you ready for IMO2021?

    Are you ready for IMO2021?

    As all are acutely aware, IMO2020 is upon us and 2019’s mad scramble to comply with the new low-Sulphur rules is coming…

    5 条评论
  • Now: Additional BAF increases

    Now: Additional BAF increases

    Maersk appears to be the first container carrier to announce additional BAF increases triggered by the sharp increases…

    12 条评论
  • How not to use the MRV CO2 emissions data

    How not to use the MRV CO2 emissions data

    The EU legislation mandating shipping lines to report CO2 emissions is in principle a good starting point for…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了