Backtransformation

Backtransformation is the process of converting the results obtained from a transformed dataset back to the original scale of the data. This step is essential for interpretation and communication, especially when the audience is not familiar with the specific transformations used in the analysis.

Why Back-transform?

• Interpretability: Data is often transformed to meet the assumptions of a statistical model. However, the results in the transformed scale may not be intuitive. Back-transforming allows results to be presented in the original, more understandable units.
• Meaningful Conclusions: It helps in drawing conclusions that are meaningful in the context of the original data. For example, predicting a response in the original scale can be more relevant than in a logarithmic scale.

Common Backtransformation Methods

1. Inverse of Log Transformation: If you have used a logarithmic transformation (log(x)), backtransformation involves taking the exponent of the result. The formula is x=e^(transformed)?value.
2. Inverse of Square Root Transformation: For square root transformation (root(x)), square the result to back-transform (x=(transformed?value)^2).
3. Inverse of Box-Cox Transformation: The Box-Cox transformation is a bit more complex. It includes a parameter λ, and the backtransformation depends on the value of λ. The backtransformed formula looks like something; x = (transformed value. λ + 1)^1/λ when λ =/0 and x = e^trasnformed value when λ = 0
4. Other Specific Inverse Transformations: Depending on the transformation applied (e.g., reciprocal, logarithm base 10, arcsine), the inverse function corresponding to the original transformation is used.

How to Back-transform

1. Logarithmic Transformation

• Backtransformation: Exponentiation
• Used For Normalizing right-skewed data
• Common Transformations: Natural log (log), log base 10 (log10)

R Code:

# Log Transformation
log_transformed <- log(original_data)

# Backtransformation
backtransformed <- exp(log_transformed)        

2. Square Root Transformation

• Backtransformation: Squaring
• Used For Reducing right skewness, stabilizing variance in count data

R Code:

# Square Root Transformation
sqrt_transformed <- sqrt(original_data)

# Backtransformation
backtransformed <- sqrt_transformed^2        

3. Box-Cox Transformation

• Backtransformation: Depends on lambda value
• Used For Normalizing data, stabilizing the variance
• Requires: Specifying a lambda (λ) value

R Code:

library(MASS) # for Box-Cox Transformation

# Box-Cox Transformation (example with lambda = 0.5)
boxcox_transformed <- boxcox(original_data, lambda = 0.5)

# Backtransformation (for lambda = 0.5)
backtransformed <- (boxcox_transformed * 0.5 + 1)^(1/0.5)        

4. Reciprocal Transformation

• Backtransformation: Reciprocal
• Used For Reducing skewness, the modifying scale of measurement

R Code:

# Reciprocal Transformation
reciprocal_transformed <- 1 / original_data

# Backtransformation
backtransformed <- 1 / reciprocal_transformed        

6. Arcsine Square Root Transformation

• Backtransformation: Square and Inverse Sine
• Used For Proportion data, especially near 0 or 1

R Code:

# Arcsine Square Root Transformation
arcsine_transformed <- asin(sqrt(original_data))

# Backtransformation
backtransformed <- sin(arcsine_transformed)^2        

Considerations in Backtransformation

• Bias: Direct backtransformation can lead to bias, especially for transformations like the logarithm. Adjustments such as Duan’s smearing estimate can be used to correct this.
• Interpretation of Parameters: In regression models, backtransforming coefficients for interpretation can be complex, as the relationship between variables in the transformed scale may not directly translate to the original scale.
• Error Metrics: If you transform your response variable, remember that error metrics (like RMSE) will also be in the transformed scale and might need adjustment or interpretation in the original scale.

Readings: https://davegiles.blogspot.com/2014/12/s.html (Bias during back-transformation)

Duan's smearing estimate is a technique used in statistics to adjust for bias when backtransforming predictions from a regression model. This technique is particularly relevant when the dependent variable has been log-transformed to satisfy model assumptions, such as linearity or homoscedasticity.

When you log-transform a dependent variable and develop a regression model, the predictions made by this model are also in the log scale. Directly exponentiating these predicted values to back transform them to the original scale can introduce bias, particularly in the presence of heteroscedasticity.

Duan's Smearing Estimate

To address this issue, Duan (1983) proposed the smearing estimate. The idea is to adjust the back-transformed predictions by an average factor derived from the residuals of the model. This method is especially useful when you expect the residuals to be heteroscedastic.

How It Works

1. Fit a Regression Model: First, fit a regression model to the log-transformed dependent variable.
2. Calculate Residuals: Compute the residuals from this model.
3. Smearing Factor: Calculate the smearing factor, which is the average of the exponentiated residuals.
4. Adjust Predictions: Multiply the exponentiated predictions by the smearing factor to obtain the back-transformed, adjusted predictions.

R Code:

# Assume 'model' is your regression model on log-transformed data

# Step 1: Fit a regression model

# Step 2: Calculate residuals
residuals <- residuals(model)

# Step 3: Calculate the smearing factor
smearing_factor <- mean(exp(residuals))

# Step 4: Adjust predictions
# Assume 'log_predictions' are your model's predictions on log scale
adjusted_predictions <- exp(log_predictions) * smearing_factor        

When to Use

Duan's smearing estimate is particularly useful when:

• The dependent variable in the regression is log-transformed.
• There is heteroscedasticity in the residuals of the model.
• You want to backtransform predictions while minimizing bias.

Limitations

• Duan's method assumes that the form of the heteroscedasticity in the residuals is multiplicative.
• It may not be appropriate if the log transformation does not adequately stabilize the variance or if the residuals are not normally distributed.

If my post helped you, you can buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/sauravdastsk