Back in the game.
The Lake of Tunis (21 January, 2025).

Back in the game.

Hello friends,

Over the new year, I was in upstate New York, the DC area, and Cambridge. There was a bit of work to be done, but it was largely an excuse to escape Singapore’s heat and humidity and reflect on 2024. One thing I re-realised: Each year passes slowly in the moment but fast as a whole, and remembering even major events is nearly impossible without resorting to the calendar. What doesn’t get recorded somewhere and actively recalled usually gets forgotten. I wasn’t planning to be gone for three months, but here we are.

I went quiet because relocating back to Singapore (yes, I’m back; Singapore friends and neighbors, let’s catch up) has taken up more headspace than I wanted it to. And outside Singapore, first two months of 2025 have been filled with uncertainty too.

Now, when I talk about "uncertainty," I don’t mean the quantifiable unknowns that can be accurately expressed in probabilities and risk tables. As I’ve written before, “in true uncertainty, you are missing crucial information about actions, outcomes, causation, or valuation. This missing information makes it impossible to accurately calculate expected outcomes and what they are worth.

The uncertainty of early 2025 has a different flavour from the Covid-19 uncertainty in early 2020, or the first phases of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. The world order seems to be on the cusp of a dramatic dislocation. (The dislocation has already happened, with what remains of the appearance of normalcy being preserved by the inertia and momentum of very large systems.)

Even in the last month, the range of possible actions states can take (and have taken) has expanded into previously unimagined areas. There is now a lot more uncertainty about the range of possible outcomes that might result, the causal mechanisms connecting actions and outcomes, and how outcomes are subjectively valued. Each of these is a different type of not-knowing that brings its own pattern of challenges and opportunities.

I’ve been working with the UN Development Programme for over a year, building and deploying concretely applicable management tools to help teams that have to operate in an increasingly uncertain and rapidly changing development environment.

Most of January I spent preparing and delivering workshops for UNDP offices in Tunisia and Istanbul. These were workshops to help teams articulate tradeoffs more transparently and straightforwardly than they had before — and to teach them how to do this tradeoff articulation on their own. Seeing how quickly these workshops had concrete effect reinforced my belief that talking about tradeoffs is the only way to be pragmatic and creative about shared strategy and strategic goals, especially when resources and constraints are uncertain.

Knowing there would be a language barrier, I refactored the workshop structure to make the process much more granular and even clearer than before. The feedback was better than I’d hoped: the workshop was “exceptionally straightforward, concrete, and immediately applicable for a tool that was newly introduced to a team.”

So now I’m building again — this time a tool to solve a problem I’ve been wrestling with for over a decade. I’ll share more when I have a junky prototype. (The last time I built a tool was in 2021, and the result was idk, which is the first training tool for productive discomfort. You should check it out.)

See you in a couple weeks,

VT


Irek Klimczak

Customer Loyalty | Email Marketing | Loyalty Builders Host | Keynote Speaker

3 周

Awesome news Vaughn Tan! I'd be happy to test the prototype :)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vaughn Tan的更多文章

  • Strategy is not the same as planning

    Strategy is not the same as planning

    Recently, I was asked to outline the key distinctive pieces of my view of strategy. It came down to where I stand on…

    5 条评论
  • The Hidden Problem with Interdependent Work (and How to Fix It)

    The Hidden Problem with Interdependent Work (and How to Fix It)

    One of the biggest challenges in organisations today is navigating hidden but misaligned priorities within…

    6 条评论
  • Where probability isn't useful

    Where probability isn't useful

    Finally, more people are pointing out something I’ve spent more than the last decade trying to communicate: That we…

    7 条评论
  • A book and tool for thriving in uncertainty.

    A book and tool for thriving in uncertainty.

    Uncertainty is not the same thing as risk — though many people use "uncertainty" and "risk" interchangeably. The world…

    14 条评论
  • The sweet spot in the missing middle.

    The sweet spot in the missing middle.

    Hello friends, First, a note about consumption: It’s that time of year when gifting becomes ubiquitous. Have you…

    7 条评论
  • Overlooking meaningmaking

    Overlooking meaningmaking

    Alva No?'s latest essay for Aeon is about whether machines can think, but is also about something much more important:…

    5 条评论
  • What to do about uncertainty (that's not risk).

    What to do about uncertainty (that's not risk).

    My old friend Victoria (Tory) Wobber, CPCC pinged me last week. In her line of work, she helps people deal with…

    1 条评论
  • Innovation and "organisation" as a verb

    Innovation and "organisation" as a verb

    Is it possible to design and build organisations that are better at finding new information and making sense of it, and…

    4 条评论
  • AI's missing middle.

    AI's missing middle.

    So much time and money is flowing into AI today, but it’s nearly all focused on building foundational technology:…

    4 条评论
  • The meaningmaking lens

    The meaningmaking lens

    Meaningmaking is a simple concept but one that is counterintuitively powerful in understanding how we think about work…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了