Back to basics ... AI foundations
These days, barely a day goes by without another announcement about artificial intelligence – where the tech is touted as the answer to everything! Don’t get me wrong, I firmly believe AI will be an increasing feature of our lives going forward. Just as today we can barely imagine life ‘pre-smartphone,’ in the future, we will come to be just as reliant on AI to help us go about our daily tasks.
However, there is one thing we will have to get right if we are to realise the full potential: the data. Behind every AI is a data-hungry algorithm. In order to train the algo, we need to find the right data in the first place. Data, by its very nature, is often full of impurities and problems – hospital/patient-related data is a great example of this. If the data you’ve sourced on specific types of cancer is from a hospital that happens to be in a demographic which is, for example, predominantly white and middle class, then just applying that algorithm to another location with a different demographic will mean it doesn’t work as well. Sometimes that’s easy to spot – a human check after the AI diagnosis may spot when a diagnosis is missed, but the worst case is that the bias is hidden deeply and not spotted at all.
If we are to trust that AI can help us make important decisions, (and I believe a human/machine combination is definitely going to be a better option than a human-one alone), then we will need to get data governance right.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure that people really understand the heavy lifting involved in collection and curation and preparation of data before you get started on the "fun stuff" like AI. Without carefully going through those steps, the risk of unforeseen consequences increases - and carelessness can have very serious consequences indeed, especially in the world of health, but frankly across public sector.
The problem is that these data preparation steps are not the fun part, they don't get the headlines and it is painstaking work, that does not really get rewarded properly. It's also incredibly time-consuming - it can take months and months to get right .. all whilst you are being asked about when we can start seeing the results of the AI.
领英推荐
The new government has talked about some promising initiatives in the data space, some of which will support AI development, but I worry that public sector organisations will be inundated by well intentioned suppliers trying to help them "do more AI" and the only people who can really get to grips with all the pre work around data prep and curation are those who really understand the data. Inevitably this is more often than not the internal teams which means a lot more burden on these overworked teams. Bringing in new or temporary staff doesn't really work either ... finding the right way to get this done will be key to creating trust in AI, and releasing the potential it can bring.
I'm not being negative, I do believe Artificial intelligence can transform our world and I am excited for the future – we just need to make sure we invest in building the right foundations.
Author's note: I am thinking of making this is a new blog series under the back to basics headlines ...
Exactly what I found when working on a pilot of AI analysis of healthcare data - rushed staff putting brief free text notes down rather than recording data in expected way and system test data (that should have been deleted) all lumped together… by far the largest part of that job was cleaning up and making sense of the data.
Experienced Technology Architect
8 个月Garbage in, garbage out still holds true…. Part of the challenge I see is businesses convincing themselves that GenAI is the answer to all their problems - without first understanding their problems or how GenAI can actually help (and more importantly where it may hinder or add unintended risk)…
CX / UX | Digital Transformation | Systems Thinking |
8 个月As a supplier of AI to the NHS with Skin Analytics, I've seen firsthand how AI can be a game-changer in healthcare, catching conditions early and improving treatments. Couldn't agree more that we've got to nail the quality and diversity of our data to avoid bias and ensure accuracy... robust data practices = safe and effective AI implementations!!
Founder & CEO AI Startup | Data & AI Expert | Digital Health Expert | NED | Strategic Advisor
8 个月Isn't it always about the data... :-) long way to go to take advantage of AI in many areas, but in many areas should have faster adoption, would love to see public sector adopt more, we too risk averse, if I look at what starting to happen in US....
Helping government and public services leaders start and restart reform and transformation initiatives | RSA Fellow | Chartered Management Consultant | Recovering Politician | Sharer of #SocialBattery pins
8 个月Really good points Niamh. We’ve already seen what happens when we import existing biases into AI tech. It’s not pretty and leads to bad outcomes in #publicservices You’re right about data. I’m also concerned that #AI has become a buzzword with little understanding of what it entails in reality. The other concern I have is that ‘AI’ is actually made possible by convergent technologies - compute power at scale, big data sets, cloud on demand etc. That doesn’t take into account that we have a massive capability gap in the workforce too and we’ll never get the most from technology if we don’t address that.