B-Frames, Ultra Low-Latency Encoding, and Parking Lot Rules

B-Frames, Ultra Low-Latency Encoding, and Parking Lot Rules

by Jan Ozer at NETINT Technologies Inc.

One of my sweetest memories of bringing up our two daughters was weekly trips to the grocery store. Each got a $5.00 bribe for accompanying their father, which they happily invested in various tchotchkes that seldom lasted the week. When we exited the car, “parking lot rules” always applied, which meant that each daughter held one of Daddy’s hands for the walk to the store. Two girls, two hands, no running around the busy parking lot.

Parking lot rules came to mind as we debugged a decoding latency issue when testing?a new server product . Initial tests revealed a decoding latency of up to 200 milliseconds in some high-volume configurations. Given that the encoding latency was under 20 milliseconds, the decoding numbers were uncomfortably high.

Eliminate B-Frames from the Origination Stream

After raising the issue, our testing team implemented a fix, which dropped?latency ?to under 20 milliseconds, and decreased encoding latency as well. The change is the parking-lot-rules corollary for live streamers, which is “for ultra-low latency, eliminate B-frames from your live streaming workflow.” With?H.264 , this means using the baseline profile, which eliminates B-frames. With?H.265 , you’ll have to use a GOP structure that does the same.

A quick glance at?Figure 1?reveals why B-frames blow-up decoding latency (shoutout to?OTTverse,? where we grabbed the image). B-frames, of course, incorporate redundancies from frames before and after the frame being encoded. They are packed and decoded out of order. Any frame decoded out of order adds latency – the further they are out of order, the greater the latency.

Are you passionate about video streaming and looking to expand your network and knowledge? Join the?Video Streaming Innovators Circle ?on LinkedIn! You'll have the opportunity to connect with like-minded professionals from across the industry, access valuable resources for professional development, and collaborate with others on exciting projects.

Don't miss out on this opportunity to join a supportive community of innovators!?https://www.dhirubhai.net/groups/12827424/

Will eliminating B-frames (or the Baseline H.264 profile) reduce the quality of the incoming stream? Only minimally, if at all. These streams are typically produced at a relatively high bit rate, so B-frames or higher-quality profiles deliver minimal additional quality. It’s even less likely that any decrease in quality would be noticeable in the output stream (see?here ).

Let’s pause for a moment and reflect on the bigger picture.?Figure 2?shows the typical live streaming workflow. We’ve been talking about B-frames in the on-premise encode impacting the decoding latency in the transcoding server. What about B-frames in the transcoding server when encoding streams for delivery to viewers?

Predictably, the result is the same. B-frames introduce the same latency during encoding for delivery, for the same reason–packing frames out of order introduces delays. This is why, when implementing low-latency mode with the NETINT?Quadra Video Processing Unit ?and?T408 transcoder , you must use a GOP preset that encodes with consecutive frames.

When you get things right – incoming streams without B-frames and outgoing streams without B-frames, the results are transformative. Let’s have a look.

Tue Low Latency Transcoding

Table 1?below shows actual testing results. This use case involves scaling 1080p AVC input down to 720p for delivery, which is common for?interactive gaming , auction sites, and?conferencing , and the server can produce 320 streams while encoding?AVC, HEVC, and AV1 . I don’t have the original data for the input file with B-frames, but as I recall, decoder latency averaged 150 – 200 ms, a noticeable break in a live conversation. Even worse, unlike encoder latency, it didn’t drop significantly in low-delay mode.

As you see in the table, after the fix, total latency is around 160 ms for all outputs in normal, (latency-tolerant) mode. Working with the input file without B-frames, and outputting streams without B-frames, combined encoder and decoder latency plummets to around 22 ms, well under a single frame (which for 30 fps video takes 33 ms to display). That’s low enough for even the most latency-sensitive applications.

How much will the lack of B-frames impact quality in the output encoding ladder? Once again, B-frames have delivered surprisingly little value in the tests that I’ve performed. You can read a good article on the subject?here , and access updated data?here ?(see page 22), which show less than a 1% quality difference between streams with and without B-frames. The bottom line, of course, is that if your application needs ultra-low latency, you have to prioritize that over any potential quality loss, though it’s good to know that few, if any, viewers will notice it.?

Returning to the thoughts that prompted this article, when my daughters have?their?kids, an endearing wish is that they implement parking lot rules in all relevant shopping trips. Given their progress to date, this may not occur in my lifetime. If you’re a live-streaming engineer, you have no similar excuse to ignore the corollary. If latency is critical, make sure you eliminate B-frames from your live-streaming workflows.

PS. The server referenced is the?Quadra Video 100 Server, which combines ten?Quadra ?video processing units (VPUs ) with a SuperMicro chassis driven by a 32-core CPU. Total cost should be around $20,000 in this configuration. Stay tuned for more details or?message us .

RELATED ARTICLES