An awful lot can happen in 10 cycles

An awful lot can happen in 10 cycles


Here is a high level analysis of a fault which occurred in our system a few months back. The interesting part of it, to me, was how many different configurations the fault went through in 10 cycles. This fault occurred on a 12 kV bus which feeds a load bus as well as a shunt capacitor bank for power factor correction. There is a current limiting reactor applied to reduce fault levels, and the fault started in the vicinity of this reactor (probably due to an animal climbing up the reactor).

No alt text provided for this image

The reactor is a three phase unit, with all three phases stacked on top of each other.

No alt text provided for this image

The oscillography above is a "RAW" event record from an SEL-351 relay. It is sampled at 16 samples/cycle and does not have the 60 Hz filtering that is applied before it is sent to the protection elements. The oscillography below is from a normal "Filtered" event record, sampled at 4 samples/cycle. Notice that the Filtered record is devoid of the DC offset visible on the current waveforms, as well as harmonics visible on the voltage waveforms. As a general rule, if you want to know what the relay is doing, look at the filtered event records, but if you want to know what the power system is doing, look at unfiltered, high resolution events.

No alt text provided for this image

We will now shift from looking at the waveforms to looking at current magnitudes, and break the event into 6 separate segments.

No alt text provided for this image

Segment A is our prefault. If we switch to phasor view, we can see that we have balanced currents and a good power factor.

No alt text provided for this image

Segment B is our original fault. We have current in two phases, voltage drop in the same two phases where the voltages move closer together, and we have no zero sequence current, so we tag this one as a phase to phase fault. The fault current is around 14 kA, which is intriguing because our fault current limiting reactors are supposed to limit 3 fault current to somewhere under 8 kA. This is where the physical layout of the system in question becomes invaluable. If we look at the drawing of the reactor, we can see that there is a location where the input of one phase and the output of the adjacent phase are not very far apart, so we hypothesize that perhaps this phase to phase fault was not on either the source or the load side of the reactor, but from the source side of one phase to the load side of another. By doing this, the phase to phase fault which would normally have a max current of VLL/(2 * Xr) (ignoring source impedance and arc resistance) can now have a max current of VLL/Xr, which works out to be around root 3 times the current you would get for a 3 phase fault after the reactor. 8 kA * sqrt(3) = 13.8 kA, so this hypothesis seems reasonable.

Segment C sees the fault type remain the same, but the fault current suddenly rise to around 36 kA. This is near the bus fault level before the reactor, so we can only assume that the fireball from the arc has now expanded enough to engulf the source terminal on both faulted phases.

Segment D is very interesting, although quite short-lived. Current in C phase suddenly rises, but not to bus fault levels, but around 12 kA. The explanation here is that the fireball has now engulfed C phase load side terminal, so we have a phase to phase fault on A and B phases on the source side of the reactor, and that is connected to the load side of the reactor on C phase. When you have a bolted phase to phase fault, the phase voltages collapse towards each other, and in the limit, each faulted phase voltage is of 0.5 pu magnitude and of an angle opposite to the unfaulted phase. So from the point of view of this A phase to fireball fault, we have 1.5 pu voltage across the current limiting reactor, which should result in around 1.5 * 8 kA = 12 kA of current. That makes sense. On to the next segment...

Disregard the image below. The image below that is the correct one.

This diagram is wrong, but I can't seem to delete it.
Ignore this image above. It is for a B-C fault.
No alt text provided for this image
This is the correct image for an A-B fault.

In segment E, we see neutral current, which up until now has remained solidly at zero, start to come up. This is our indication that the fireball has now expanded enough to intercept something grounded. The configuration of the system is starting to get pretty complicated here. We have A and B phases connected together directly to the fireball, C phase connected to the fireball through a current limiting reactor, and the whole throbbing flaming mass connected to ground. Coming up with an estimate of ground current for this fault is difficult since we have different impedances in each leg, but we can attempt using superposition to calculate it. Let's consider this to be the combination of an A-B-G fault with no current limiting reactors and a C-G fault with a current limiting reactor. We know the C-G fault should be around 8 kA, and Aspen OneLiner says 27 kA of 3I0 for the A-B-G fault. Since these currents are mostly antiphase to each other, we subtract them and get an estimate of 19 kA in the neutral, which doesn't quite agree with the measured 14 kA, but is maybe close enough to let us say that this is what happened.

No alt text provided for this image

Segment F sees all currents drop. This is due to ONE of the high side breakers clearing. One of the high side breakers (the one whose 52A contact is connected to IN102) interrupts and disconnects half of the fault current sources from the fault. A little over 4 cycles later, the breaker whose 52A contact is connected to IN101 follows and the fault is cleared. I don't know why the breaker was late tripping, but it has been looked into.

Going back to the layout drawing of the current limiting reactor, we can visualize the progression of the fault.

No alt text provided for this image

Now, let's look at a couple of tinier details from the event record.

No alt text provided for this image

Note how during the phase to phase fault on the source side of the current limiting reactor, that the A and B phase voltages are flat topped. This is an indication that there is a very small impedance between our VT and an arcing fault. Arcs have a negative incremental resistance characteristic (as the current increases, the resistance decreases), which results in arcs having a fairly consistent voltage drop regardless of the current through them. The voltage on C phase remains sinusoidal because the voltage drop is dominated by the current limiting reactor.

No alt text provided for this image

Here I have overlaid the Raw and the Filtered event record currents on the same chart. The Raw currents are the darker traces. Note how at the beginning, the Filtered record nearly leaves out the first half cycle, and at the end, how the digital filters ring for nearly an additional cycle after fault current has been interrupted.

Luis Bello

I am passionate about Electrical Engineering!

2 年

I didn’t read your post yet, but what interesting behavior of the fault you get there. Now I’m going to read it

回复
Nick Jarvinen

(All comments are my own and not my employer's.)

2 年

Thank you for the great post. It's about 7 years since I analysed transient recorder data to work out the truth of power system faults (we had a trickle budget to replace electromechanical relays with SEL magic). With the discrepancy of calculating 'In' in "E" do you think it would be closer if you broke it down to smaller sections and then carried out superpositions? Looking at the changing relationship between 'IA' and 'IB' I felt like it should work. There may be some impedance coming into the 'In"' path as well.

回复
Ralph Barone

Electrical Power Systems Engineer, specializing in utility transmission protection

2 年

Looking at the dimensioned drawing for the reactor (which I didn't post), the fault travelled 111 inches in 6.25 cycles. That's 2.82 m in 0.104 sec, which is 27 m/s, which is 97 km/hr. Things move quickly...

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ralph Barone的更多文章

  • (almost) All Hydro Plants Are Already Pumped Storage Plants

    (almost) All Hydro Plants Are Already Pumped Storage Plants

    I was reading a post by Doug Millner P.E.

    5 条评论
  • A CT that doesn't saturate

    A CT that doesn't saturate

    CTs are interesting compared to VTs or power transformers in that the latter two are designed to NOT saturate during…

    36 条评论
  • What's going on at the bottom of the B-H curve?

    What's going on at the bottom of the B-H curve?

    Current transformers are not complicated devices. At their simplest, they consist only of a ferromagnetic core with…

    9 条评论
  • The Topological Equivalence of Synchronous Machines and Core Type Transformers

    The Topological Equivalence of Synchronous Machines and Core Type Transformers

    I was reading a post yesterday from @Stephen Cary about how improvements to power transformers could be made by making…

    6 条评论
  • Negative excitation for a Synchronous Condenser

    Negative excitation for a Synchronous Condenser

    I had posted a question recently about the possibility of an out of step protection on a synchronous condenser actually…

    9 条评论
  • Another Interesting Event

    Another Interesting Event

    This event occurred about a decade ago in one of our 230 kV substations. Motor operated disconnect switch 2D3 was…

    16 条评论
  • A Very Interesting Event

    A Very Interesting Event

    Here is an interesting event that happened a while ago. With the benefit of hindsight, I could probably write this up…

    35 条评论
  • The Mysteries of the 5-position Reclose Mode Selector Switch

    The Mysteries of the 5-position Reclose Mode Selector Switch

    A while ago, somebody had asked me about the 5 position reclose mode selector switch which we had applied to all of our…

    8 条评论
  • Building a Custom RAS in a Single Protective Relay

    Building a Custom RAS in a Single Protective Relay

    It's Sunday night and I thought it might be of interest to some people on LinkedIn to go through the design of a custom…

    3 条评论
  • Here's my simple question...

    Here's my simple question...

    In one of the LinkedIn groups I belong to, somebody asked "How do I set this 50/51 relay?". A very simple question, no?…

    4 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了