Avoiding outsourcing failure part 2 - Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
Dave Jones MCIPS
Procurement leader with extensive experience in several sectors | Head of / director | Brings collaboration, improvement and pace
So you ran a great tender process, signed the deal and are good to go. In many ways the work starts now yet so very often businesses do not have a consistent supplier relationship management (SRM) framework for managing their various deals and relationships.
Procurement will often complete the contract and hand it over to the business (some would say throw over the fence) not getting involved again for 3 - 10 years or when there is a problem with the contract.
Most board members will be fully behind anything that ultimately gives them a competitive edge, drives innovation and increases revenue. SRM is a great opportunity to do this and move beyond the sourcing focus of some procurement teams.
In this article I cover the basics of SRM. I will provide you with a simple framework I have used several times that you could implement at your own organisation. The framework has a lot more detail so happy to discuss separately if anyone is interested.
Benefits
I could write a whole article articulating the benefits of investing in managing your supplier relationships and for the purposes of this article have picked out just a few :
- Drive innovation - through regular engagement with key suppliers you will get to hear about innovations and ideas for improvement potentially faster than your competitors.
- Aligned messaging - suppliers will often get mixed messages from your side which will leave them confused about where to focus. A proper programme ensures there is clarity on the initiatives you will work on together.
- Reward positive relationships - you should reward those suppliers who are performing well, helping you implement initiatives to bring more revenue and lower your costs.
- Address issues quickly - have clarity on peer to peer relationships in both of your organisations to ensure the right discussions happen quickly in the event of an issue
Getting started
For the purposes of this article I have simplified a framework I have used several times over the years into a three stage process :
- Who is important?
- What roles are there?
- Making it all happen
Who is important?
A four box model is very useful in segmenting your suppliers broadly into 4 boxes. This allows you to prioritise your strategic relationships and put your energies where there is maximum impact. Suppliers in each segment should have a different management framework ensuring most investment in the top right relationships.
Getting into a room with stakeholders (virtually for now) with a matrix like this one and a post it note for each supplier is a great way to debate the relative importance of suppliers by sticking them on the matrix.
You will relatively quickly identify suppliers in the top right quadrant which are the ones to focus and pilot an SRM programme initially. There is sometimes a temptation to implement SRM with too many suppliers rather than focussing on where you will get the maximum return.
You can also agree an approach to how you will manage suppliers in each box which I will cover later in this article.
What roles are there?
In addition to identifying the most important suppliers to your organisation I would also recommend that you define and agree the key roles involved in your supplier relationships and broadly the expectations each role in managing the relationship.
- Exec sponsor - for suppliers in your top right quadrant I definitely recommend having a single board member responsible for owning the relationship. This might cause an interesting debate about which board member owns the relationship but one worth having. The exec sponsor is there to foster a peer to peer relationship with the supplier, to influence strategies and ensure positive escalation of future issues.
- Relationship manager - owns the relationship on a day to day basis. Their role is to explore opportunities of mutual benefit, drive improvement initiatives and generally have their finger on the pulse of what is happening with the supplier
- Performance lead - managing the day to day operational performance of the supplier within the organisation. Service levels, improvement initiatives and other key information
- Contract manager - commercially and legally manages the contract
- Other roles - depending on the supplier you might have a commercial lead, technical architect lead etc.
So why formalise the roles? It is so important that people understand their roles in a supplier relationship. Suppliers will know who to speak to about particular issues and importantly get aligned messages from your business.
Bringing it all together
Once you have decided how to segment your suppliers and the roles involved in the relationship it is time to bring everything together. Deciding on a standard way of working for each segment for example is a good idea for example : how often meetings should happen and whether an exec sponsor is needed. It is also worth building standard templates and eventually possibly a system if you prove the business case in your pilot.
Thanks for reading. I hope this is a useful basic summary of SRM. I have several examples of implementing SRM along with a more detailed framework. I would be happy to discuss this further with anyone.
Here is a link to part 1 of my article which covered the phase pre-contract
https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/6-outsourcing-mistakes-how-avoid-them-dave-jones/
Global Engineering Commodity Manager Intel Corp
4 年Extremely relevant, especially in highly regulated, and segmented environments when turning business over to the "business" and letting what may be. Have seen this all too often, and the most cogent of saves is the bit about simply analyzing those areas where the biggest spend or risk might be and apply SRM there. Good article.
Supplier Diversity Tech Leader - CEO & Founder, Kaleida: Award winning B2B Marketplace for Tenders. Connecting Procurement to SMEs and Diverse Suppliers.
4 年Impressively written, punchy article. What does a good Supplier/Procurement relationship look like? We too are finding an emerging requirement for better SRM reigns supreme with Procurement. And to this effect, www.Kaleida.co has been built to enhance the digital collaboration & relationship building between Buyers and Suppliers. As a former H/o Sales (12 years), our/my skill was forming and sustaining relationships. This would typically be with the 'Business'. Key decision makers and strategic influencers. Not to speak for or on behalf of all Sales professionals, but the sales profession could do better with actually partnering with Procurement and not seeing them just as facilitators. Account Managers focused on the End Users. Driving adoption and capturing enhancement request to encourage contract renewals. Thought provoking.
Thanks Dave Jones for the insightful read!
Good read. We would love to publish it on our Knowledge Hub section if you are ok. That’s the section where you don’t have to Register or Subscribe. We believe in knowledge sharing at no cost.
Talent Acquisition Consultant
4 年Business owners and small businesses in the West and EU will now seriously consider outsourcing and remote working. One main reason why they have been reluctant in the past is due to overwhelm. How to go about it, who to hire, costing and thinking it is a complex process...its easy if you know how to go about it.