Autonomy, a casualty of poor job design

Autonomy, a casualty of poor job design

It should come as no surprise to those who understand employee productivity and engagement that depriving individuals of autonomy, in carrying out their jobs, is an ill-conceived notion. While traditional management approaches (think Taylor), centred on reducing autonomy and increasing standardisation, may have some relevance in tasks involving the assembly and quantification of widgets, its value diminishes significantly beyond that scope.

In roles that involve any form of interaction with humans and necessitate independent thinking, the perceived advantages of reducing autonomy and increasing standardisation, intentionally or otherwise, lose their significance. To put it plainly, reducing autonomy can have adverse repercussions on employee productivity and, over the long term, on their overall wellbeing. In accordance with the principles of self-determination theory, autonomy stands as one of the fundamental psychological needs that drive human behaviour and contributes to overall happiness. When employees are granted autonomy, they tend to experience greater job satisfaction, engagement, motivation, and creativity, while simultaneously enduring less stress, burnout, and turnover.

Leaders and managers must give serious consideration to the ramifications of job design, task allocation, and workload management on employee autonomy and in turn wellbeing. Not only do organisations stand to gain improved performance from their employees when autonomy levels are elevated, but employees will also feel more empowered, motivated, and physically and mentally healthier.

Furthermore, it is important that job design is not carried out in isolation, without the input, advice, and guidance of HR professionals. Regrettably, there is a tendency among managers to adopt a 'I know boats' approach, leaving HR professionals to address the resulting issues or unfairly bearing the blame for sub-optimal people management outcomes.

Margaret Joseph

Writing on People | Patriotism | Culture | History

1 年

Excellent piece. Enduring question of whether a job serves a person/organisation or a person/organisation serves the job! In an ideal world, the job would be adaptable to allow the fullest expression of the person's gifts and expertise.

Dr. Lisa Conway

Assistant Secretary - First Nations Employment Policy & Programs Branch

1 年

That lost autonomy also decreases the opportunity for organisations to leverage the benefit of diverse perspectives of their workforce. Great article Michael Nelson ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Michael Nelson的更多文章

  • Information overload, it's a thing.

    Information overload, it's a thing.

    I’ve been struck by the number of conversations I’ve had and articles (including snippets of books) that I’ve read in…

    9 条评论
  • Don’t forget what it takes to be a leader.

    Don’t forget what it takes to be a leader.

    Our working environments are becoming increasingly complex, and the pace of change continues to accelerate. This means…

    14 条评论
  • Investing in Good Work

    Investing in Good Work

    There is a huge amount of time spent on discussing concepts such as burnout, psychosocial health and wellbeing. Of…

    1 条评论
  • Working well from home requires solid foundations

    Working well from home requires solid foundations

    While working from home isn’t a new concept, some businesses have been forced to embrace it more rapidly than they…

    5 条评论

社区洞察