Auto Industry Scales Back EV Investments to Adapt to Consumer Demand

Note: This is the lead story to the latest edition to The Rising Tide, a weekly newsletter bringing you news and analysis that you can use. Subscribe via Substack (not LinkedIn) for full access. Get your first month free. https://barberd.substack.com/

Ford Motor Co.'s recent decision to cancel its planned electric family-hauler SUV and delay the launch of its next-generation electric pickup truck not only signals a profound shift in the company's approach to electric vehicles, but it also highlights the evolving dynamics within the industry.

Ford's canceled electric SUV, once hailed as a groundbreaking model and described by Ford CEO Jim Farley as a “personalized bullet train,” reflects a strategic pivot in response to emerging market realities and financial pressures.

The shift in Ford’s plans is consistent with the overall auto industry, which is facing growing, but slower-than-expected adoption of EVs, as well as automakers not being able to achieve expected profitability on the vehicles.

Ford said it will also delay the production of its highly anticipated "T3" electric pickup truck by 18 months, pushing its launch to late 2027. Instead, the company said it will develop a new electric commercial van, scheduled for release in 2026, followed by a midsized electric pickup truck.

“We’re quite convinced that the highest adoption rates for electric vehicles will be in the affordable segment on the lower size-end of the range,” Marin Gjaja, Ford’s chief operating officer for its Model e EV unit, told CNBC. Gjaja framed the adjustment as an "insurance policy" to ensure Ford's competitiveness in a rapidly evolving EV market.

The company’s pivot towards smaller, more affordable models aims to address the high costs associated with larger electric vehicles, which are burdened by expensive battery systems and infrastructure limitations.

Financial Strain

Ford's decision to cancel the three-row SUV and delay the T3 pickup truck comes with significant financial implications. The company anticipates up to $1.9 billion in costs, including a $400 million write-down related to the canceled SUV and up to $1.5 billion in additional expenses.

This financial strain is compounded by the fact that Ford's current EV lineup, which includes the Mustang Mach-E crossover and the F-150 Lightning, has yet to achieve profitability. Ford's Model e operations reported a loss of nearly $2.5 billion in the first half of the year and a total loss of $4.7 billion in 2023.

A Recalibration of the Industry

The broader automotive industry is also witnessing a recalibration of EV strategies. Major manufacturers such as General Motors, Volkswagen, and Mercedes-Benz have recently scaled back their electric vehicle plans, reflecting a realization that the rapid adoption of EVs, initially projected to accelerate in the early 2020s, has not materialized as anticipated.

GM has been tackling cost challenges, which has led to production target adjustments despite a continued commitment to the goal of electrifying its entire product range by 2035. Mercedes-Benz has pushed back its goal for electric vehicles to comprise 50 percent of its sales by 2030, from an initial target of 2025, amid slowing demand

Surveys indicate that up to 50 percent of U.S. consumers are open to the idea of purchasing electric vehicles, but high purchase prices and concerns about charging infrastructure remain significant barriers to widespread adoption.

Investment Delay in Tennessee

Ford's shift in strategy highlights the challenges faced by automakers as they navigate the complex landscape of EV production. The delay of the new EV truck factory in Tennessee, now scheduled to open in 2027, represents Ford’s largest investment in its 120-year history. This delay underscores the financial pressures and strategic recalibrations necessitated by the slower-than-expected market growth.

Bank of America analyst John Murphy noted the implications of Ford's decision: “This is clearly a tough decision in the short term, but we think it makes sense in the medium- to long-term given what will likely be subpar economics in the electric SUV market.”

The high costs of larger EVs, coupled with pricing pressures and consumer reluctance to pay a premium for electric models, have driven this strategic shift.

Additionally, Ford’s pivot towards smaller EVs and hybrids reflects broader industry trends as automakers adapt to evolving market conditions and regulatory requirements. Hybrid vehicles are seen as an intermediate option for many car drivers, as they help improve fuel efficiency among fossil fuel-based cars in general.

New federal emissions regulations in the U.S., adopted earlier this year, will require automakers to incorporate a substantial number of electric vehicles into their lineups by the end of the decade.

Emergence of a Potential Threat in Mexico

Meanwhile, competition from global EV manufacturers, particularly Chinese companies like BYD, poses a significant challenge. These manufacturers leverage low-cost supply chains and cheaper battery technologies to offer competitive pricing, intensifying the pressure on Western automakers.

BYD has narrowed its list of finalists for the location of a manufacturing plant in Mexico down to three states and is reviewing a range of proposed incentives from them, according to the firm's country head.

The plant will serve the Mexican market. BYD has previously said it was not eyeing an entry into the U.S. market.

Blocked from the U.S. by tariffs, Mexico has emerged as a hot spot for Chinese EVs. U.S. officials worry this could be a part of a larger strategy by Chinese automakers to skirt trade restrictions and enter the American market. Last year, China was the leading car supplier to Mexico, exporting $4.6 billion worth of vehicles to the country, according to the Mexican Ministry of Economy.

Suppliers Affected

The ripple effects of Ford's strategic adjustments extend beyond the company itself. Major suppliers like Magna International and Dana, which had prepared to produce components for the now-canceled electric SUV, are facing repercussions.

Magna is seeking new customers and vehicle lines to offset its investments, while Dana has revised its sales forecasts for EV-related components due to the shifting focus in the automotive sector.

Focus on Smaller and More Affordable

Ford's decision to focus on smaller, more affordable EVs marks a significant departure from its earlier emphasis on larger electric vehicles, such as the F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck.

Farley has observed that “It’s exactly the opposite for EVs. The larger the vehicle, the bigger the battery, the more pressure on margin because customers will not pay a premium” for an electric vehicle over a gasoline model. This realization has driven Ford’s strategic pivot towards more economically viable and cost-effective electric vehicle solutions.

Ford's focus towards smaller, more affordable models and hybrids, reflects a broader trend in the industry as manufacturers adapt to market realities and financial pressures. As the automotive industry continues to navigate these challenges, automakers find themselves needing to balance their investments in electric vehicles with practical considerations of consumer demand and economic viability.

An Industry Evolving

Despite the current challenges, the EV revolution is not faltering; it's merely evolving at a more deliberate pace than initially anticipated by some carmakers.

Industry initiatives aim to address the barriers to mainstream EV adoption, such as the formation of a new company by seven automakers to build 30,000 fast chargers starting in 2024.

As automakers continue to navigate the evolving EV landscape, a balanced approach incorporating multiple powertrain options, including hybrids, is likely the key to meeting consumer demand and ensuring the long-term success of the electric vehicle transition.

Subscribe to The Rising Tide at https://barberd.substack.com/