Attitude vs Experience: Oh, are we creating just another workplace myth?

Attitude vs Experience: Oh, are we creating just another workplace myth?

Occasionally, I encounter LinkedIn messages aimed at a specific audience, often attempting to sound profound or optimistic but missing the subject's essence. In companies today, many issues arise from not addressing the root of problems and resorting to superficial solutions. One statement I came across, "Hiring kind people with a positive attitude is better than hiring negative people with experience," feels somewhat offensive yet intriguing to me as an experienced professional. It's a unique perspective that shouldn't be dismissed, as even those who hold it will, with time and experience, appreciate the depth and nuances that experience brings. Let's dive into a more nuanced analysis of this statement.

What's Okay with this statement:

  1. Emphasises the importance of a positive work environment.
  2. Highlights the value of kindness and positive attitude in team dynamics.
  3. Suggests that soft skills can be as crucial as technical skills.
  4. Encourages hiring for cultural fit.
  5. Reflects an understanding of the long-term impact of employee attitudes on company morale.

What's Problematic with this statement:

  1. Oversimplifies the hiring process by neglecting the importance of experience.
  2. Implies a false dichotomy between kindness and experience.
  3. Overlooks the potential of experienced individuals to contribute positively.
  4. Doesn't acknowledge the possibility of developing a positive attitude in experienced professionals.
  5. It Might lead to undervaluing the role of skill and experience in complex job roles.


The idea behind this thesis for someone working in HR suggests a focus on building a positive organizational culture and team dynamics. It emphasizes soft skills like kindness and a good attitude, crucial for a collaborative and supportive work environment. The thesis reflects a belief that a positive attitude can significantly impact team morale and productivity, potentially outweighing the immediate benefits of experience alone. The approach prioritizes long-term team cohesion and employee well-being over short-term skills and expertise.

Neglecting experience in favor of attitude doesn't necessarily go against company values, but it does depend on the specific values and goals of the company. If a company highly values innovation, technical expertise, or specific skill sets, the overlooking experience might contradict those values. However, if the company prioritizes a positive work culture, collaboration, and employee well-being, then emphasizing attitude aligns with those values. It's about finding a balance that supports the company's operational needs and cultural aspirations.

No specific types of companies universally do not want experienced people. The preference for experience versus attitude largely depends on the individual company's values, goals, and the specific job roles they are looking to fill, like "call centers," "driving," or some other business where experience is something that is automated human behavior. Some startups or innovative companies might prioritize a fresh perspective or cultural fit over industry experience. In contrast, highly technical fields or senior management roles typically require significant experience. Each company assesses its unique needs to determine the balance between experience and other qualities like attitude.

HR professionals promoting and prioritizing attitude over experience are not inherently wrong. Their approach can be aligned with specific organizational cultures or strategies emphasizing cultural fit, adaptability, and potential over existing skill sets. However, this approach should be balanced with the role's needs and the company's goals. Effective HR management often involves finding the right mix of attitude, potential, and experience to suit the unique context of the organization and the specific job requirements.

Are HR employees intimidated when encountering professionals or more experienced workers, primarily because they need to interact differently with them compared to new hires or interns? It's not typically a matter of HR professionals being afraid of experienced people. Their focus on attitude over experience can stem from a strategic decision based on the company's specific needs or culture. A positive attitude and cultural fit might be prioritized in some environments, particularly those emphasizing innovation, adaptability, and a strong team dynamic. However, this does not imply a fear of experienced individuals; it's more about aligning the workforce with the company's overarching goals and values.

While a positive attitude is essential for a healthy workplace culture and can contribute to employee motivation and team dynamics, it's insufficient to drive revenues, profits, or shareholder value. These financial outcomes are typically the result of a combination of factors, including experienced work, strategic planning, market conditions, and operational efficiency. Experience and skillful execution in business operations, along with a positive attitude, work collaboratively to drive financial success and growth in a company.

The key is to blend experience and a positive attitude, as they're not mutually exclusive. Challenges often require experienced, stress-resilient approaches. While positivity can lead to better outcomes, it alone doesn't solve core issues. Ideally, working in a problem-free, pressure-less company would be great, but realistically, the best approach is a mix of positivity and experience. Here are a few HR strategies to effectively integrate these elements in the workplace.

  1. Hiring Strategy: Look for candidates with the necessary experience and demonstrate a positive attitude during the hiring process.
  2. Training and Development: Invest in training programs that enhance technical and soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence.
  3. Mentorship Programs: Pair less experienced but positive-minded employees with experienced mentors to facilitate skill and attitude development.
  4. Performance Management: Incorporate attitude and experience in performance evaluations, encouraging a balance.
  5. Recognition and Rewards: Acknowledge and reward successful outcomes and the approach and attitude taken.
  6. Company Culture: Foster a company culture that values a positive attitude and professional expertise.
  7. Continuous Feedback: Provide regular feedback that focuses on both technical skills and behavioral aspects.

By implementing these strategies, a company can develop a workforce that is both skilled and maintains a positive, constructive attitude.

In conclusion, balancing a positive attitude with experience in the workplace is a nuanced and essential endeavor. In our discussion, we explored the importance of balancing knowledge and a positive attitude in the workplace. We discussed the role of HR in this context, the challenges in transitioning from founder-led to professional management, and the significance of maintaining a positive work culture while valuing experience. While positivity fosters a healthy work environment, the synergy with experience drives problem-solving and organizational success. HR's role in facilitating this balance is crucial, involving strategies that nurture both aspects of the workforce. Ultimately, this blend not only enhances individual performance but also contributes to the overall resilience and progress of the company. This approach reflects a modern understanding of a dynamic and effective workplace. The key takeaway is the need for a harmonious blend of soft skills and technical expertise and the crucial role of HR in fostering this balance for organizational success and growth.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Haris Karamovic的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了