Attempting to construct new African identities: subversion & stereotyping in District 9

District 9 (2009), a South African science fiction (sci-fi) film that garnered commercial and critical acclaim globally, was written and directed by writer/director Neill Blomkamp, co-written by Terri Tatchell and produced by Peter Jackson, was a noteworthy contribution to South African cinema specifically and the African Cinema space quite broadly. Starring acting talent and on-screen performing artists such as Sharlto Copley, Jason Cope and Nathalie Boltt. Director Neill Blomkamp’s filmography consists of 18 writing credits; from 2002 to 2021, including short films, miniseries and features films, 8 visual credits for some animation work, and some acting and editing credits as well (IMDB; List Film). He is most well-known for his directing feature titles, namely, District 9 (2009), Elysium (2013) and Chappie (2015). District 9 employs a mock-documentary aesthetic throughout, a conceptual fit for its satirical social commentary on belonging, nationalism, political identities, xenophobia and the lives of refugees, the film “is a loose allegory about apartheid and recent violence by South Africans against foreigners” (BBC 2009). The plot situates us in Johannesburg, South Africa, wherein an alien ship has landed in a township that is specifically called out to be, “outside of Johannesburg,” in the same way Khayelitsha, Langa, Gugulethu and Imizamo Yethu townships, among others, are too often intentionally described as being ‘outside’ of Cape Town when they could not be more in Cape Town than Camps Bay is. An outsider spaceship floats hauntingly above Johannesburg in a condition of latency, a large portion of the city is under its haze. Flight authorities of the public authority – MNU (Multi-National United), attack its border and find outsiders that are malnourished and needing safeguarding. They are made to live in the ghetto-slum of a Township town by the name of District 9. Protests emerge from encompassing residents as they broadcast their disgruntlement at the governmental officials for accommodating aliens when they are not recipients of the same kind of service delivery. MNU authorities think of an arrangement to migrate and detach the outsiders or somewhere in the vicinity called 'prawns' from their home of twenty years on Earth to a camp 24km from Johannesburg, away from society.

Wikus van de Merwe (Sharlto Copley), a MNU (Multi-National United) worker, is the one chosen to go District 9 and persuade the 'prawns' to sign the removal papers gave by MNU. One of Wikus' necessary evil is offering feline food to the outsiders in return for a consent to pass on their premises to another area – the outsiders love the tinned feline food. Through the course of the day, Wikus finds numerous weapons and apparatus that the outsiders have ownership of, in those disclosures, he inadvertently splashes a substance from a holder in a secret box in one of the outsider's homes his face, and before long turns out to be sick. After a few suggestive responses, Wikus starts to gradually transform into a 'prawn' outsider, very much like the ones he experienced and arraigned during the day. He does not get the assistance he needs, however rather Wikus is pursued by his own organization. The MNU claim they need him for a trial. Prawn weapon innovation is bio-designed so no one but they can use it, yet his always changing DNA has enabled him to use their insider facts, while his main interest is to become himself again and returning home to his spouse. He shows up all over, papers, radio broadcasts and TV, all looking for his where abouts, he has nobody to confide in. Wikus is an outcast in his own nation and no longer has confidence in the perspectives on the position he used to follow yet rather questions whether he's been living in obviously false or truth. This is when laws are broken, some of the time to incredible limits, turmoil oozes from a man once governed by request.

?

He missions to MNU central command with his new outsider companion, Christopher, to guarantee what is properly his from twenty years of work. However, cooperating, the two of them are in it for their own benefit. Wikus trusts Christopher can transform him back to a human by turning around the transforming system that has started from his harmed arm so he can get back to his significant other. Christopher's objective is getting the tubed liquid to use for the boat under his shack and get once again to the mother transport that buoys above Johannesburg. Before the finish of the mission, they understand how comparable their objectives are nevertheless just one can be satisfied in the term of the film. Through warding off MNU and the Nigerians, Wikus penances himself and his prosperity to assist Christopher with getting back to his child and to the mother transport. He should trust that Christopher will get and transform him once again to a human once more, while the hereditary embed of the outsider liquid quickly accelerates to transform him into one of them, a prawn. Before the finish of the film, a nearby on a prawn making a metal blossom, same as the one his significant other gets, shows up. Really at that time the crowd can reason what befell Wikus, all things considered, he preferred making wonderful things for his significant other (Blomkamp 2019).

?

Nobody in the film truly knows how or why the outsider boat halted over Johannesburg, however there was a ton of hypothesis, nobody truly minded to research. The people were inviting right away, however when the outsiders took advantage of the people's assets, the contention started. This perspective shows the absence of understanding and unyielding nature that the characters had for the animals. This was the ascent of the bias and xenophobia in the film, the people accepted they did not have similar social standards, qualities and practices that the outsiders had. This significance put the people and outsiders on two separate levels of the board – they had contrasts which human instinct could not identify with – the characters closed (Blomkamp 2019).

?

Rivalry existed between all the person bunches included – everybody consistently has objectives they need satisfied that are not really to the greatest advantage of others. In the film, MNU is in circuitous contest with the Nigerians to get the outsider's weaponry – a stereotype of associating foreign nationals of Nigerian descent with illegal activity. The two gatherings are in quest for power by possessing new species-explicit innovation that is unfathomable in military advancements nowadays. However, the outsiders are dealt with like savages and brutes, they are mechanically higher on the size of advancement and development then the people. An inquiry can be raised on which animal is more advanced, the homosapien or the outsider 'prawn'? Since the outsiders are on the place that is known for the people, the people will have control and charge of the unreasonable outsiders, as the MNU infers when the outsiders reject their removal. In the first place Wikus articulates the accompanying words, "This is our land, they should go," (Blomkamp 2019) bringing to light some of the metafictional elements of public discourse about land rights and who belongs where, and by consequence, who does not belong. This importance simply shows how control, double-dealing and defilement plays on the two sides of the boards. The outsiders advantage from getting a position of home and food from the Township while NMU and Nigerian neighbours trade and on occasion seize outsider weaponry (Blomkamp 2019).

?

The film plays astutely by returning a group of people's affection and disdain all through the film. This shows the idea of both the characters and crowd to make up their psyches on discernment at face esteem. The consideration shifts from the crowd preferring NMU and their objective to remove the outsiders, to preferring the outsiders and Wikus to obliterate the NMU group that is out exploit them. One might say that Wikus reflects a large portion of the feelings the crowd feels towards the characters all through the term of the film. We chuckle when he pokes fun at the detonating eggs making a popping sound like popcorn, stress when he starts to transform and is dismissed by society and cheer when he shoots and detonates his colleagues with large equipment and the assistance of his new companion Christopher the outsider. This significance plays on the passionate moulding of the human brain with how we see life in the development that happen in District 9 (Blomkamp 2009).

?

The mission to oust the outsiders out of District 9 is supposed to be for the assurance of the local area that encompasses it however dread in the abilities of the outsiders is additionally apparent from the discoveries of MNU regarding the incredible hardware they construct. MNU is accordingly mindful of the outsiders' scholarly capacities thus they remove what they accept is their most valued belonging and assurance of force for themselves. Then again, the Nigerians hold offbeat convictions of acquiring the 'force' of the outsiders by devouring them. This is the place where the subject of gaining power is generally apparent, showing the covetous idea of humanity who are most noticeably awful off then the outsiders for this situation. The self-centred things humanity is prepared to do, when the attitude is tainted, to acquire some type of benefit, whatever the activity, is an underscored subject here addressing moral issues and ethical concerns (Blomkamp 2019).

?

There is a clear type of bias, isolation and segregation in the film that can measure up to that of Apartheid South Africa. It nearly shapes a cunning moral story where the outsiders for this situation are the racialised minority bunch with announcements all around the city that express their limitations to specific spots. In the hour of Apartheid, the bigoted philosophy and talk managed the dreaded, abhorred, scorned 'Other', thus too in current District 9 (Butler 1993). Sufficiently intriguing, while Wikus may return home, and keeping in mind that the Aliens may take off to their far-off planet with seven moons, the Nigerians are the genuine outsiders of the film, with their frightful methods of haggling with the weak outsiders and later, with the power of MNU, transforming District 9 into a disaster area (Butler 1993). The subject here, plays with philosophies that are held against specific gatherings in the public eye, placing them in a crate and generalizing them without any contemplations to the individual, and therefore instigating clashes that emerge from the horn impact (setting of particular regrettable underlying meanings to an entire framework).

?

The above disclosure seizes to disappoint Wikus in the film once he figures out how to trust Christopher the outsider, thus does he. A kinship structures. Enthusiastic ties are brought into the world as the two characters from various universes, in a real sense, go to a comprehension of how comparable they are with their upsides of family and home. The topic of compassion surfaces as Wikus sets his own requirements to the side to assist Christopher with getting back to his child and return home. The crowd understands the substantial surface of the entire film, keeping away from to judge one more dependent on a reason of assumed worth but instead figuring out how to placing oneself in the shoes of one more to share a typical level in the soul of sharing feelings. Wikus van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley), a jumpy pencil-pusher who is placed accountable for the removals, helped by the way that his dad in-law is a top dog wat MNU. He coincidentally finds an unfamiliar item over the span of serving notice, breathes in it and rapidly gets an outsider infection that starts to change his DNA, beginning with a foul hook rather than a hand. And afterward things truly start to get insane! Wikus is compelled to go on the run, out of nowhere the most esteemed human alive as the only one ready to work the outsider weapons; he's pursued by MNU and by the Nigerian hooligans who have settled in District 9, where he should attempt to evade arrest by hiding at. Writing for The New York Observer (11 August 2019) Sara Vilkomerson was complimentary of the film, dubbing it the “most exciting science fiction movie to come along in ages; definitely the most thrilling film of the summer; and quite possibly the best film I’ve seen all year” back then. She quite rightly points out how the Western trope of Euro-America being the centre of all activation is subverted within this film, as the aliens have not stopped over Brussels, Washington DC, or England, but rather Johannesburg, as Vilkomerson writers, “there is no time to say, ‘Wait, there are aliens from outer space in South Africa?’—you just have to go with it,” as any audience should, because the same levels of suspension of disbelief should be pulled into the cinematic narrative. Peter Bradshaw (2009), reviewing the film for The Guardian wrote quite critically about the meaning of situating the story in a post-apartheid, postcolonial city, thus it becomes a sci-fi with polarizing satirical social commentary on the state of affairs, that is both subversion in one sense, but also relies on tropes, stereotypes and oversimplification:

?

“Johannesburg, South Africa, a location that simultaneously enables and renders very self-conscious the movie's satirical dimension. Only a few years after apartheid was abolished in South Africa … well, there they go, you see, bringing it in all over again, criminalising and dehumanising an entire populace with a Soweto-like township and petty discrimination in public parks, restaurants, everything. But just as no one in EastEnders watches EastEnders, no one notices the apartheid parallel here and gasps: ‘Hah ah-roneeck!’ In this movie, evil whites are in charge, albeit as officers of the all-powerful corporation – and such corporations are often introduced in dystopian sci-fi in a way that sneakily permits the film-maker to avoid getting tangled up in recognisable political realities. Earthling race-politics do not appear to exist, and the only important black character in this movie is a Nigerian crime-lord with cannibal tendencies: yet the whites, presiding over their alien experimentation labs, are as bad, or worse” (2009).

?

While there are reports of a sequel to District 9, aptly dubbed to be called District 10, which will be based against the backdrop of America’s recent politics in Donald Trump’s tenure as President, which might be the perfect setting for a dystopic, satirical sci-fi film (Child 2021).

?

?

??????????? Neill Blomkamp's film District 9 (2009) as far as digressive tasks that are done on a scope of bodies in the film: instinctive, institutional and classificatory, just as assemblages of the constructed climate. The instinctive body of the hero Wikus van de Merwe is demonstrated to be the nexus of an implying framework wherein, through metaphorical meaning, various bodies in the film are connected to one another and to current and authentic referents (Marks & Bezzoli 2000:262-278). The activities of tainting and hybridisation, wretchedness and uprooting, and cutting off and dismantling, are examined as far as their importance in a South African postcolonial structure (Marks & Bezzoli 2000:262-278). It is shown how these activities, agent of the ruses of politically-sanctioned racial segregation, are influenced microcosmically on Wikus' body, and questions are raised in regards to the subsequent dream of discipline and reclamation that works out inside the mimicked universe of the film (Marks & Bezzoli 2000:262-278).

?

On the line between a slumland and the never-ending suburbia of Johannesburg, Wikus? van de Merwe wolfs down the thick earthy coloured substance of a jar of feline food. His face registers the frantic happiness of a hankering fulfilled, yet part of the way through the tin he bends with aversion, tossing it into the veld. 'Ag fok, man!' (Blomkamp 2009). He spits a little white article into his hand: a tooth. Another tooth comes free, and clatters against the first in quite a while palm as his hand begins to shake. In the first days he had begun to discharge dark blood from his nose, lost fingernails, crapped in his jeans at an unexpected party and spewed dark fluid over the cake, grown an outsider hook from his left arm and scarcely circumvented having his organs reaped in an underground research centre. Neill Blomkamp's District 9 (2009) is a tale about bodies, the majority of which don't toll well over the span of the film (Marks & Bezzoli 2000:262-278).

?

Politically-sanctioned racial segregation in South Africa's foul frenzy of disparity and bias was a particularly ideal hopping off point for a tragic parody on xenophobia that it's difficult to envision a continuation functioning admirably in an alternate area, even one that can possibly address a similarly toxic reverberation chamber (Marks & Bezzoli 2000:262-278). While 1980s Jo'burg was a startling spot, its residents didn't attempt to storm their own peak of government to attempt to upset a political decision in the wake of being aggravated up by a dictator rabble rouser (Diawara 2007:74-81). The possibility that District 10 could be founded on a second from American history does not appear to very count with the film's reasonable Jo'burg setting – the film's title alludes to the new region where the excess Earthbound prawns were moved to toward the finish of the primary film (Diawara 2007:74-81). There is a contention that new US history is more tragic than anything Hollywood science fiction producers have delivered at any point ever on the big screen, however, fortunately for American vote-based system, Donald Trump's conservative crowd couldn't get hold of as numerous meched-out exo-suits (Diawara 2007:74-81) .

?

District 9 appears to offer a vicious and dimly amusing, South African interpretation of the platitude of the 'white man who crosses over ‘with the hapless and buffoonish Wikus van de Merwe, as the hero. The 'unfiltered' feel of the film is suggestive of 1980s politically sanctioned racial segregation period furthermore, TV pictures of battle and struggle, a surface that has been globally saleable for quite a long time as 'really' South African. This dream of 'white recovery' works out in a mind-boggling design, as the film comprises of interwoven conflicting modalities: verité narrative style and sci-fi, awfulness and humorous joke, recovery film and splatter flick. These modalities themselves address a in some cases camp personifying of filmic styles, including 'master' editorial from staff of the fictitious 'College of Kempton Park'; as the film unfurls, plainly most components in the film, not in particular the human and outsider characters, share this component of personification. The nuance of the personification goes from the finely noticed subtleties conveyed by Sharlto Copley as Wikus, to the ludicrous roughness of the 'Nigerian' group, however the general impact is that of a sort of manikin theatre of generalizations.

?

The progressive breaking down and change of the group of Wikus van de Merwe is a focal subject in District 9. The deficiency of fingernails and teeth frames part of an inventory of substantial debacles yet are worked out in District 9 with equivalent proportions of loathsomeness and satire. The numerous groupings of distinction (self/other, race, class, identity, species) introduced in District 9 can be viewed as collections of arrangement. The boundaries of these bodies are characterized and kept up with through the ID (or assembling) and reification of signifiers of contrast, and frameworks of characterization and control. The physical, instinctive body is addressed most halfway by the white, male collection of Wikus van de Merwe, an exaggeration of a blundering politically-sanctioned racial segregation time Afrikaner administrator; the insectile body of the outsider or Prawn, abounding with signifiers of terrible otherness, turns into a central contradiction. The boundary of this instinctive body is the skin, its upkeep is crucial for the wellbeing of the body, and its bursting is related with torment and ghastliness. In any case, the instinctive dark body, as a clearer representative post-politically sanctioned racial segregation dance hall accomplice for the white body, is never brought into fresh concentration, however, is fairly carried into the emblematic economy of the film.

?

In lieu of a sharper showdown with the capability of the instinctive, Black body inside the film's emblematic structure, the body of the outsider takes a sharp furthermore, advantageous situation of multivalence. The outsider body turns into a state of build-up for all the repulsiveness of the other, from white/black bigotry to xenophobia – a point which feels somewhat worked in District 9 in contrast with Blomkamp's early short film Alive in Joburg (2005), which filled in as a model for District 9. The Prawns are, it is accentuated right off the bat in District 9, oppressed, taken advantage of, dreaded and ridiculed by the dark municipality inhabitants, while white scholastic 'pundits' thoughtfully make sociological inferences from a protected distance. These relations reflect a portion of the upsetting occasions identified with xenophobia that have as of late unfurled in South Africa. While the most exceedingly terrible ejections of xenophobic brutality in 2008 occurred when District 9 was underway, Alive in Joburg had at this point set up Blomkamp's advantage in referring to politically-sanctioned racial segregation bigotry and xenophobia inside a similar realistic casing. In Alive in Joburg, occupants of a ruined municipality shack land voice their doubts and question of 'outsiders' in short vignettes that totally express xenophobic feelings; this rendering is again utilized in District 9 to move the awkward experience with otherness from a white/Black socio-politcal issue to a more extensive discourse around racialized regimes of representation (Diawara 2007:74-81).

?

The film fails, within its own visual and textual language, to manage its representation of the Black body and Black people; the Black characters remain either foundation defenders (Fundiswa Mhlanga, the learner MNU specialist assumed in a passive part by Mandla Gaduka) or over-the top personifications (like Obesandjo, the head of the 'Nigerians', played by Eugene Khumbanyiwa). The awkwardness of these exaggerations has drawn a lot of fury, depending on voodoo/soldier of fortune/man-eater figures of speech, regardless of the slack conceded by the film' substrate of incongruity.

?

Notwithstanding, when we investigate the emblematic space involved by the outsiders, furthermore, the signifiers that amass around Wikus' excruciating materially change, the collection is drawn dominatingly from generalized white working-class biases about Blackness, the Black experience and structural poverty. As one observer has noted: 'If the Nigerians are a return to the negative provincial generalization of the "crude" African, the "prawns" compared to both the old generalization and another one, no more positive for being state-of-the-art: that of the lazy, brutal, and degenerate metropolitan African lumpenproletariat' (Moses et al. 2010:159). Prawns are seen hacking up cows' heads in a building up vignette which is outlined alongside comparative impressions (outsiders scavenging through trash or battling about garbage) that appear to be calculated to impart a horrible profanity. Simultaneously, cows' head or iskopo is a customary African dish, and it is generally to be expected to discover these smiling treats sold on the road in less wealthy Black metropolitan regions in Johannesburg and its municipalities, along with chicken feet and digestive organs. The Prawns, then, at that point, appear to be not exactly completely general signifiers of otherness, but rather doppelgangers of the common Black laborers or helpless shack occupants who highlight insignificantly in the film without being brought into the spotlight. In the event that we follow this thoroughly considered when taking a gander at Wikus' changes and clashed cravings that create as the outsider DNA invades his body, there is a sense operating in the figurative sense of metaphor.

?

??????????? In Stuart Hall’s chapter entitled, “The Spectacle of the Other”, in the book Representation: Cultural and Signifying Practices (1997) unpacks the cultural, economic and socio-political phenomena of representing people, places and things, situating it with the conceptual and discursive framework of centralizing difference, or the Other and othering, and the consequence of difference making, as it manifests through fascination, fantasy, and, or fetishism’ and stereotyping in other instances. From the times of the trans-Atlantic slave trade to the contemporary form of imperialism, neoliberal neocolonialism, difference has been a constant thematic concern as part of the meaning-making processes in culture across various politic identities, including but not limited to, gender, race, sex, sexual orientation, (dis)ability, and socio-economic class. The systematic and systemic colonization of the conceptual global South broadly, and the African continent in particular, produced a by-product of a myriad of cultures and thus innumerable representations in popular culture and mass media communication platforms and technologies.

?

These Eurocentric, imperialist texts and visual images and their inferred thematic concerns were distributed across the globalized world through the commodification and commercialization of popular culture through marketing and advertising (Franssinelli 2017:331-334). These imperialistic spectacles reinforced and reiterated difference and thus produced Othering, not only through typification, but more malevolently, through stereotyping, reductionism, essentialization and oversimplifying entire groups of people, mainly across racial lines, but also across gender, sex, and socio-economic class (Franssinelli 2017:331-334). Within the scope and context of gender and sex, these mass media communication sites became theatres to exhibit the notion of domesticity, and the gender roles within the ideological state apparatus of the family structure, wherein women were relegated to simply child bearing and rearing, while men could participate in socio-economic and political activity, and in so doing created unequal micro power dynamics within the homestead, but that pixelated into the macro environment within broader society as patriarchy centralized itself as the norm and thus every other way of ordering society became the Other, and marginalized to the periphery. In terms of the racialization of images, binary oppositional thinking was most employed within this context as whiteness and white culture was framed as being opposed to nature (‘primitiveness’), therefore framed as being cultured and civilized, while Blackness and Black culture has always been portrayed as been an extension of, and coinciding with nature (‘primitiveness’, ‘barbaric behaviour’ and other racist, derogatory and reductive connotations) and framed interchangeably with visual imagery and language used to describe animals, thus dehumanizing Blackness, a feature inherent in all anti-black systems of oppression such as Slavery, Colonialism and neocolonialism such as Apartheid. The inherent differences among the human population, which are in and of themselves, not sites of Othering, but politics and ideologies racialize people and their bodies, their genders, sex identities, sexual orientation and so forth, imbuing meaning, both negative and positive (Franssinelli 2017:331-334).

?

The linkages and connections between visual discourse and the (re-)production of racialized, gendered and classist knowledge is in the coding and decoding of meaning within popular and sub-cultures. These meanings are not static, they are dynamic and contextual to the temporality and socio-cultural spaces they exist in and are such open to modification and change (Magaziner 2010). As a result of racialized capitalist systems of oppressions such as slavery, colonialism and neocolonial Apartheid, Blackness was imbued with reductive, stereotypical and essentialist connotative associations to justify the systematic disenfranchisement of a group of people such as, “innate laziness; fitted only for servitude; are of a primitive nature, genetically incapable of civilized refinement and lack of culture” through the naturalization as a representation strategy to fixate the idea of difference and essentializing it as characteristics are oversimplified without nuance (Magaziner 2010). This negates the common human features and characteristics, as they are more similarities than differences with people, contrary to the racialized regimes of representations in mass media. The regime exists because of the socio-economic policies and (in)action of various governments across the globe that has overseen “the expansion of black ghettos, the growth of the Black underclass socio-economic class group, with its endemic poverty that has led to ill-health and criminalization that has exacerbated the culture of guns, drugs and [state sponsored] intra-black violence in impoverished spaces as a result of historical injustices” (Hall 1997:105). Regimes of representation are cultural sites that are continuously contested and struggle over as a function of Gramsci’s concept of hegemonic power – who is dominant and who is being dominated (imperialism), contesting: the construction of self and ‘otherness’, and the inclusivity or lack thereof therein; the process of typing, stereotyping and power dynamics that inform it; the role of fantasy/mythology; as well as understanding the phenomenon of fetishism.

?

The denotative and connotative meanings of these various sites are ambiguous, pluralistic, dynamic, fleeting, and sometimes binary oppositional, as they shape-shift, depending on the society, its community and the temporal context that is being examined. These are often in conjunction with the visual imagery/culture that accompanies the texts and the lived experiences that inform these thematic meanings and the accumulation of meaning within the intertextuality of these cultural texts and their anthropological associations within the symbolic systems that creates myths, through mythology as Claude Levi-Strauss argues (cited in Hall 1997:88) that social formations and cultural groups project and impose their meanings of the world, how the world is organized and ordered, and their various systems of classification and grouping.

?

??????????? Binary oppositional meaning is key for classifying the world, as we understand things in binaries – civilized/primitive, good/bad, ugly/beauty, normal/exotic and so forth, in order to draw comparison and establish a clear difference between and among things in order to classify them. This can be towards either positive or negative meaning. Difference is central in cultural meaning. It is also the threat to unity and the co-existent of different cultures under the diversity and inclusion banner, and to undermine bigoted systematic means of exclusion and othering such as sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the intersection of these that marginalizes particular minority groups to the periphery of the social centre occupied those with privilege and with hegemonic power. As humans look from the self as the point of departure of what is the centre of how meaning is formed, from self, and then outward, projecting our notions, ideas, ideologies into the world around us. This outlook is informed by our psychic life which builds a sense of self by being diametrically opposed to the Other as it does not recognize it as part of self, but something alien/different (Mabin 1992:409).

?

Tenets of racial immaculateness in twentieth century South Africa finished during the early 1950s to late 1980s authorization of the Group Areas Act, 1950 and the Immorality Act, 1950 (Mabin 1992:409). These Acts meant to guarantee the immaculateness of the white social body through vicious segregationist mediations in organized topographies and the fabricated environment, at the equivalent time, attempting to authorize the immaculateness of the white physical/sexual body by condemning any sexual contact among so-called whites and so-called non-whites (Mabin 1992:405-420). Much of the apartheid discourse around isolation supported itself ethically and morally, by describing spaces of racial blending, like Sophiatown in Johannesburg and District Six in Cape Town, as sick, unhygienic slums (Marks and Bezzoli 2000:268). Starting around 1934, the Slums Act had accommodated the persuasive evacuation of occupants of 'censured' structures or neighbourhoods, regularly giving a rough and powerful method for separating cross breed, racially coordinated networks into isolated, controllable territories (Mabin 1992:405-420).

?

The peril which the half breed gathering of 'Nigerians' postures to the social body in District 9 has effectively been referenced, however generally, the issue of hybridisation is investigated through the instinctive assemblage of Wikus van de Merwe (Ellapen 2007:113-138). At the basic place of Wikus' transformation, a specialist, who is eliminating a mortar cast from his arm, uncovers a dark outsider paw where his hand ought to be (Ellapen 2007:113-138). The tension enrolled here, in Wikus' shock, is that pollution and hybridity do not really prompt the combination or the natural concurrence of character and contrast, but instead to the all-out subjection of self by other (Ellapen 2007:113-138). Wikus' most unimaginable dread when seeing his mixture arm is that his personality will be devoured totally by alienness/strangeness/Blackness. The festering and cracking of skin around the place of change between Wikus' body and the outsider paw appear to flag a nervousness about the likely distress also, brutality of social blending (Ellapen 2007:113-138). Tensions about interracial sex are ridiculed in the slanderous attack mounted by MNU against Wikus after he escapes from their illicit hereditary qualities lab: Wikus is imagined in the media in doctored photos showing him in a compromising situation with a Prawn, whose face is blue-penciled. The Immorality Act had been a foundation of the apartheid system's basic of racial immaculateness – a policing of boundaries in the room – zeroed in just on the virtue of the white quality pool, as no punishments were endorsed for sexual contact between different races (Van der Berghe 1960:77).

?

There is, nonetheless, an issue of force present in the film where hybridity is concerned. While Wikus can just enrol awfulness at his change from the onset, he before long understands that his crossbreed status permits him to utilize outsider weaponry races (Van der Berghe 1960:77). This condition makes him attractive both to the MNU (who need to collect his organs) and to the 'Nigerians' who, with regards to their rough mimicking, need to eat his changed arm to access the outsider weapons store. The utilization of the force acquired through the 'hybrid object' of Wikus' outsider arm is, eventually, liberatory, helping one to remember Bhabha's (1994:115) conceptual idea of hybridity, where the subverting of the frontier power is engraved in the exceptionally cross breed objects produced by the pioneer experience. Wikus, as he goes through change, additionally becomes subject to clashing longings and cravings: he aches for feline food (a delicacy to the outsiders) yet lets it out in baffled loathing subsequent to wolfing down a large portion of a tin. Food is, obviously, exceptionally emblematic in nature, as it crosses the lines of our bodies among outside and inside, turning out to be essential for us; this issue becomes pertinent again concerning misery (Du Toit 2009).

?

The restless activities of defilement and hybridisation, misery and uprooting, just as cutting off and evisceration, worked out with a combination of entertainment, ghastliness and savagery on the venue of Wikus' instinctive body, have been shown additionally to influence different sorts of bodies addressed in the film, making a liquid implying framework with the heterosexual, white, cisgendered male of Wikus van de Merwe at its centre (Du Toit 2009). Connotatively, utilizing the double procedures of illustration and metonymy, not just joins the bodies addressed in the film, yet talks about quelled recollections of the genuine brutality established on these bodies' noteworthy partners in the pilgrim and apartheid history of South Africa, just as in the present (Moses et al. 2010 155-175). Wikus is utilized as a sort of substitute, himself a generalization in a manikin theatre of coarse generalizations, with the uneasiness and responsibility around complicity of the white minority in a real sense irrupting from inside his body as an outsider presence (Moses et al. 2010 155-175). Eventually there is a feeling of a redemptive process being portrayed out; District 9 places a dream of the complicit white man's way to reclamation and the recuperation of a specific humankind as being vicious, intrusive, horrible, embarrassing, awkwardly warm, and not without humour. Nonetheless, the film lays on a propensity of forceful dissatisfaction – which discovers its article in Wikus' abused body – as the philosophical opportunities allowed by the account and visual procedures of incongruity and cartoon appear to shroud a trouble in wrestling with the genuine, lived intricacies of the battle for compromise in post-apartheid South Africa. Simultaneously, the actual liveliness of the film addresses a sort of gung-ho readiness to investigate troublesome and awful topic, and has considered numerous, shifted understandings, keeping away from the outright conclusion average of its more rigorously Hollywoodish partners in the science fiction blockbuster kind.

? by Sphesihle Gxotani Picture Box Films (Pty) Ltd

[5793 words]

?

References

?

BBC. (2009) Nigeria ‘offended’ by sci-fi film. https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8264180.stm [Accessed 14 August 2021].

?

Bhabha, H. (1994) The location of culture. London: Routledge.

?

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.

?

Black, E. (2016). “Third Cinema in Africa: A Cinematic Liberation of the Oppressed." The Culture Trip (Online) Available from: https://theculturetrip.com/africa/articles/third-cinema-in-africa-acinematic-liberation-of-the-oppressed/

?

Boehmer, E. (2005) Colonial and Postcolonial Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

?

Bradshaw, P. (2009) “District 9”. The Guardian? https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/sep/03/district-9-review? [Accessed 25 September 2021]

?

Child, B. (2021) “Will we ever get to see Neill Blomkamp’s mooted District 9 sequel based on ‘American history’?” The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/jul/23/will-we-ever-get-to-see-neill-blomkamps-mooted-district-9-sequel-based-on-american-history [Accessed 19 September 2021]

?

Diawara, M. (2007) “Self Representation in African Cinema.” Journal of Contemporary African Art, Fall 2007: 74-81. ?

?

District 9. (2009) [film] Directed by Neill Blomkamp. New Zealand, United States, South Africa: QED International, WingNut Films, TriStar Pictures.

?

Du Toit, A. (2009) “Becoming the alien: apartheid, racism and District 9.” Reflections on myth, politics, and desire

?

Ellapen, J.A. (2018). Geographies of the Black African masculine in Tsotsi and The Wooden Camera. Black Camera: An International Film Journal 9 (2):169–176.

?

Ellapen, J.A. (2007). The cinematic township: Cinematic representations of the 'township space' and who can claim the rights to representation in post-apartheid South African Cinema. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 19(1):113-138.

?

Frassinelli, P. P. (2017) ‘Intersecting temporalities, cultural (un)translatability and African film aesthetics: Ntshavheni wa Luruli’s Elelwani’, Journal of African Cultural Studies, 29(3), pp. 331–344. ?

?

Hall, D.E. (2004) Subjectivity. New York: Routledge.

?

Hall, S. (1997) Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. New York:Routledge.

?

IMDB. Neill Blomkamp’s “Filmography”. IMDB https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0088955/ [Accessed 22 September 2021]

?

Jansen Van Vuuren, A. and Verster, W. (2018), ‘From rural na?veté to urban discontent: Framing post-apartheid South African film identities’, Journal of African Cinemas, 10:(1+2) 111–29.

?

Film List. “Films: Neill Blomkamp.” https://film.list.co.uk/listings/neill-blomkamp/ [Accessed 04 September 2021].

?

Mabin, A. (1992) “Comprehensive segregation: the origins of the Group Areas Act and its planning apparatuses.” Journal of Southern African Studies 18(2): 405–429.

?

Magaziner, D. (2010) “Hollywoodland: District 9 and the ‘old’ South Africa” https://www.zeleza.com/symposium/953? [Accessed 9 October 2021].

?

Marks, R. and M. Bezzoli. (2000) The urbanism of District Six, Cape Town. In Africa’s urban past, ed. D. Anderson and R. Rathbone, 262–282. Oxford: James Currey.

?

Maingard, J. (2012). “Chimes of Freedom. Cinema against apartheid.” In Maingard,J. (2012). South African National Cinema: National cinemas. Hoboken; 4: Taylor and Francis.

?

Maingard, J. (2007). Screening Nation, in South African National Cinema, Oxon, UK: Routledge.

?

Mhondo, M. (2000). Approaches to African Cinema Study. Senses of Cinema, Issue 8. Available from: https://sensesofcinema.com/2000/film-criticism/african/ Murphy, D. Africans filming Africa: questioning theories of an authentic African Cinema. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 13(2):239-249.

?

Moses, M.V., L.V. Graham, J. Marx, G. Gaylard, R. Goodman and S. Helgesson. (2010) District 9: a roundtable. Safundi 11(1/2): 155–175.

?

Orgeret, K. S. (2009) ‘Films out of Africa’, Journal of African Media Studies, 1(3), pp. 505–509.

?

Ranker. (2018) “Famous Film Directors from South Africa” https://www.ranker.com/list/famous-film-directors-from-south-africa/reference [Accessed 24 October 2021].

?

Van der Berghe, P.L. (1960) Miscegenation in South Africa. Cahiers d’Etudes Africaines 1(4):68–84.

?

van Veuren, M. J. (2012) “Tooth and nail: anxious bodies in Neill Blomkamp's District 9”, Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 26:4, 570-586,

?

Vilkomerson, S. (15 August 2009) "District 9 Blew My Mind!". Observer. [Accessed 1 August 2021].https://web.archive.org/web/20090815143806/https://www.observer.com/2009/movies/district-9-blew-my-mind

?