The Assumptions behind Time per Stage (and why they’re often wrong)
Most B2B companies set expectations for how long deals should stay in each sales stage, but these assumptions are often based on flawed logic. Many organizations simply pick an arbitrary number—such as 30 days in proposal, 60 days in negotiation—without considering whether those benchmarks are actually predictive of success. Others rely on historical averages across all deals, which can be misleading and create inaccurate forecasts. A more intelligent approach is to use data from successful deals to establish realistic stage timelines.
Why Arbitrary Stage Timelines Fail
A Smarter Approach: Data-Driven Stage Timelines
Rather than relying on arbitrary numbers or broad averages, high-performing RevOps teams analyze stage velocity in won deals to set realistic expectations. This involves:
What This Means for Sales Execution
By shifting from guesswork to data-driven stage timing, sales teams can:
领英推荐
Coming Next:
Note: This post is the second in a five-part series of RevOps Fundamentals content.?
Part 3: Now that we’ve tackled defining stages, and flawed assumptions about stage timing, the next blog will explore how stuck deals impact forecasting and revenue growth—and what to do about them.
Stay tuned! Follow ayeQ