Assessing Recent Tank Survivability Against FPV Drone Threats

The dynamic nature of warfare has always been characterized by a continuous interplay between offensive innovations and defensive adaptations. In recent conflicts, notably the ongoing war in Ukraine, the emergence of first-person-view (FPV) drones has posed significant challenges to traditional armored warfare, particularly affecting the operational effectiveness of tanks. So much so that it has led some to proclaim the death of the tank. Will this be the case, or is this an example of Challenge-Response Theory (Sen, n.d.)? If so, will we see a shift toward defensive dominance and the potential implications for future military strategies?

The Ascendancy of FPV Drones in Modern Combat

FPV drones have become integral to contemporary warfare due to their cost-effectiveness, agility, and precision. In Ukraine, both Russian and Ukrainian forces have extensively deployed these drones for reconnaissance and direct attacks. Ukrainian forces, for instance, have effectively utilized FPV drones to target Russian armored vehicles, achieving considerable success. Reports suggest that a significant proportion of Russian tanks destroyed by Ukraine in recent months have been neutralized using FPV drones (Axe, 2025).

Defensive Countermeasures: The Introduction of 'Cope Cages'

In response to the escalating threat from FPV drones, military forces have implemented various defensive measures to enhance the survivability of armored vehicles. One such adaptation is the installation of metal lattices, colloquially known as "cope cages," atop tanks and other armored vehicles. These structures are designed to provide additional protection against drone strikes by causing the premature detonation or malfunction of incoming munitions (Interesting Engineering, n.d.).

The effectiveness of cope cages has been a subject of debate. While some instances indicate that these modifications can mitigate damage from drone attacks, their overall efficacy remains uncertain. Moreover, the addition of such structures can compromise the inherent design advantages of tanks, such as their low profile and mobility, potentially making them more conspicuous targets (Axe, 2025).

Recent Developments: Enhanced Tank Survivability

Despite the formidable threat posed by FPV drones, recent reports indicate that certain tanks have demonstrated increased resilience against such attacks. For example, a Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 tank reportedly withstood multiple Russian drone strikes, eight to 12 (Axe, 2025), a testament to the effectiveness of its add-on armor. Similarly, there have been accounts of Challenger 2 tanks surviving FPV drone attacks, though details regarding the extent of damage and operational status vary.

Implications: A Shift Toward Defensive Dominance?

These developments suggest a potential shift toward defensive dominance in armored warfare. As tanks become more resistant to FPV drone strikes through enhanced armor and defensive adaptations, their role on the battlefield may be revitalized. This increased survivability could enable armored units to conduct more aggressive operations, such as rapid assaults to seize and secure strategic positions, thereby altering current tactical paradigms. If defensive capabilities increase sufficiently for one side or the other to exploit that advantage, will they take the risk or let the defensive dominance switch back to offensive advantage?

Consequences for Future Military Strategy

The interplay between FPV drone threats and corresponding defensive measures underscores the dynamic nature of modern warfare. Military strategists must continuously assess and adapt to these evolving technologies. The potential resurgence of armored offensives, facilitated by improved defensive capabilities, may lead to a reevaluation of current doctrines, emphasizing the need for integrated approaches that combine traditional armored warfare with advanced technological countermeasures.

In conclusion, while FPV drones have introduced significant challenges to armored warfare, recent trends in tank survivability indicate a possible shift toward defensive dominance. This evolution carries profound implications for future military strategies, necessitating a balanced consideration of both offensive innovations and defensive adaptations in the ever-changing landscape of conflict.

Videos

Russian FPV drones targeting British-made Challenger 2 tanks in the Kursk region: https://x.com/clashreport/status/1867820241109319950?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1867820241109319950%7Ctwgr%5E7024658714e4c3f0c327e20bfa5b179ff1e91bb1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbulgarianmilitary.com%2F2024%2F12%2F14%2Fvideo-shows-where-russian-fpv-drones-aim-on-the-challenger-2%2F

Ukrainian Challenger 2 Getting Hit by a FPV Drone, in Kursk

https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/1gqg0qo/a_ukrainian_challenger_2_getting_hit_by_a_fpv/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

References

Axe, D. (2025, January 24). A Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 tank shrugged off eight Russian drones, proving its add-on armor works. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2025/01/24/a-ukrainian-leopard-1a5-tank-shrugged-off-eight-russian-drones-proving-its-add-on-armor-works/

Interesting Engineering. (n.d.). Ukraine’s Leopard tanks get 947-pound steel armor against FPV kamikaze drones. Interesting Engineering. https://interestingengineering.com/military/ukraine-leopard-tank-protective-screen-grill

Sen, R. (n.d.). Mathematical representation of the challenge-response cycle. LinkedIn. https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/mathematical-representation-challenge-response-cycle-robi-sen-urg6c/?trackingId=lZVZzkPnPtpybh8Dn4fkxQ%3D%3D

Ukraine Weapons Tracker. (2025, January 20). Ukrainian Leopard 1A5 survives multiple FPV drone attacks [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8M6tvgO5QU

?