Arvind Kejriwal's Arrest Sparks AAP's Call to Protest: Safeguarding the Right to Protest in India's Democracy

Amidst the commotion of political disruption, the call for protest reverberates through the streets of the national capital. The recent arrest of Delhi Chief Minister ArvindKejriwal by the Enforcement Directorate has ignited a fervent response from the AamAadmi Party (AAP) legal cell, prompting a call to action in all district courts of Delhi. As citizens gather to exercise their fundamental right to protest, questions arise: How can one safeguard this cherished right in India's democratic framework? This article seeks to unravel the intricacies of protest dynamics in India, shedding light on the fundamental principles, legal nuances, and strategies for a successful protest. Join us on a journey to understand the essence of protest and its significance in shaping the democratic fabric of our nation.

What is the meaning of protest?

Protest refers to the act of expressing strong disapproval or objection, typically in a public or organized manner, against a particular action, policy, decision, or situation. It often involves individuals or groups gathering together to voice their concerns, advocate for change, or raise awareness about an issue they perceive as unjust or undesirable. Protest can take various forms, including rallies, marches, demonstrations, strikes, sit-ins, petitions, and boycotts, and it serves as a fundamental tool for citizens to exercise their right to freedom of expression and assembly in democratic societies.

Perspective of protest as per Indian laws

The term "protest" is not explicitly defined in Indian laws as a standalone concept. However, the right to protest is derived from various provisions enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly under Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. Additionally, Article 19(1)(b) guarantees the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. These constitutional provisions provide the legal basis for individuals to engage in peaceful protests as a means of expressing dissent or advocating for their rights.

While the term "protest" may not be defined explicitly in Indian laws, the legality and parameters of protests are often interpreted by courts based on constitutional provisions and established legal principles. Courts have upheld the right to protest as an essential component of democracy, subject to certain reasonable restrictions such as public order, morality, and the sovereignty and integrity of India.

Moreover, specific laws and regulations may govern the conduct of protests in certain contexts, such as public order regulations, laws related to assembly and procession, and rules regarding permissions or permits for organizing protests in public spaces. However, these laws typically regulate the manner in which protests are conducted rather than defining the concept of protest itself.

What is not a protest

In India, a peaceful protest can become illegal when it violates certain restrictions imposed by authorities or infringes upon the rights of others. Acts that can render a peaceful protest illegal include:

1. Violating Public Order: If the protest disrupts public order or leads to violence, vandalism, or threats to public safety, it may be deemed illegal under provisions aimed at maintaining public peace and tranquillity.

2. Unlawful Assembly: When a protest exceeds the scope of its intended purpose or devolves into an unlawful assembly, where participants engage in riotous behavior, damage property, or threaten public safety, it can be considered illegal under laws regulating assemblies and processions.

3.Trespassing or Damage to Property: If protesters trespass onto private property without permission or engage in acts of vandalism, arson, or destruction of property, they may be subject to legal action for committing offenses such as trespass or mischief under the Indian Penal Code.

4. Incitement to Violence: Speech or conduct during a protest that directly incites violence or promotes hatred, enmity, or disharmony among different groups may lead to legal repercussions under laws pertaining to hate speech, sedition, or promoting enmity between groups.

5. Non-compliance with Legal Requirements: Failure to obtain necessary permits or permissions for organizing a protest in public spaces, as required by local laws or regulations, can render the protest illegal and subject organizers to legal penalties.

Consequences of illegal protesting

Engaging in an illegal protest in India can result in severe legal consequences. Law enforcement authorities may arrest individuals participating in such protests, particularly if violence or vandalism occurs. Those arrested may face criminal charges under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, including rioting, unlawful assembly, and damage to public property. Subsequently, individuals may undergo legal proceedings, including trials, where evidence is presented, witnesses are cross-examined, and arguments are made before the court. If found guilty,penalties such as fines or other punitive measures may be imposed. Additionally, individuals involved in illegal protests may be held civilly liable for damages caused to public or private property, potentially requiring them to compensate victims. Therefore, it is imperative for individuals to exercise their right to protest peacefully and lawfully, respecting legal boundaries and adhering to relevant regulations to avoid these serious legal repercussions.

When Peaceful Protests Turned Ugly: Prominent Examples

Some notable example in India where a peaceful protest escalated into violence occurred during the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in December 2019. The protests, initially peaceful, turned violent in several areas, including Delhi's JamiaMillia Islamia University and Uttar Pradesh's Aligarh Muslim University. Protesters clashed with police forces, leading to incidents of stone-pelting, arson, and vandalism. Several individuals were arrested and faced criminal charges for their involvement in the violence, including charges related to rioting, unlawful assembly, and damage to public property.

Another example is the Jatt reservation agitation in Haryana in 2016, where protesters demanding reservation status for the Jatt community resorted to violence, blocking highways, damaging public property, and clashing with law enforcement agencies. The situation escalated into widespread violence and rioting, resulting in loss of life and extensive damage to property. Many individuals involved in the violence were subsequently arrested and charged with various criminal offenses.

These instances demonstrate how peaceful protests in India can spiral into violence, leading to criminal charges against individuals involved in the unrest. While the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental democratic right, it is essential to adhere to legal and ethical boundaries to prevent such protests from descending into chaos and violence.

How to make protest successful.

In India, the right to peaceful protest is a fundamental right enshrined under the Constitution. However, this right is not absolute and is subject to certain reasonable restrictions. To ensure that a protest is successful within the boundaries of the law, certain requirements must be met:

1. Constitutional Basis:

- Article 19(1)(a): Guarantees the freedom of speech and expression.

- Article 19(1)(b): Allows citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms.

2. Legal Limitations and Requirements:

- Article 19(2): Permits the imposition of reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence.

- Article 19(3): Similar restrictions apply to the right to assemble peaceably and without arms.

3. Notice to the Authorities:

- Protesters are required to give notice to the local police or relevant authorities before holding a public assembly. The notice must typically specify details such as the protest's objective, its location, duration, organizers, and expected number of participants.

4. Compliance with Restrictions:

- Authorities may impose certain conditions to ensure that the protest does not disrupt public order, traffic, and the rights of others. Protesters must comply with such conditions, which might include designated areas for protest, prohibitions on blocking roads, and adherence to noise regulations.

5. Non-Violence:

- The assembly must remain peaceful. Any act of violence can lead to legal actions against the protesters and can lead to the dispersal of the assembly.

6. Avoiding Incitement:

- Protesters must refrain from statements or actions that could be construed as incitement to crime, public disorder, or violence.

7. Prohibition Orders:

- Under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), the authorities can issue orders to prevent assemblies that might pose a significant threat to public order. Protesters must not violate such orders.

8. Respect for Public and Private Property:

- Any damage to public or private property may be subject to penal action under relevant laws.

9. Environmentally Sensitive Protests:

- Protests should avoid any activity that could harm the environment, respecting laws related to environmental protection.

10. Coordination with Authorities:

- Working with local authorities can help ensure that the protest doesn't unduly interfere with the activities of others and runs smoothly without legal complications.

The Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have repeatedly delivered judgments that interpret constitutionally guaranteed rights and define the boundaries within which peaceful protests can take place. A successful legal protest, therefore, is one that maintains the Constitution's assurance of peaceful assembly and expression, while also adhering to the legal limitations imposed in the interest of public order and security. It is highly recommended for protesters to seek legal counsel to ensure full compliance with all pertinent laws and regulations while exercising their right to protest.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the recent call for nationwide protests by the Aam Aadmi Party following the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal underscores the legalities surrounding the right to protest in India. While protests play a crucial role in voicing dissent and driving change, it is essential to conduct them within the confines of the law to avoid legal ramifications. The Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have consistently provided interpretations of constitutionally guaranteed rights, emphasizing the importance of peaceful assembly while adhering to legal boundaries. Seeking legal counsel ensures compliance with relevant laws, fostering effective and lawful protests that contribute to a robust democratic society.

?