Artificial Intelligence’s nemesis: big legacy
Gianni Giacomelli
Researcher | Consulting Advisor | Keynote | Chief Innovation / Learning Officer. AI to Transform People's Work and Products/Services through Skills, Knowledge, Collaboration Systems. AI Augmented Collective Intelligence.
“God created the world in seven days, because he didn’t have to port anything from legacy systems” – this is an apt quote I recently heard from the CEO of a leading software company.
The same sentiment was echoed in a recent MIT Technology Review article, “Seven Deadly sins of AI Predictions,” written by Rodney Brooks, MIT’s former director of computer science and artificial intelligence laboratory. In the article, Brooks notes that the seventh major sin of AI is the speed of deployment is heavily influenced by the underlying refresh rate of technology.
A four-year lag
Unfortunately, businesses tend to trail behind in the adoption of new technologies – especially in comparison to the consumer space. My team has researched this over the years and found that it is hard to accurately predict when new technology will be productively embedded, at scale, in enterprise operations. And, a four-year lag is common between the initial prediction and actual large-scale adoption. The path between the two is often erratic. This is especially true for business-to-business (B2B) technologies that transform operations with deeply entrenched ways of doing things (not just systems).
The big problem
But more often than not, the big obstacle to overcome is legacy systems, namely processes and ways of working that are embedded in an organization’s culture and people. Think of why bank branches are so hard to reform despite many trying. Or, why healthcare providers are so slow to generate enough of the right data to feed algorithms that could train their machines.
The implication isn’t that enterprises should wait until technology fully proves itself, as the best competitors are increasingly harnessing these technologies to secure early advantages. However, what is needed is a deeper understanding of what hinders the embedding of technology into the fabric of enterprise business processes.
What should you do?
- Identify a range of potential projects that vary not only in technological complexity but also in organizational readiness. Choose a balanced portfolio that doesn’t rely only on superior organizational transformation.
- Use human-centered design methods, like design thinking, that enable the thorough understanding of the sources of value in order to deliberately narrow the scope of intervention.
- Explore options to rejuvenate old applications through “systems of engagement” that surround the pre-existing technology assets and complement them with a thin layer of cloud-based applications.
- Pinpoint the datasets that require extraction from legacy databases – through a process that doesn’t only consist of identification of data sources. Instead, the best approach is called “persona-based analytics.”
- And, ensure that your initiatives are led by a team with a mix of digital experts, human-centered design thinkers, lean practitioners, and business domain experts.
Much of Silicon Valley – especially the startup scene – doesn’t appreciate the lag in innovation. That’s why methods like Lean Digital are particularly useful in addressing the legacy challenge by addressing the systems issues more nimbly, as well as acknowledging the importance of end to end process analysis, and human centered design. And, yes, they can be applied in Silicon Valley too.
[this article was originally published on Genpact Insights together with many others on the same topic]
Business Improvement Specialist
6 年Good strategy and very well presented. Many projects are not only delayed but the costs grow with time. I would stress the customer centric area, too many systems fail to fully understand the value in the legacy design and customer use. Probably the source of most complaints when new systems are introduced.
Salesforce Strategic Solution Engineer
6 年Companies need to prioritize getting their data clean under a uniform data governance model. Start with the basics and get it done 100% starting with the data that'll add the most business value. Then using data becomes possible and relatively easy with today’s tools. I've spent a career dealing with this and it's a process that takes dedicated attention (a constant push) and enough resources to get it done quickly. Porting from a system that is managed under that uniform data governance model isn’t rocket surgery. Unfortunately, companies too often skip this step or short change these projects and suffer from it.
Associate Partner @ EY | Fellow SAP
6 年Good thoughts ell articulated but no organisation has the courage to tread the strategic view All decisions made today look foolish tomorrow from my own POV . What’s interesting is that organizations forget the core and start lip sticking the pig very soon in the game
Cultural Auditor | Business Analyst | Writer | Coder | Gifted Advocate | Blockchain Evangelist
6 年So true - changing the technology is the easiest part. Software is logical and predictable and discrete. People are none of those things! Add processes that were built around those legacy systems, and you have the reason for low adoption or even failure of your shiny new idea. Buying tech will not solve anything - it's all in the implementation, but that part is much more challenging. That's why I love it!