Article #3 : the first three movers… national infrastructure : power, fuel and hydrogen, and industry
Edward Morley
Helping transport organisations to transform their capability to release value, improving performance. Bringing ingenuity and creativity as we solve their most complex and strategic asset management decisions together.
I’m on article #3 of my series on ‘Navigating a journey to Net Zero’, I’ve introduced a visual narrative and described that journey over the next 30 years. ?This article looks at the overarching contributing factors to decarbonisation, and then in more detail at the first three of those seven themes.
The UK government has written a Net Zero Strategy published in October 21, that sets out how it expects to reduce carbon emissions across multiple sectors in the UK economy.
The government’s strategy touches on seven themes that must each play their role in decarbonisation to better than net zero.
Functionally we must either do and have less, or we must find alternatives for the things that we have, need and want but that cannot continue as they did.?
We must use less power and fuel to heat our homes, and / or find better ways not to waste heat and / or find better ways to repurpose and reuse that heat loss.
We must either travel less and / or we must find cleaner ways to do that.
By different measures, we are advancing forward in some areas, and lagging behind in others.?We do not have the breadth of renewable resources of many Scandinavian countries, nor the historical choice to create such a heavy base power supply through nuclear as some other European countries.
We are not leading the growth by market share of zero-tailpipe vehicles, nor do we have a fully integrated public transport alternative.
Yet we are accelerating off-shore wind production, and have the innovation capability to harness other power sources off the shores and tidal approaches to our islands.
We must also look more widely at the the opportunities to change how we live and use our land resources to reforest or change the things we eat.
So, look in more detail at the first three themes of power, fuel and hydrogen and industry.
National networks powering the economy must decarbonise (first)
My first bundled descriptions of the challenges, potential choices and stated commitments for decarbonisation are grouped around power production, distribution of fuels and then the industrial sector, which uses much of the energy produced.
Indeed, as a share of the total carbon emissions, the three themes discussed here have already been decarbonising significantly since the 1990s.
But around the world there are some very different choices to the sources of power (to electricity and heating) around the world. I posted on this recently - global production may be suggested to be reaching a tipping point, but in the superpowers of China, India and across Africa the sources used are still heavily fossil fuelled. Even in Europe there is the divergence of choice, the highly public closure of German nuclear will increase a gas and coal dependency, whilst France have a massive nuclear baseline production (>70%) and little fossil fuels. The Nordics are nearly entirely renewable, and the UK has all but removed coal, but still relies significantly on gas).
The Net Zero strategies for power, fuel and hydrogen and industry are heavy on the alternative productions (and / but whilst I'll come to it in a later article), far lighter on the reduction of need, the re-purposing of the created energy into multiple users in the value chain.
And I want to see far more made of the simple (and old tech) solutions that have significant possibility such as gravity energy storage in mine shafts and pumped hydro in the highlands .?
The challenge of future fuels may be less about the production of the fuels such as hydrogen, but more to do with how we more the fuel / energy to those that need it - and the billions of pounds such infrastructure will require. Equally, challenges (physically and morally) exist around the demand for (and the lack of forecast supply of) the rare metals necessary for many of the fuel cells and tech related control of vehicles and wider storage needs of the future.
Power generation on its own isn't the challenge... Doing it more sustainably is within reach - but choices must still be made as to the route desired... where power supply is unpredictable balancing storage is needed - and less commitments have been made in these spaces.
Secondly, the greatest value in power reduction remains the solutions that mean that we don't need to create it in the first place - and again more needs to be done of the circular economy of energy and the products (such as heating) that the power is used for...
Power
?“cheap clean electricity, made in Britain”
?
Challenges:
Choices:
?
Key policies:
Fuel Supply and Hydrogen
?“significantly reducing traditional oil and gas fuel supplies, whilst scaling-up low carbon alternatives such as hydrogen and biofuels”
?
Challenges:
Choices:
Key policies:
Industry
“accelerating decarbonisation in ‘clusters’, which account for approximately half of the UK’s industrial emissions”
?
Challenges:
Choices:
Key policies:
April 2021 - Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy
April 2023 - CCUS Net Zero Investment Roadmap
It is clear that large scale infrastructure change, and building will be necessary, whether that is in retrofitting of existing industry, or the creation of new networks to handle the increases in production and distribution of non-fossil fuel energy.
Much has been done to reduce the carbon footprint of the early late 20th century, and yet, much more now needs to be done to accelerate the creation of multiple times more our current base creation to meet the energy needs to tomorrow.
?
A series of articles
In the series of articles that follow this one, I set out to present the visual narrative, and the contributions that are made over seven themes set out by the UK government’s Net Zero Strategy.
Video : navigating a journey to zero
Article #1 :?a description of the journey over time
Article #2 :?a description of the journey over time
Article?#3 : the first three movers… national infrastructure : power, fuel and hydrogen, and industry
Article?#5 : the final two… the world we live in : natural resources, waste and fluoride gases, and greenhouse gas removal
Article?#6 : a complex system of systems
Article?#7 : the mindset and capability for net zero readiness
Article?#8 : so what’s missing?
Management Consultant | Strategic Advisory | Utilities, Defence, Transport, Nuclear
1 年I think a really important element you touch on here Edward Morley is communities - how can we empower and provide benefits to areas with different makeups, whilst addressing the challenges posed. Dare I write the phrase "levelling up", but this is a fundamental opportunity that our move to net zero can provide - regional hubs and increased self sufficiency have to be at the centre of our policy moving forward.
Associate Partner at PA Consulting Group
1 年Surely the past 18 months has shown that the huge over reliance on imported gas is a huge issue. We must become more self sufficient as well being smarter and more intelligent about how we use our energy