The Art and Science of Management
Ian De Guzman, MIITP, CTech.
A.I. | Cybersecurity | Data-driven Effective Altruism
The subject of management and leadership becomes clearer when we explore the contrasts between Science vs. Art and Management vs. Leadership:
Science vs. Art
In management or leadership, science is about producing measurable outcomes, while art is about how people react emotionally to those outcomes.
Why do we have degrees like "Bachelor of Science" or "Bachelor of Arts" in management?
The distinction lies in the approach: treating management as a science focuses on creating results, achieving efficiency, and tracking impacts. In contrast, the art of management is about the emotions, satisfaction, and perceptions surrounding those results. You can run things efficiently, but if people feel unhappy or disconnected, the effort can feel wasted.
For example, Leonardo da Vinci working on the Mona Lisa:
领英推荐
Or take professional boxing:?
Management vs. Leadership
Management is often described as maintaining the status quo, while leadership is about driving progress and hitting key performance indicators (KPIs). While these roles overlap, they have distinct focuses:
In settings like the military or police, this distinction becomes clearer. Managers or leaders are seen as replaceable—if one is lost, another steps up. What sets them apart is their achievements during their service. A leader could be a bold risk-taker who gets things done but leaves their team strained, or a nurturing figure who’s loved by the team but lacks strong achievements from a higher perspective.
Managing is about finding a balance between these extremes. It’s a balancing act, walking the fine line between producing results (science) and maintaining positive relationships and morale (art).