ARR/FTE as *a* metric for India SaaS

ARR/FTE as *a* metric for India SaaS

A few days ago, I wrote about the need for Indian SaaS companies to get into the mindset of judicious hiring. SaaS startups saw the highest number of job cuts in 2023, which was widely reported.?

You sometimes hear of a metric called ARR/FTE as a metric to track and maintain efficiency in a SaaS business. And for good reason. When I put out that LinkedIn post, the responses I received were more interesting than I had expected. While many in the industry agreed that ARR/FTE is an important metric, what I didn’t see coming was the strong opinion that it plays out differently for Indian SaaS companies versus their US counterparts.?

As Indian SaaS firms increasingly build cross border businesses, there is increased understanding of how to crack new foreign markets for Indian founders. It is only fair then that we look at the things that make India-born SaaS businesses unique and different. The assumption for India-born, cross border hgSaaS businesses has always been that they have a clear cost advantage because of the relatively cheaper workforce here. But if you look at their ARR/FTE, the chinks in that understanding begin to show.

Before we delve in further, let me break this metric down for you:

ARR is the annual recurring revenue of your business (either the more recent quarter’s subscription revenue times four or most recent month times twelve). FTE is the full time equivalent employees working for your company.? The ratio of the two gives you an idea of the revenue per employee.?

CJ Gustafson’s newsletter does a great job of explaining why ARR/FTE is an important metric for SaaS companies to track.?

In my original post, I had referred to data from a Meritech report:

bh

Source: Meritech?

If you zoom in on their original data, the top five companies with high ARR/FTE are incredibly efficient: Expensify ($1.26 million), Dropbox ($768,000), Adobe ($652,000), Shopify ($598,000), and Palantir ($571,000).?

But Tarun Kumar Mallapa, HackerEarth’s vice president for finance and strategy, had an interesting take. ARR/FTE is not an absolute metric. It varies depending on the stage your company is at. It takes businesses time to reach the level of efficiency that the Meritech data represents. This graphic is useful:

Source: OpenView Advisors

Across the hundreds of SaaS startups we’ve met from India, I find that many are significantly lower on this metric than their US counterparts. There are some reasons for this:

  1. There are too many entry-level folks in all functions in Indian SaaS startups. Reasons range from “they’re cheaper” to “they have passion”.??
  2. Your SaaS product is not doing the job on its own. That leads to customers being unable to manage without help, which means hiring more support staff.
  3. Holding on to professional services till very late could mean that founders are not invoking alliances/partnerships early enough.
  4. The DNA of over-hiring, once it sets in, is hard to break.
  5. Some startups selling into the Asia market have lower prices than the equivalent product on selling into the US market.

But it is also true that most of this reference data looks at US-based SaaS firms. A lot of friends and industry folks pointed out that Indian SaaS folks can’t draw an apples-to-apples comparison based on this because of operational differences between India and the US. I have compiled some of the most useful feedback that came in below:

Scale successful cost saving experiments

Kanav Hasija from Innovaccer had some interesting inputs on how the healthcare data platform increased its ARR/FTE ratio while operating teams from India and the US. The company went from $40,000 to $100,000 ARR. His recommendations for founders:

  • Graduate and institutionalise successful experiments. For instance, running an improvement programme — such as inbound sales, cloud cost, self serve, customer experience — successfully as a smaller scale pilot, but not institutionalising it at scale.?
  • Don’t make fresher/entry level too bulky.
  • Move towards self-serve motion.
  • Make your R&D efficient.?

Lessons from Indian IT services

Someone pointed out that the Indian IT services industry is an example of how cheap hiring does not necessarily mean better or higher revenue per employee. There hasn’t been significant efficiency improvement in this metric over the past few years.?

I looked it up. Indeed, the highest revenue per employee among the top five IT firms is $56K.? The average revenue per employee was $48K. Interestingly, many Indian SaaS companies have numbers that are south of this, even at a higher scale.

Apples to oranges?

An interesting example Tarun gave to illustrate the differences between US and India-based SaaS companies was the sales model. Indian SaaS companies tend to commonly deploy an inside sales model as their GTM strategy. That means the ARR/FTE ratio is better for Indian SaaS firms at lower ARR.?

  • The salary of a sales development representative in India is 1/8th of the typical SDR pay in the US.?
  • Up to $10 million ARR, this is a key growth engine for SaaS companies.?
  • This means a significant cost advantage for Indian Saas companies.
  • At higher ARR levels, the meetings/conversions in India are not as high as in the US, and hence efficiency begins to decrease.

To sum it up, the ARR/FTE is one of the many metrics to track the health of a SaaS company, especially ones from India that think they have a cost advantage. However, ARR/FTE targets should be different at different revenue levels. The graphic from OpenView is a good guide. Too low a number at a given revenue level could mean a company is bloated. And the bloat tends to be in support, delivery and customer service.?

Where do you see your business? Has tracking ARR/FTE helped you in your journey significantly? I’d love to hear more.

Swetabh Pathak

Co-founder & CTO at Elucidata | AI in Biomedical R&D

1 年

Very useful read Dev!

Vineeth Vijayan

Payments | Embedded Finance | SaaS GTM

1 年

One look at indiehackers and 1000s of micro saas that folks build everyday under the radar, these numbers are all in place. Also, one of those 'obvious' ratios most founders outside the tech world know of and track subconsciously. Along with gross/net margins. Last half a decade was an anomaly given low-interest rates and I suspect the numbers are also off given lot of average/bad saas startups out there. This should self-correct in 2 years at macro level

回复

Interesting take, and reminder on how to correctly interpret key metrics and hire judiciously.

回复
Muralidharan Chandrasekaran

New Venture, Portfolio Management and Growth Programs

1 年

Dev Khare, ARR / FTE is going to be clearly a metric to be modelled with "India weightage" along with stage of company.... glad you got the community thinking about this. There are couple of other metrics which could guide SaaS founders : 1) Contribution Margin / FTE (Indian saas setup will be even more worse due to large P.S and Support team, at times to cover up product gap as much as to provide white gloved service ) 2) EBITDA / FTE. Each of these helps to tune particular team for better efficiency. Real issue is, several India growth stage startup take scaling teams for granted without proper management (mid-level management, process and systems), as scaling teams esp bottom of the pyramid creates massive inefficiency not just on cost side but guzzles critical management bandwidth which otherwise is better spent on growth. Overall impacting productivity often times leaving the Founder CEO wondering "why are we not scaling fast while we doubled our FTE and expense base".

Ajay Kumar

Co-Founder & CEO, MonkSpaces.Ai

1 年

How about we evaluate (ARR)/(Total Payroll Expenditure)? It would help normalize for a lot of factors

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dev Khare的更多文章

  • Why Lightspeed backed Qure in healthcare+AI

    Why Lightspeed backed Qure in healthcare+AI

    Here at Lightspeed, we are super excited to partner with Prashant Warier and his team at Qure.ai in this growth round…

    18 条评论
  • Why Lightspeed backed Physics Wallah

    Why Lightspeed backed Physics Wallah

    Shreyam and I met Alakh and Prateek of Physics Wallah at their NOIDA office in 2023. Their down-to-earth nature and…

    10 条评论
  • Triomics: Using GenAI for clinical trials automation

    Triomics: Using GenAI for clinical trials automation

    Developing new drugs for life-saving cancer treatments is a complex and expensive process. As part of this development…

    6 条评论
  • Scrut Automation: Bringing GRC automation to the mid-market

    Scrut Automation: Bringing GRC automation to the mid-market

    I was first introduced to Aayush over Zoom on the drive from Koramangala to Bengaluru airport. We were nearing the end…

    4 条评论
  • The do's and don’ts of cross-border GTM

    The do's and don’ts of cross-border GTM

    Top 10 learnings for founders from Lightspeed India’s GTM Social in Menlo Park Founders are on the move. Especially…

    11 条评论
  • Our investment in Portkey.ai

    Our investment in Portkey.ai

    Today we are excited and proud to announce our seed investment in Portkey.ai and our partnership with Rohit and Ayush!…

    11 条评论
  • Why we invested in Zluri

    Why we invested in Zluri

    At Lightspeed, we are proud to lead the Series B in Zluri and look forward to many years of partnership with Ritish…

    3 条评论
  • This time, it’s different

    This time, it’s different

    Looking back at history, we can see the monumental shifts that have shaped the tech landscape globally. Netscape…

    24 条评论
  • Fast moving targets for AI fighter jets

    Fast moving targets for AI fighter jets

    Full-stack or mid-stack solutions using generative AI are being launched every week. I alluded to this earlier this…

  • Fighter jets >>> copilots

    Fighter jets >>> copilots

    Not a day goes by without copilots being announced by incumbent software companies e.g.

    2 条评论