Arguments Against Criminalizing Ransomware Payments
Matthew Rosenquist
CISO at Mercury Risk. - Formerly Intel Corp, Cybersecurity Strategist, Board Advisor, Keynote Speaker, 190k followers
The goal is to effectively end ransomware as a significant cybersecurity risk for everyone.?In exploring the different strategic options, one path has emerged superior, in which the flow of money to the ransomware attackers is essentially stopped.?The only way to make that happen consistently is to compel the victims to not pay by making it a criminal act.?However, not everyone agrees.?
In my discussions with many experts across a range of disciplines, the same arguments would emerge and be debated.?This is an exhaustive list of those arguments and the discussions that continue to support the premise that criminalizing ransomware payments is the best option.
In this video I discuss and address the most common arguments against criminalizing ransomware payments, in the hope we can come to a consensus for what may be the best path forward to end ransomware.
Argument Jump Points:
We must act.?Ransomware will not go away on its own and the cybersecurity products and services have been unable to curb the massive growth of this problem.?
We must select the best strategic solution, that meets the clear success criteria, and move to implement as quickly as possible to reverse the growing impacts of ransomware.
Ransomware Explained Series: