Architectural Redlines – Intern 101
What the Hell Are Redlines?
Redlines are architectural drawings that have been printed, reviewed, and marked up with errors, changes, and revisions. The markups are typically done in red ink to make them easier to find, hence the name Redlines.
As a set of construction drawings moves from a schematic design into the creation of construction drawings that a builder will use, printing out the drawings at 50% (usually on 11 x 17 sheets of paper) and full size (24 x 36 sheets or larger) is necessary to ensure quality control.
When drawing in CAD, the line weights (thicknesses of the line), shading, patterns, and other elements are usually color coded. The thickness of a line shown on a computer is often very different than the reality of a printed line. There is also a level of translation between each printer. The gray shading on one printer will usually be very different than the gray shading on another printer. So frequently printing PDF files on paper to do quality control makes excellent sense.
I personally print out as much as I need to, and sometimes that’s a lot. By printing so much, it actually allows me to work faster and be much more thorough, ensuring that a potential error is not made. The cost of the paper is always much cheaper and significantly more sustainable than dealing with an error on a construction site.
Everyone has different preferences, but when I work on a set of construction drawings, I love to mark up my own work on printed-out sets. It’s nice to back away from the computer screen and see the work on paper as it starts to move closer to what the contractor will need to build it. Some people use various kinds of software and draw all over PDF files in red. No matter how you do it, you’re still arriving at a drawing with markups in red.
“Picking Up Redlines…”
…Is a term used when someone marks up a set of drawings with all the errors, changes, and revisions in red ink. Then they explain all the changes that need to be made on the drawings to another person (who typically has a lower pay rate, let’s be honest), and that person will go into the drafting software to make all the changes.
Picking up redlines is a fantastic way for an architectural intern to really tap into the knowledge, experience, and expertise of more senior level members in the firm. Honestly, being the drafter for other, more experienced architects was one of the most important parts of my education. A ton of learning takes place around design, how put a building together.
Creating Construction Drawings Is An Art.
Putting together a clear, concise, and thorough set of construction documents for a contractor to build from is a skill and an art form. Anyone who does this work has their own systems, theories, and philosophies about how to put together a set of drawings.
The real power of picking up redlines is doing this job with many different people and tapping into the collective knowledge of the office. Everyone at the office has different experience and a different area of expertise. A good attitude to have as an Intern is:Knowing there is valuable knowledge you can learn from every single person at the office and being open to learning something from everyone.
Dont Get Lost!
When picking up redlines its really easy to forget the changes that you have made as you move through the markups. Especially if you do not complete all the redlines in one sitting. The very best way to keep track of the work that has been done is to use a highlighter and mark off each redline mark that has been picked up or completed.
Redline your own drawings before you ask someone else to.
There are 2 important concepts you need to understand if you are spending many hours drafting:
- The drawings will never be perfect. You can work on a set of drawings for 143,567 hours, and there will always be more you can add.
- When you are working on a drawing and putting a lot of thought and energy into it, you can become very blind to a blatantly obvious error. You just don’t see it because you have been staring at the same drawing for too long.
When I first started working in offices, I used to work really hard on drawings, print them and then hand them right to my supervisor without reviewing them first. He would find the most obvious errors that I couldn’t see it on the screen but it was blatent once it was printed. For a long time, I used to feel really sheepish because my drawings had sloppy errors on them.
At some point, I got sick of this stupid concept being a distraction and making me repeatedly look like a fool.
So I started to get very obsessive about making it a habit to always check my own drawings before I handed them to my boss to review. By doing this, it showed that I took the time to review my own work and I felt better about catching that spelling mistake, before the boss did.
Every Boss will be appreciative of seeing your layer of redlines before they add theirs.
This post was written by Michael Riscica and is originally posted at: https://youngarchitect.com/2015/07/02/architecture-intern-101-architectural-redlines/
Senior Associate at Rothelowman
9 年Regardless of the method, instilling an ethic of self-checking before drawings (or any document) get reviewed along with an explanation of why certain things should be done certain ways is essential IMO for all young architects forging their careers.
Architect and construction contract administrator building on 30+ years experience to employ construction know-how, logistical prowess, and big systems perspectives to change the world for the better one day at a time.
9 年Haha. I want to yellow out all the red in the picture.
Housing, Climate, Transportation Change Advocate - collaborate with municipalities to create climate-resilient cities | MS in Urban Policy and Leadership
9 年I'm going to keep this short and say I hated red lining because I couldn't understand the Architects handwriting at times, but being around the Architect gave me a better understanding of how a building was actually put together. I play around with doing my own stuff at home and have had to check my own work many times over. It is a learning tool that can have its benefits and downfalls because of the Interns unnoticeable errors, but improves his or her post graduate knowledge in Architecture.
Construction Administration / Owner's Representative/PM/CA
9 年Mr. Pilus, about 99.9% of the time we are on the same page; however I have been doing construction documents for over 25 years (lots of projects), with 99.9% of that in cad. The problem of reviewing documents in this nature is seeing the "overall picture" as you can with paper. This especially holds true on big/large projects. With cad and viewers, you can zoom in, and look at many things, however when working on a large projects (seeing the big picture) it is imperative to be able to see everything; whole; as when it is printed. Line weights, line types, still have definitive meaning in construction documents; sometimes does not translate on screen. An dwg file is an electronic file, it is not a printed format such as PDF, thus line weights, types, etc. can still print out differently in comparison of what you "think" you see on screen. I have reviewed documents like this, but as a general rule find additional errors and notes that need to be added once printed. If you have a very high resolution monitor that it is 65", it maybe more doable. But PDF format would be more representative of the printed sheet. I know of no municipality that allows only electronic format submissions so printed sheets are still a major factor.
President at JMP Consultants
9 年We do drawing reviews for many firms, typically when the sets are nearly ready for a permit review by the AHJ. We print nothing, we use codes that identify our observations. Autodesk has multiple design review programs that are free downloads. The advantage we see is: multiple editors have access to the files and can make notes that everyone can read that are dated and verified. The process of scanning and distributing documents....or heaven forbid.... making paper copies and Fed Ex mailings to consultants is cumbersome, costly, and environmentally wasteful. Unfortunately Architecture is a form of business, not an art. CSI provides some standard approaches that include uniform systems of organization. Each firm should not have its "own approaches".