April 15, 2022 - ESG and Climate News
Will it be different this time?
With last week’s dire warnings from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report still reverberating, world leaders' made the predictable, if regrettable, choice to re-embrace fossil fuels in light of soaring fuel prices caused by the war in Ukraine .?
We have seen this before. Despite the lofty promises to address the looming climate crisis, tangible actions are shelved or reversed when more urgent matters take center stage.? To some extent, this is understandable.? Humans are notoriously bad at considering long-term consequences - especially if? there are pressing matters at hand - no matter the magnitude of those consequences.??
In the late 1960s, psychologist Walter Mischel and his colleagues at Stanford University conducted the marshmallow experiment with four- and five-year-old preschool children.? The researcher told the child that he was going to leave the room and that if the child did not eat the marshmallow while he was away, they would be rewarded with a second marshmallow. However, if the child ate the marshmallow they would not get a second marshmallow. Most picked the immediate reward.? (Interestingly, subsequent studies showed the kids who waited became more successful adults).??
The point is, we are terrible at thinking long-term.? Since we cannot predict what will happen in the future, we make choices that benefit us in the short term.???
But maybe, just maybe, that is changing when it comes to climate.? A group called Scientist Rebellion sent over 1200 scientists protesting in streets of 26 countries - with some being arrested.?
The scientists were joined by groups, such as the Extinction Rebellion who shut down Lloyds of London, the world’s largest insurance marketplace, in response to Lloyd's support of fossil fuel projects. Protesters also glued fliers and themselves to the Shell’s headquarters in London , and in Washington DC, they shut down the I-395 freeway.
One small step for man
Among those breaking the law is NASA scientist Peter Kalmus, who along with three other scientists, chained himself to the JP Morgan Chase building in Los Angeles to draw attention to the bank’s status as the largest financier of the fossil fuel industry. His point is that we are stuck in “a global bystander effect” and that more people should engage in climate disobedience.?
Climate activism is not radical
The climate activists claim nonviolent civil disobedience is their last resort as nothing else is working . The global demonstrations were fueled in part by last week’s strong rhetoric from UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres: “Climate activists are sometimes depicted as dangerous radicals. But the truly dangerous radicals are the countries that are increasing the production of fossil fuels."
Even the judges presiding over court proceedings for arrested activists have been swayed by the cause.? One judge praised the Insulate Britain Protests, saying “They have inspired me and personally I intend to do what I can to reduce my own impact on the planet, so to that extent, your voices are certainly heard.” ? The judge said the protesters had “no doubt” been acting in a way they believed was “morally right” but had still committed a criminal offense and handed down fines of £120 to £200.
领英推荐
Just Stop Oil
Can breaking the law be morally right? According to a member of the youth activist group Just Stop Oil : “there is a need to break the law, so we are not guilty of greater crime.” The group claims they will keep up their civil disobedience until they “all are jailed.”
In Elizabeth Cripps’ opinion piece in The Guardian, she argues that law-breaking, in this case, is morally defensible . When governments do not hold up their side of the bargain, we not only can, but possibly should break some laws peacefully and publicly on principle.
Just Stop Oil is not the only youth group taking action with an aim to protect their future. Another inspiring group is taking a different approach: sixteen young people are suing the state of Montana in a first of its kind climate case to make it to trial. Their complaint is the prioritization of fossil fuel interests over their future. A decision by the court in favor of the 16 plaintiffs could have sweeping implications across the country, setting limits on the subsidies and other protections enjoyed by oil and gas interests.?
A recent study showed why climate activism is so important to today's youth, with 8 out of 10 teenagers believing that climate change will significantly impact their lives , including where they live and whether to have kids.?
Net zero is the new bottom line
Highlighting the crucial role of the finance sector in funding the transition to a low carbon economy, the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi) published new guidance providing financial institutions with a foundation for setting and assessing net zero commitments. The guidance comes ahead of the new standard they are set to release in 2023 , to bring the clarity and scientific basis the sector needs to align with net-zero by 2050.?
Another climate milestone was achieved this week as the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) exceeded its goal of 250 signatories by the end of 2022 . This new accounting standard estimates the carbon impact of several categories of financial transactions.? It has been rapidly adopted by the finance industry in the last couple of years, growing by 350% in 30 months.
Notable news of the week:
Notable podcasts:
Notable events:
Principal, Director of Sustainability at CannonDesign; Architect, Speaker, Author & Thought-Leader in Deep Green Buildings
2 年Funny you mention the marshmallow experiment, as I've bene thinking about that a lot recently. It really does seem the time is getting tighter and yet the world still grabs that immediate marshmallow without thinking.
Harvard Lecturer Emeritus | Uncertainty Risk Management | Pollution Prevention | Process Improvement | ESG | Organizational Sustainability | Author
2 年Thank you, Tim (and helpers)! For the near future, readers of this summary should be thinking about responding to the "rulemaking information filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. ISSB is supposed to be providing assistance to SEC with regard to future disclosures. Not being invited to do so, the ISSB can provide information on the rulemaking questions. All the readers should take some time to respond to the ISSB consultation on preparing disclosures. All public companies will need to conform, probably on January 1, 2023. https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2022/03/issb-delivers-proposals-that-create-comprehensive-global-baseline-of-sustainability-disclosures/ Mandatory disclosures will be closely monitored by IOSCO and about 130 securities organizations around the world. IFRS is in the process of merging SASB into its portfolio of measurements and disclosures. ISSB has set out its plan for how its work will build on the SASB Standards and industry-based standard-setting processes. https://www.ifrs.org/content/ifrs/home/news-and-events/news/2022/03/issb-communicates-plans-to-build-on-sasbs-industry-based-standards.html #centerforcps