Are Apprenticeships Under Threat?
Tom Rogers
Early Careers Practitioner @ BAE Systems | Championing Apprenticeships | Building FindATrainingProvider
As usual skip to the end for your TL;DR synopsis.
Right, let's dive straight in...
Over the next 12 months, we could see a new government come to power. If the last few years are anything to go by, you get the sense that change is coming, and if the newspapers are to be believed, then even the Conservatives strategists are resigned to defeat.
Firstly, I want to make clear, this isn’t sponsored by either party, this isn’t sponsored. In fact, I hope it leads to conversation about how we can adapt the proposals to benefit the nation. (If anyone wants to sponsor me, I am thinking brands such as British Airways, Bentley, Virgin Holidays etc then message me)
This is actually a look forward at the proposed plans set out by the shadow skills minister and Keith Starmer on behalf of the Labour government.
The Growth & Skills Levy
That is the name that encompasses their proposed skills & apprenticeships plan
The key message is that levy-paying employers will be able to use up to 50% of their levy pot to fund other qualifications. These qualifications will be set out by a new governing body they will introduce called Skills England. The eligible qualifications haven’t yet been released.
The other 50% of their levy contributions are still reserved for apprenticeships and SME’s will still have access to the government contributions to apprenticeship funding
So that is the plan, does this mean apprenticeships are under threat?
What I can say is that I understand why Labour are proposing this initiative.
In the year 2022-23 it was estimated that over £400m of levy funds was left unspent by employers.
This means it is returned to the Treasury. These are funds dedicated to funding apprenticeships. Some reports are that 56% of levy funds are unspent, so you can see where the Labour party have done their calculations.
Everyone in the industry has been calling for reforms to the levy
Robert Halfon, former Skills Minister, stated that this would lead to a limit of 144,000 starts under the new levy which is just under half the starts for the previous 12 months.
Further concerns have been raised about it the governments ability to support the 95% contribution to SME apprenticeship funding. This has previously been funded using the unspent levy funds from large employers.
领英推荐
Halfon estimates the additional cost of Growth & Skills Levy to be £1.5billion
One of the areas most under threat would be HE universities, as the courses that would qualify for the 50% are said to be aimed more at employability and functional skills
After all the work Universities have put in to implement degree apprenticeship programmes, might we see these be the first to hold less value to employers.
In my experience, employers generally take the easiest route, especially when it comes to spending a pre-determined pot of money. Given the option to put their employees through short courses as opposed to training the next generation, there will only be one winner.
So that is where I see apprenticeships suffer under this scheme. A classic case of short term vs long term thinking will be the issue.
I think the Growth & Skills Levy is a great idea , but not in this format.
We should definitely look to allow organisations to spend their levy on courses other than apprenticeships. As this will only fuel the economy and produce a vastly more skilled workforce
However a flat 50% rule is far too big a number to cut into the apprenticeship levy. Neither system works for every business, so we need to look for a system where an individual business can be means tested for their needs. In industries with large employment gaps and ageing workforces, perhaps we should have a focus on apprenticeships, and in industries with a skills shortage we should be looking to the skills levy.
What do you think is the route forward?
TL;DR Labour plans to allow levy paying businesses to spend 50% of their levy on other skills courses yet to be determined. This could impact the value and funding behind apprenticeships.
Sources
Labour Strategy: Breaking Down the Barriers To Opportunity
Think UK: Labour Skills & Growth Levy
FE Week: Labours Levy Plan
FE Week: Skills Levy won’t devalue Apprenticeships, Malhotra claims
Account Director | MSc in Organisational Psychology | Former Founder & Early Careers Recruitment Specialist
11 个月Thanks Tom Rogers. I agree that a more nuanced approach might be warranted, one that takes into account the unique needs and circumstances of different industries and businesses.
Consultant for Apprenticeship ASK Programme
11 个月Apprenticeships will always survive, but in what format? I have seen so much change in funding , criteria etc in over 26 years. The Training Enterprise Councils , then Skills Funding Agency. The loss of ESF funding has had an impact on FE. The Degree Apprenticeship pathway is one of the best avenues now on offer, however demand will always outstrip supply in many sectors like law. SMEs in my experience must have financial support and encouraged to employ Apprentices. Where is this unspent Levy going? If it is unspent than it should be supporting all educational areas which are seriously underfunded. Skills & education are the bedrock foundation of our society. If as one commentator says that £400m is not underspent and is retained by the treasury than IMO it should go to educational needs.
Director of Policy and Deputy Chief Executive at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) - Skills Champion & Further Education Advocate #AskAshworth #SkillsMeansGrowth. Also found on X: @SimonAshworth
11 个月Hi Tom - a very popular topic of discussion, just some comments I would make in addition. The 50% flexibility that is being proposed by Labour is unlikely to be so straightforward that employers can spend 50% on apprenticeships and 50% on other programmes. It's more likely that levy payers will need to utilise 50% of their levy before they then might have the option to spend the remaining 50% of more apprentices or on what this new flexibility is. Detail is vague, but on the latter, the two things that get talked about time and time again are some form of pre-employment/pre-apprenticeship programme and a more modular approach to delivery, or some form of unitised element of skills top-up. The £400m is not underspent, it's non-allocated money that the Treasury retains from the levy take as opposed to giving to DfE to spend on apprenticeships. Over the last three years, 98% of DfE's apprenticeship programme has been fully utilised. Whatever your view on levy flexibility (or not) the fact is that if 98% of the apprenticeship programme budget is spent, giving employers more things to spend their levy on will mean fewer apprentices. Flexibility cannot be achieved without more money or apprenticeship numbers will decline not increase
Paul Firmin - any comments on this?