Applicability of the Rule of 40 Beyond SaaS: Insights for Technology Services Companies
For SaaS (Software as a Service) companies, one rule has gained considerable traction over the years for assessing the health and growth potential of these businesses: the Rule of 40. This simple yet powerful metric has become a gold standard for investors and companies alike, helping them balance growth and profitability in an industry where scaling quickly often takes precedence over financial returns.
However, as the technology landscape evolves, a critical question emerges: Is the Rule of 40 relevant only for SaaS companies, or can it also be applied effectively to technology services companies?
What is the Rule of 40?
The Rule of 40 is a financial metric used primarily to evaluate the performance of SaaS companies. It states that a company's combined revenue growth rate and EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) margin should be at least 40%. In other words, a nascent SaaS company growing exponentially at 50-60% per year might still be unprofitable in its early stages, which is acceptable under the Rule of 40. However, as the company scales and its growth rate naturally tapers to 20-30%, it should transition to profitability. The sum of its growth rate and EBITDA margin should then align with the Rule of 40, ensuring that the combined figure meets or exceeds 40%.
The origins of the Rule of 40 are somewhat nebulous, but it gained popularity among venture capitalists and investors as a quick heuristic for assessing whether a SaaS company is balancing growth with profitability. As SaaS businesses often prioritize rapid expansion over immediate profitability, the Rule of 40 offers a balanced perspective, ensuring that companies are not sacrificing long-term sustainability for short-term gains. Over time, this metric has become a key component in SaaS valuations, guiding investment decisions and strategic planning across the industry.
Extending the Rule of 40 to Technology Services Companies
While the Rule of 40 was developed with SaaS companies in mind, its principles can be applied to other segments of the technology sector, particularly technology services companies. These companies, which provide specialized IT services such as consulting, system integration, and managed services, share some similarities with SaaS businesses, particularly in their focus on recurring revenue and scalable solutions.
To explore the applicability of the Rule of 40 in technology services, we conducted an analysis of 30 publicly listed tech services companies, comparing their valuation multiples against their growth rates and EBITDA margins (Chart 1). The results were striking - we found an R-squared value of 0.76, indicating a strong correlation between the combined growth and profitability of these companies and their valuation multiples (EV/EBITDA). This suggests that much like in the SaaS industry, investors in technology services companies value a balance between growth and profitability. Interestingly, when we grouped these 30 companies into six categories based on their size, service offerings, and market focus, the R-squared value increased even further to 0.97.
Chart 1: EV/EBITDA vs. Revenue growth CAGR (2022-25P)+EBITDA Margin
?
What Our Analysis Reveals
Our analysis reveals several key insights. First, the strong correlation between growth, profitability, and valuation multiples underscores the importance of maintaining a balanced approach in the tech services sector. Companies that focus solely on growth without regard to profitability may find themselves struggling to achieve favorable valuations. Conversely, companies that prioritize profitability at the expense of growth may also see their valuations suffer.
The other interesting read is that the companies which are having very high valuation multiples i.e. >25x EV/EBITDA have established businesses and over 40% of revenue growth + EBITDA.
Implications for Technology Services Companies
For technology services companies, the applicability of the Rule of 40 offers valuable guidance for strategic decision-making. Companies in this sector often face similar challenges to those in the SaaS industry, including the need to scale quickly, manage costs, and deliver consistent value to clients. By adopting the Rule of 40, tech services companies can ensure that they are balancing growth and profitability, making them more attractive to investors and better positioned for long-term success.
Moreover, our analysis suggests that technology services companies should not only aim to meet the Rule of 40 but also consider the specific dynamics of their market segment. For example, companies in high-growth areas such as cloud computing or cybersecurity may need to prioritize growth slightly more, while those in more mature markets may benefit from a greater focus on profitability. By tailoring their strategies to their unique circumstances, tech services companies can optimize their valuations and drive sustainable growth.
Conclusion
The Rule of 40, though originally conceived for SaaS companies, proves to be a versatile and valuable metric for technology services companies as well. Our analysis of 30 tech services companies demonstrates a strong correlation between growth, profitability, and valuation multiples, reinforcing the relevance of this metric beyond the SaaS world.
As the technology landscape continues to evolve, companies in the tech services sector would do well to adopt the Rule of 40 as part of their financial toolkit. By doing so, they can strike the right balance between growth and profitability, positioning themselves for success in an increasingly competitive market.
Reference: