An Appellate Court Will Not Change a Plea Contract
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE
Insurance claims expert, consultant at Barry Zalma, Inc. and author/Publisher at ClaimSchool, Inc.
INVITED ERROR MAKES SENTENCE REMAIN UNCHANGED
Post 4865
Posted on September 3, 2024 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v5dh69g-an-appellate-court-will-not-change-a-plea-contract.html? and at https://youtu.be/a-fTBXKMO1Y
Travis Darrell Gentry pled guilty to insurance fraud by presenting to insurer or person false or altered statement material to insurance, Idaho Code § 41-293(1)(c). Pursuant to a plea agreement, in exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. In State Of Idaho v. Travis Darrell Gentry, No. 51304, Court of Appeals of Idaho (August 21, 2024) the issue was resolved.
As part of the plea agreement, both parties recommended a sentence of three years, with a minimum period of incarceration of one year, and three years of probation. The district court followed the recommendation and imposed a unified sentence of three years, with a minimum period of incarceration of one year, suspended the sentence, and placed Gentry on a term of probation for three years.
Mindful that he received the sentence that he requested, Gentry appealed contending that his sentence is excessive.
ANALYSIS
Although Gentry received the sentence he asked for, he asserts that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.
The doctrine of invited error applies to estop a party from asserting an error when his or her own conduct induces the commission of the error. One may not complain of errors one has consented to or acquiesced in. This doctrine applies to sentencing decisions as well as rulings made during trial.
Therefore, because Gentry received the sentence he requested, he may not complain that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
领英推荐
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance criminals are narcissists. They think they can convince anyone of anything. Mr. Gentry was wrong. He agreed to a sentence in exchange for the state dropping some of the charges, he had nothing to complain about but did so anyway. The court made him stand by his agreement even if it was more than was appropriate it was the deal he made and he was required to serve the time. It takes a great deal of gall to try to set aside an agreement made between Gentry, his lawyer, the prosecutor and the trial judge. He will serve the time.
(c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg
Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk