API Key Naming Standard?

API Key Naming Standard?

As cloud-native infrastructure and DevOps continues to dominate the modern information technology landscape, API keys have become the credentialing standard for authenticating and authorizing entities. While this approach enables incredible flexibility and agility, it has also created a major security challenge when API keys are not managed or secured properly. Hardcoding usernames/passwords in code has been an ever-present security challenge, but with cloud, the stakes of leaking API keys are much higher, since even a single key accidentally published to a public Github repository can give a bad actor control over an entire cloud account or massive sensitive data repository.

I was listening to a recent episode of the terrific Defensive Security Podcast, and the topic came up about how proficient bad actors are getting at mining code repositories for API keys. If bad actors can easily discover API keys, what is keeping us from finding them before they are leaked? Could it be a lack of naming standards? In my time as an IT professional, I've worked with many API keys from many vendors, and I have yet to find a naming/format standard that could help identify and scrub keys before they ever leave a dev environment or dynamically as they are published to repositories.

If such a standard already exists, I would welcome insights from anyone in the comments. But if it doesn't exist, wouldn't we be in a better position to defend API keys if every one were formatted with a consistent plain-text prefix like "apikey_a4db08b7-5729-4ba9-8c08-f2df493465a1? At the risk of oversimplifying the challenge, an API key format standard would help empower data loss prevention tools, DevOps pipelines and GitHub/GitLab repositories to be gatekeepers for these sensitive credentials.

It seems that AWS uses such a convention, but if this were an IETF standard adopted by all cloud service providers and developers, I think this could be a significant step in the right direction towards protecting these critical credentials which, when mismanaged, too often result in catastrophe.

Bill Nystrom

US Air Force Lead @ Elastic | Turning Data into Advantage

3 年

Great idea!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sam Richman的更多文章

  • The AI/ML Zero Trust Evolution

    The AI/ML Zero Trust Evolution

    I recently had the revelation that the evolution of AI/ML architectures that we are witnessing is a great example of…

    5 条评论
  • Bad Voltron Attacks — when the sum is worse than the parts

    Bad Voltron Attacks — when the sum is worse than the parts

    On Friday, March 29th, the information technology industry had a near miss. A lone developer, Andres Freund, to whom we…

    6 条评论
  • Muskets vs Machine Guns: Asymmetry in modern cyber-warfare

    Muskets vs Machine Guns: Asymmetry in modern cyber-warfare

    I recently read a book called Guns of the South, an alternate history fiction about fascist time travelers who provided…

    3 条评论
  • JADC2 Cannot Exist Without Zero Trust

    JADC2 Cannot Exist Without Zero Trust

    Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) is arguably the most ambitious, promising, and paradigm-shifting concept…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了