Angry Cars, Unsafe Cities

Angry Cars, Unsafe Cities

I recently came across an article on road safety in India that mentioned a comment by our Hon'ble Transport Minister, Mr. Nitin Gadkari, stating that the increasing number of road accidents and fatalities is a failure of the government. He also remarked that there is neither respect nor fear for road laws in our country. It’s rare for government officials to admit their shortcomings, but this statement reflected a sobering truth that I couldn’t help but agree with.

While it is commendable that the government acknowledges this issue, there are other contributing factors that raise questions about our driving habits and behaviour. Every drive now seems fraught with close calls, leaving law-abiding drivers questioning whether it’s even worth following the rules when large SUVs speed past them recklessly. We’ve all noticed the sudden surge of SUVs on showroom floors and city streets. But in cities that don’t face extreme terrains like tundras, deserts, or forests, do we really need these off-roaders as everyday vehicles? SUVs may help with the ever-increasing potholes, but the real solution should be fixing the roads, not opting for high-clearance vehicles.

That said, high-clearance cars do provide a practical solution to unresolved infrastructure issues, particularly for those who can’t wait for road improvements and need to commute daily. However, the aggressive exterior designs of these vehicles suggest an uncomfortable aspirational trend. The problem arises when these imposing designs become the most sought-after by the masses.

From a psychological perspective, designs with predatory aesthetics trigger instinctual fight-or-flight responses. On the road, this reflex can influence how drivers react in tense situations—should they slow down and let the car pass, maintain speed and let the other driver find their way, or speed up to feel momentarily superior? When driving, there’s little time for contemplation, only reaction. A larger car might straddle two lanes, with aftermarket headlights glaring at oncoming traffic. Our instincts tell us to prioritize safety, which is, of course, the responsible thing to do.

But does the aggressive design of these cars encourage aggressive driving behaviour? Consider the mindset of a "predator" on the road: lane-hogging becomes effortless, exerting dominance is second nature, excessive honking is excused, and blinding other drivers with high beams feels justified. The car, in this sense, empowers the driver to feel invincible—to drive fearlessly, fast, and however they please. The sense of freedom that a car offers - be it SUV, hatchback, sedan, or a crossover - is unparalleled. Even the thought of an accident doesn’t faze some drivers because the sheer size of their vehicle provides an illusion of safety. But when does this confidence cross the line into recklessness, becoming dependent on intimidating & overpowering others? Laws can only do so much to curb dangerous driving, especially in a country where road etiquette is often seen as optional.

As basic principles of traffic suggest, speeding doesn’t necessarily get you to your destination faster—the pace of traffic generally determines arrival time for everyone. But on narrow, potholed roads, filled with uncertainty at every turn, a massive, aggressive-looking car might offer drivers a false sense of security, compensating for the safety their environments are lacking.

SUVs also pose a significant danger to pedestrians and two-wheeler riders. A collision with one of these vehicles can lead to injuries to vital organs like the lungs and heart, while a smaller car would hit below the waistline. Car companies are rolling out stunning SUVs brimming with personality, features, and capabilities, but we must also consider how these designs are impacting driving behaviour. Today’s road conditions will shape the habits of tomorrow’s drivers, and as the automotive industry grows, design should address how to improve driving education and cultivate respect for road laws and etiquette.

Interestingly, we’re seeing a shift in consumer demand from aggressive designs to more rectilinear, 80s-inspired aesthetics. These vehicles appear more futuristic, confident, and purposeful. Whether this design trend will positively influence driving behaviour remains to be seen.

Ultimately, the choice to buy aggressive-looking vehicles reflects more than just a desire for size and power. Beneath the surface, customers may be seeking better roads, more considerate drivers, and a sense of control in a world that feels increasingly unsafe. These cars mirror the latent fears of their owners, who, like everyone else, want to feel secure on the road. People aren’t necessarily looking for predatory cars—they’re asking for safer environments.

Bhreehan Jairaj

Communication Designer | Experimenting with Design | Social Media Content & Brand Collaterals @ Schbang

6 个月

Question, does the exterior influence behaviour whilst there are softer design cues in the interior of the car? Sure, when crossing a road as a pedestrian I do feel unsafe by a fortuner, I equally also feel unsafe by a truck coming my way even though the rustic and colourful design of a truck has remained unchanged in the past 20 so years. While design has a role, in my opinion the heart of the issue remains at blatant disregard for road safety in society and lack of education and awareness. Empathetic looking cars might improve the psychological state of the driver, it still won't solve blatant disregard. I think a very recent example is the Porche incident at Pune, where arguably the car's design was sleek. It was the ignorance of the driver that caused the loss of two lives.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vansh Kumar Singh的更多文章

  • Freelance vs. Full-time - The Guide

    Freelance vs. Full-time - The Guide

    Designers are creative & social sensitive people passionate about solving problems, creating desirable futures, & our…

    3 条评论
  • Design for Opinions

    Design for Opinions

    Designing a product is a unique & intricate process. Not just for the designer, but for the organization as a whole…

    2 条评论
  • Designer vs. Design

    Designer vs. Design

    Recently, a peculiar thought crossed my mind. I was reflecting back on all the job descriptions & design requirements I…

  • Who is Design?

    Who is Design?

    Design as a profession has always been shrouded by ambiguity. Explaining what a designer truly does is often a…

    1 条评论
  • Innovators VS. Operators - Which one are you?

    Innovators VS. Operators - Which one are you?

    Innovation has over 60 definitions in various scientific papers. Broadly, it is recognised as the creation and…

  • The Immaturity of Design Hiring

    The Immaturity of Design Hiring

    Design hiring has evolved in ways we've never seen before. Some disciplines are experiencing historic booms, while…

  • The Digital Rise of Generational Demise

    The Digital Rise of Generational Demise

    As I grow older, striving to build a career and an identity, I often find myself imagining—perhaps even…

    3 条评论
  • An equitable understanding of UX

    An equitable understanding of UX

    Scrolling through my LinkedIn feed and engaging with my network of designers, it's clear that the supply of credible UX…

    1 条评论
  • Why Design Talent falls short

    Why Design Talent falls short

    If you're a designer, you've likely felt inadequate in some way at your workplace. While the organization you work for…

    2 条评论
  • Why Money needs Design

    Why Money needs Design

    It is not uncommon for fresh design graduates to feel completely oblivious to how money works. Design schools excel at…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了