Analyzing Code Coupling

Software code, like the foundation of a building, is layered with complexities, interdependencies, and complications. Architects of software must consider not only the immediate behavior of the code but its long-term scalability, adaptability, and maintainability. At the heart of this is the concept of coupling: how different parts of the code interact, depend, and affect each other.

A Mathematical Approach to Code Coupling

One of the seminal works on this topic, "Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design," was authored by Edward Yourdon and Larry Constantine in 1979. The book introduced the notions of afferent and efferent coupling, concepts rooted in graph theory. The idea is straightforward:

• Afferent Coupling: Measures the incoming connections to a code artifact, such as a component, class, or function.
• Efferent Coupling: Counts the outgoing connections from a code artifact to others.

Modern tools, designed to assess software structures across diverse platforms, leverage these mathematical metrics to dissect the coupling characteristics of code. These insights are valuable for restructuring, migrating, or merely understanding a vast codebase.

Beyond Basic Coupling: Abstractness, Instability, and Distance

Coupling is just the beginning. Other metrics refine our understanding of code architecture:

• Abstractness: This metric provides a ratio of abstract entities (like abstract classes or interfaces) to concrete implementations. By comparing abstract to concrete entities, it offers a perspective on the balance between theory and implementation. The formula for abstractness measures the ratio of abstractions present in your code

• Instability: This metric evaluates the volatility or fragility of a codebase. By comparing efferent coupling to the sum of both efferent and afferent coupling, it measures how likely a component will break upon change.

• Distance from the Main Sequence: This derived metric uses instability and abstractness to assess the architectural structure. It envisions an ideal relationship between the two. Software components closer to this line indicate a balanced relationship between the abstract and concrete entities and their inherent stability.

To visualize these relationships, imagine a graph where abstractness and instability are plotted. The "main sequence" line on this graph denotes the ideal blend.

Tools plot components on this graph, helping architects measure their distance from this optimal line. Points close to the line suggest well-balanced components. However, straying too far into either extreme brings its challenges:

• Upper-right corner: The?Zone of Uselessness. The code is so abstract that it becomes unwieldy and less functional.
• Lower-left corner: The?Zone of Pain. Dominated by implementation with scant abstraction, code here could be better and easier to maintain.

Several software analysis tools across platforms provide these metrics, aiding architects in the never-ending task of code optimization, especially when dealing with unfamiliar territories, migration challenges, or technical debt evaluations.

Analyzing Code Coupling with JDepend

As discussed in our article, Coupling forms the backbone of understanding intricate dependencies within your codebase. Delving deeper into this topic, we explore practical steps to analyze these dependencies using the powerful tool JDepend.

Step 1: Installing JDepend

JDepend provides an excellent platform for generating reports on package dependencies. Although the primary GitHub page offers an overview, the installation steps are somewhat nested within the documentation. Here's a step-by-step guide to streamline the process:

Create a directory for JDepend and navigate to it via the terminal:

mkdir jdepend_workspace && cd jdepend_workspace        

Download the latest major release:

wget -O jdepend-2.10.zip https://github.com/clarkware/jdepend/blob/master/dist/jdepend-2.10.zip\?raw\=true        

Set an environment variable for JDepend:

export JDEPEND_HOME="$(pwd)/jdepend-2.10"        

Adjust file permissions:

chmod -R a+x $JDEPEND_HOME        

Add the jar file to your classpath:

export CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$JDEPEND_HOME/lib/jdepend-2.10.jar        

Now, JDepend should be fully functional on your system!

Step 2: Generating the XML Report

JDepend provides multiple interfaces - graphical, textual, and XML. The XML output is the most beneficial for our purpose as it grants us the flexibility to generate various visualizations.

Run the following command to generate the XML report:

java jdepend.xmlui.JDepend -file report.xml <path-to-the-root-of-your-java-project>/build        

This command produces a report.xml file, which will serve as our basis for visualization.

Step 3: Installing JDepend-UI

To enhance our visualization capabilities, we utilize jdepend-ui, a JavaScript-based tool. This tool transforms the XML report into a comprehensive HTML page.

To install it:

Clone the jdepend-ui repository:

git clone [email protected]:ValentinaServile/jdepend-ui.git        

Navigate to the cloned directory and install the necessary packages:

cd jdepend-ui && npm install        

Step 4: Generating the Final Report

Having jdepend-ui at your disposal, let's generate a detailed HTML visualization:

Execute the following command:

npm run jdepend-ui <path-to-xml-report-file> <your-packages-prefix>        

You can just open the generated index.html in your preferred browser.

You'll be greeted with an interactive graph, where each dot signifies one of your packages. The diagram illustrates package dependencies, couplings count, abstractness, instability scores, and more, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of your code's architecture.

Conclusion

The analysis of software architecture, particularly regarding coupling, has evolved from a heuristic approach to a more structured, mathematical one. This transition, fueled by foundational works and modern tools, ensures that as software grows in complexity, architects have the instruments to keep it structured, maintainable, and efficient.

References