An analysis of time and information in relationships
Let there be two individuals A and B.
Life could be defined in Time as 1D and location-time in 2D
Time
The life of individual A is defined as a duration of T years, similar to B, but the value of T is a random number
Location
The life of individual A is defined as the location trajectory for a duration of T years.
This could be simplified as one location every year, therefore, as a trajectory, it is the forward movement of the individual from one year to the next. This movement could be assumed to be a digital signature of the individual. If this process is extended to every second, then the location trajectory will have a significantly large number of traceable location-time points, thus increasing the uniqueness of the individual.
Therefore, the definition of life could be defined in 2d as the trajectory of the individual .
( Location of the individual, time of observation ) . This could be defined on a graph as four variables ( X, Y, Z, t ) on a graph.
The higher the duration of observation, the higher the number of points that could be accumulated and the individual's behaviour could be regressed more accurately for the forward trajectories. This allows the individual to be forecasted forward in time by predicting his approximate location in the next few hours-days.
Relationship
Let there be a union of two individuals A and B. The definition of union could be defined as the following :
Since each individual life is defined as movement through time defined by the four variable coordinate ( X Y Z t )
The definition of a relationship could be simplified as :
Both individuals A and B move along the same coordinates.
This means that the individual location signatures of A and B are merged into one location trajectory. This implies tracing the location of one individual will provide information about the other individual automatically.
There would be enough points that are intersecting for the individuals in the relationship that could be used as a source of information about either of the individuals.
To illustrate,
Let A and B be in a relationship. If A has a corporate job and B has a retail job, they would spend 8-10 hours apart. The remaining hours are spent together. thus
Individual A has two location-time signatures :
Time spent with B - X hours per day
Time spent with himself - Y hours per day
X hours - The time that is spent with B is the relationship time, and they are likely to be in the same location for a few hours per day - This is the shared location-time signature for the relationship
Y hours - The time that is spent with the self is the time that is spent away from B and involves interactions with other individuals as part of day-to-day activities - This is the unique location-time signature of the individual.
For both individuals A and B, their location-time trajectory remains the same, this means their location-time trajectory will be the same for this duration.
Individual A and Individual B both maintain their unique identity in the Y hours that they spend independently, which may or may not include interactions with other individuals.
Conflict of interest
All unions or relationships are formed using a common umbrella intent:
Deception in this context could take any form, such as
misleading intent for the purpose of the union
misleading intent during the union
Suppose if the relationship or the union occurs for an umbrella intent, then it implies a set of rules or directives to ensure the umbrella intent is maintained.
These rules are called interaction rules :
The shared time X hours occurs under a defined set of behaviour expectations, that if broken breaks the umbrella intent and thus the union.
The unique time Y hours that is spent away from each other also includes a set of behaviour expectations, that if broken breaks the umbrella intent and thus the union.
In both cases, the interaction is bound to a set of directives/behavioral expectations such as :
Alignment with the umbrella intent that is the purpose of the union
Contradictory to the umbrella intent that is the purpose of the union
The contradictory behavioural expectations
When either individual A or B observes a contradictory behaviour pattern that is opposed to the umbrella intent, the interactions occur in the following ways :
Respond - Confronting the pattern
or
React - Any action that does not confront the pattern even if the other individual confronts the pattern. This usually involves interactions that produce a lot of negative emotions and loops into other behaviour patterns that have not been resolved, thus creating a spiral of attachment that is self-serving to both the individuals.
This is because the umbrella intent of the union transforms to induce negative emotions in either of the individuals.
Therefore, the shared X hours time per day for any average couple could be described as the following:
Y hours of time per day spent on reaction time ( a portion of X hours )
Deception
If the union is rooted in deception, Y hours could be engineered as low as possible or high as possible when needed.
To illustrate,
For any money driven union , Y is kept lower to maintain cash flow
For any sabotage-driven union, Y is kept as high as possible.