Analysis of Irish Tax appeals
I have been analysing a number of judgments published on the https://www.taxappeals.ie/ website. I have created a corpus of the ~630 determinations that I looked at and have been playing around with some key word in context (KWIC) tools to see what information I could extract.
I have used the information to create a targeted reading list of frequently referenced cases etc. which are often cited in the determinations. I found it interesting to read how often UK authority is quoted in the Irish tax appeals.
Some of my findings from the ~630 cases that I analysed:
·????????UK tax cases and arguments made by the UK tax authority, HMRC were mentioned in ~126 of those determinations;
·????????The First Tier Tax Tribunal (UK) decisions were quoted in ~63 determinations;
·????????The Upper Tribunal was quoted in ~17 cases;
·????????A total of ~450 decisions contained reference to Simon’s Tax Cases (“STC”)
There is, of course, a lot of Irish authority and certain cases come up frequently which is not surprising:
·????????Dunnes Stores v. The Revenue Commissioners [2019] IESC 50
·????????Revenue Commissioners v Droog [2016] IESC 55
领英推荐
·????????McNamee v Revenue Commissioners [2016] ESC 33
·????????Bookfinders Ltd. v The Revenue Commissioners [2020] IESC 60
·????????Revenue Commissioners v O’Flynn Construction Company and Others [2011] IESC 47
·????????Lee v Revenue Commissioners [IECA] 2021 18,
·????????Stanley v The Revenue Commissioners [2017] IECA 279,
·????????The State (Whelan) v Smidic [1938] 1 I.R. 626,
·????????Menolly Homes Ltd. v The Appeal Commissioners [2010] IEHC 49
·????????The State (Calcul International Ltd.) v The Appeal Commissioners III ITR 577
…
Note that the analysis was ‘quick and dirty’ and did not take into account where there were multiple judgments which were significantly similar from legal perspective with only a unique Appellant, e.g.?where there were multiple appellants involved in the same ‘scheme’ – This may, of course, skew the results.