Amino Acid- Inosine Wobble Protein Translation
Source: Genetic code and Amino Acid Translation
Well, folks, someone has been listening to me about the importance of the Inosine and Xanthine families.
The graph and charts of the Amino Acid Codons and Anti-Codon Wobble Pairing rules with the inosine family has been admirably put into print, much better than I could format it, but nevertheless, it shows Inosine = I in the anti-codon columns occurs 8 or 9 depending on the glycine controversy which has never been definitively settled.
Nevertheless, the current genetic code does “hedge its bets” by having synonymous codes i.e. having the first two codons the same, but varying the third column of the 21 amino acids. You will note in most instances, that Inosine wins in most cases, by measuring frequency of use by the tRNA gene in synthesizing the peptide bond and anti-codon binding amino acid. 9/21 = 3/7 = 42.85% of being selected in the third column.
I think we have done it. Now to test and validate. Please help me, I am not a bioinformatic wizard like many of you 14,000+ colleagues, especially in in-silico modeling. To be honest, I have not found a way around the current method to directly locate A to I mRNA post transcriptional edits without the AG proxy.
Currently, certain AG anti-codons are used as proxies for validated AI mRNA editing sites; the error is assuming the translation machinery, the next step in protein synthesis translates the final mRNA transcript as G uanosine and not Inosine.This is clearly wrong, from nature’s perspective.
The current sequencers have only 4 choices (AUGC= RNA code) in the coding scheme. It is inevitable G will replace I = Inosine since the sequencing machine has no Inosine code available. Common sense tells us G = NH2 + CO is not the same as Inosine = CO. And, a second error is naming Inosine as an analogue of Guanosine. They are clearly separate purine nucleotides, nucleosides and purine bases.
The extra NH2 of Guanosine makes a significant difference in the translational outcome, having an extra NH2 in the translated amino acid produces the wrong amino acid. The C=O makes water, NH2 makes NH3, ammonia, which is very toxic in the human body, especially the CNS and liver.
Another “scratching the head logic” in the central dogma coding schema, is the presence of the Inosine and Xanthine enzymes: IMPDH1,2 ; HGPRT, Xanthine Oxidase and Dehydrogenase, Inosine Kinase, PNP, cIMP, and many other enzymes just being discovered. My question is, if Inosine is replaced by Guanosine in the Translational phase of amino acid/protein synthesis, how are there any Inosine or Xanthosine enzymes? If Inosine is not processed by the ribosomal/ribozyme in translation, how are there any inosine/xanthine proteins down stream and down process?
I donot have the means to expand the reading,sequencing/decoding capabilities of the high throughput sequencers to process and visualize the inosine and xanthine codes. It will take “one of the big boys” like Illumina, to modify their machines to differentiate more than 4 codes in a single parallel read. The sequencing machine should have at least 6 or 7 codes to correctly identify the complete set of nucleotides found in the human genome. After all if only 3% of the 3.2 billion base pair sequences code for proteins, what do the other 97% of the nucleotide base pair code for?
It has been commonly accepted that 90-95% of all cells, undergo some type of mRNA transcriptional editing, and Adenosine to Inosine is by far the most frequent editing and alternative splicing type; this suggests, as more research is forthcoming, the inosine/xanthine families will be found to play a much bigger role in the genetic and epigenetic events and processes throughout the human genome.
Everyone, please reprogram your computers to duplicate the chart linked in the purple hyperlink, called Genetic Code and Amino Acid Translation. The 8/9 new Inosine anti-codon amino acids: (Alanine, Leucine, Serine, Threonine, Valine, Isoleucine, Arginine, Proline and Glycine); are many of the same amino acids found in the Heptad Alpha helix, the first and still most common protein motif found in nature today. The leucine zipper, serine/threonine kinase phosphorylation, and the proline kink, are a few of the more prominent functions of the Inosine Wobble Amino Acids.
These 8/9 amino acids are also the most frequent ones found in the “A” and “D” hydrophobic cores in the heptad alpha helix coiled coil structures, which are literally the anchoring forces binding proteins together at the highest order quarternary protein helices which underpin the most complex and sophisticated functions found in the human body, from pluripotent stem cells to human consciousness and the executive functions of the neocortex.
Founder @ Novagon DNA | Nucleic Acid, Genetic Programming
9 年This is beyond a "one person problem (me), it affects everyone on the planet and undermines the credibility of the entire genomic knowledge base. We are headed in the wrong direction. Not 180 degrees, but at least 2/7 or ~ 28% * 360 = ~ 103 degrees. If a course direction does not begin immediately, it will soon be point of no return. This is why I continue to assert, a Federal Level (NIH,FDA,DOD) etc. validation study is warranted of the current 5 nucleotide (ATGCU) vs. Novagon DNA's 7 Nucleotide (ATGCUIX) genomic code is immently needed. The current validity of the Watson-Crick 5 nucleotide genetic codes i.e. DNA = A1T1G1C1, RNA = A2U1,G2,C2 is 0.0000000.Not 1 of the 10,000 PDR prescription and over the counter drugs has ever been synthesized with no toxic side effects, killing ~ 100,000+ patients, and hospitalizing over 2,000,000 million others. If this is not bad enough, the omission of these two natural purine nucleotides makes it very difficult if not impossible for 1. faithful DNA replication, 2. CTD final mRNA transcripts, and 3. correct Protein synthesis and folding to occur. Am I the only one one the planet who sees this problem, or has a "massive Steve Jobs reality distortion field" been created by some type of "X files" life force which Molder and Scully would argue that we are "not alone- out their", or perhaps support many scientists view, including Dr. Francis Crick, that carbon based life began on earth from some type of extraterrestrial spore seeded by a comet or meteorite crashing into earth some 4-4.5 billion years ago. I will "hang up" now and wait for your responses.
Senior Scientist specializing in Metabolomics and R&D
9 年https://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2009/04/modified-bases-in-dna.html
Founder @ Novagon DNA | Nucleic Acid, Genetic Programming
9 年Dear Noel: Thanks for replying to my post. Technically, Inosine is a nucleoside not a nucleotide, the difference being the PO3- phosphate makes a nucleotide = sugar + phosphate + purine or pyrimidine base. Nucleosides only have the base + sugar, and dna and rna are nucleosides and make up the 64 codon, 21 amino acid central dogma genetic theory model. However, in sequencing single dna and rna strands only the bases are used. It is a bit confusing, and makes one wonder if sequencing purine or pyrimidine bases is the same as sequencing nucleoside and nucleotides (which are nature's natural molecular structure for nucleic acids = sugar + phosphate + base. In evolution the nucleotide with its three components was the first molecular structure made, and there were no free purine/pyrimidine bases like the nucleotide pool. Bases did not exist without being attached to a nucleotide and then a nucleoside, which I think is a big mistake. Photophosphorylation of serines 2, 5, 7 are the main drivers in the heptad 7 amino acid alpha helix, the first protein structure made by nature and found by man i.e. ironically by F. Crick and L. Pauling, who sued each other in 1953 over who discovered the alpha helix first.
Retired
9 年Read the paper "Never Mind" Emily Litella.
Retired
9 年Maybe I'm confused but isn't Inosine a Nucleic Acid?