By amending the claims and the title of the patent application, the distinctive technical features between the patent application and the citations ar

The examiner considers that the claims of the patent application do not involve an inventive step in view of the citations, and thus the patent application is unpatentable. Accordingly, TJIP amends claim 1 and the title of the patent application to emphasize that the distinctive technical features of the amended claim 1 are different from the citations. Furthermore, by replying that the technical features of the amended claim 1 are not disclosed by the citations and the amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, TJIP persuaded the examiner to grant the patent.

“For detail, please contact [email protected].

The article can also be read in www.jcpatent.com”