AMD SEV-SNP Vulnerability Allows Malicious Microcode Injection with Admin Access

Prepared by: Team Prudentbit?

Executive Summary?????

? Summary? : A critical vulnerability in AMD’s Secure Encrypted Virtualization-Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) feature allows attackers with administrative access to inject malicious microcode, bypassing hardware-enforced VM isolation. Exploitation could lead to hypervisor compromise, guest VM data theft, and lateral movement in cloud environments. Immediate patching of AMD firmware and hypervisor software is recommended to mitigate risks.???

Threat Overview?????

• Threat Name? : AMD SEV-SNP Microcode Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2025-XXXXX)???

• Type of Threat? : Hardware/Firmware Vulnerability (Privilege Escalation)???

• Threat Actor? : Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, state-sponsored actors, or malicious insiders.???

• Motivation? : Espionage, data exfiltration, cloud infrastructure sabotage.???

• Targeted Entities? : Cloud service providers (AWS, Azure, GCP), enterprises using AMD EPYC processors, government data centers.???

Detailed Description?????

Technical Details? :???

1. Vulnerability? : Flaw in SEV-SNP’s memory encryption protocol allows attackers with admin privileges to inject malicious microcode into the AMD Secure Processor (AMD-SP). This compromises the integrity of the Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), enabling decryption of protected VM memory.???

2. Exploitation Flow? :???

• Initial Access? : Attacker gains administrative access to the hypervisor (e.g., via credential theft or insider threat).???
• Microcode Tampering? : Injects malicious microcode via AMD-SP’s debug interface, bypassing SEV-SNP’s attestation checks.???
• Memory Decryption? : Alters VM memory encryption keys, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data (e.g., encryption keys, passwords).???
• Persistence? : Embeds backdoors in firmware to maintain access post-reboot.

3. Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs)? :

• Living-Off-the-Land? : Uses legitimate hypervisor tools (e.g., libvirt) to manipulate VM configurations.???
• Firmware Abuse? : Exploits AMD-SP’s firmware update mechanism to load malicious payloads.???
• Lateral Movement? : Extracts VM credentials to pivot across cloud environments.???

?

4. Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)? :???

• Log Anomalies? : Unauthorized firmware update attempts in hypervisor logs (e.g., AMDVTPM errors).???
• File Hashes? : Modified AMD-SP firmware binaries (e.g., SHA256: d4e5f6...).???
• Network Traffic? : Unexpected outbound connections from hypervisors to unknown IPs (e.g., 185.231.45.67).???

5. Attack Vectors? :???

• Compromised hypervisor admin credentials (phishing, brute-force).???
• Exploitation of unpatched AMD firmware in cloud environments.???
• Supply chain attacks targeting firmware update repositories.???

?

6. Vulnerabilities Exploited? :???

• CVE-2025-XXXXX? : SEV-SNP attestation bypass due to improper validation of microcode integrity.???
• Weak access controls for hypervisor management interfaces.

?

Impact Assessment?????

Potential Impact? :???

• Operational? : Full compromise of multi-tenant cloud environments; disruption of critical services.???
• Financial? : Data breach costs (average $4.45M per incident, IBM 2025); regulatory fines.???
• Reputational? : Loss of customer trust in cloud providers using AMD processors.???
• Regulatory? : Violations of GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA due to exposed sensitive data.???

? Affected Assets? :???

• Encrypted VM memory, hypervisor management systems, cryptographic keys.???

Mitigation Strategies?????

Preventative Measures? :???

1. Technical? :???

• ? Apply AMD firmware patches (version 1.1.8.0 or later).???
• ? Enforce Secure Boot and disable unused firmware interfaces (e.g., AMD DebugWire).???

2. Procedural? :???

• ? Restrict administrative access via Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA).???
• ? Conduct firmware integrity checks using TPM-based attestation.???
• Physical? : Isolate hypervisor management networks from general enterprise traffic.???

?

Detection & Response? :???

• Monitoring? : Deploy anomaly detection tools (e.g., Splunk, Elastic SIEM) to flag unauthorized firmware changes.???
• Incident Response? : Isolate compromised hypervisors; revoke exposed credentials.???
• Recovery? : Restore hypervisors from clean firmware backups; audit VM memory for tampering.???

?

Recommendations?????

Immediate Actions? :???

• Patch all AMD EPYC processors (3rd Gen and newer) with firmware updates.???
• Rotate hypervisor admin credentials and enforce MFA.???

?

Long-term Actions? :???

• Adopt hardware-based root-of-trust solutions (e.g., Microsoft Pluton).???
• Integrate firmware integrity monitoring into existing SOC workflows.???

?

User Awareness? :???

• Train IT staff to recognize phishing targeting hypervisor credentials.???
• Simulate firmware compromise scenarios in red team exercises.???

Additional Context? :???

This vulnerability mirrors past SEV flaws (e.g., CVE-2020-12967) but poses broader risks due to SEV-SNP’s adoption in confidential computing. AMD has partnered with cloud vendors to deploy patches, but on-premises systems remain vulnerable. The NSA’s 2025 advisory highlights increased APT focus on firmware attacks.? ?