Amazon’s New Return Policies Give Brick & Mortar a New Life
Richard R. Shapiro
Create an Emotional Bond from Day One | Customer Retention | Customer Experience | CSAT Survey Research | C-Suite Consulting | Leadership Speaker | AI & Human Connection | Self-Serve | Account Management | Author
It finally happened! It could be a watershed moment for retailers, but more importantly for the consumer. How so? The old adage, measure twice, cut once. Consumers can be more thoughtful and precise about how they order and how much. Amazon’s return policies allowed customers to make returns hassle-free. Now they are internally reviewing this process and cancelling accounts of customers who they say abuse the Amazon return policies. The Wall Street Journal was one of the first periodicals to uncover this policy. While the article didn’t publish any details about Amazon’s return policy nor obtain the percentages of customer “deletions,” I say it’s a good thing for brick & mortar retailers, especially those in the apparel business.
I consider myself a powerful advocate for consumer rights. I think every company should have an empty chair at the table (ironically, it’s Jeff Bezos’ standard operating procedure). But consumers have taken advantage of online retailers.
I’m not sure that easy returns make total sense. For the company selling the product, those easy returns frequently equate to zero or no profit. A couple of years ago, I wrote a blog about Macy’s return policy. It didn’t make sense. Customers could return almost anything without an end date. Macy’s recently changed their return policy to 180 days for most items which is probably still too liberal. I think companies should have a 60 day return policy; a fair amount of time in my opinion. Associates should be empowered to make exceptions, when necessary, after listening to the customer.
According to Instinet analysis led by Simeon Siegal, Amazon.com Inc. may already be the largest apparel retailer and could still grow to sales between $45 billion and $85 billion by fiscal 2020,
While I feel that Amazon’s new (recently disclosed) policy of monitoring returns needs to be carefully executed and fine-tuned instead of just closing a customer’s account with no explanation – that is not customer friendly – it was bound to happen. I know there are always consumers who will take major advantage of company’s policies and a negligible percent who border on criminal intent (only kidding). But, e-commerce companies, especially the giants such as Amazon and Walmart have most definitely encouraged customers to purchase more than they need.
It was a self-fulfilling prophecy. As Amazon sells more apparel than even Macy’s, it needs to rein in the propensity for consumers to be careless shoppers. The good news is that brick & mortar stores can go back to providing the best avenue for consumers to touch, feel and try on outfits before ever taking out their credit card. An added bonus and equally as important, a sales associate can assist the customer from beginning to end and provide a motive for that customer to return and shop again.
Do you think consumer abuse e-commerce return policies?
Strategic Business Advisor/ Merchant
6 年One has to wonder what the return rates are on subscription businesses as the info is never shared. Time to use “ data analytics” to keep your bottom line healthy and to maintain a customer relationship that works for all involved.
Create an Emotional Bond from Day One | Customer Retention | Customer Experience | CSAT Survey Research | C-Suite Consulting | Leadership Speaker | AI & Human Connection | Self-Serve | Account Management | Author
6 年Hi Bill, thanks for your comment and for letting us know about LL Bean's recent change. I totally agree with your statement. Richard
Intersectional Futurist. Best selling Writer. Non-traditional Strategic Planning businessman. Author of "Strategic Planning In This Age Of Disruption" and "The 4 Horsemen, Envisioning 2030" (Amazon #1 Business Planning).
6 年Interestingly, LL Bean's return policy just went from lifetime to "1-year". If there are no guidelines, there is no responsibility, and the next step is entitlement.