The Allure of Ideologies: A Comparison between Woke/Left Movements and Totalitarian Regimes

The allure of ideologies, whether they are woke and left-leaning or totalitarian in nature, often lies in their ability to tap into the desires and frustrations of individuals who feel disenfranchised or left behind by the status quo (Hunt, 1974). Both types of ideologies can promise to redistribute wealth, increase government control, punish the successful, and create a sense of community and purpose (Cassinelli, 1960).

However, the methods employed by totalitarian regimes to achieve these ends are often more coercive and destructive than the cancel culture employed by woke and left-leaning ideologies (Gentile, 2013). Totalitarian regimes often resort to forced confiscation of property, arbitrary punishment of the wealthy and successful, and a complete monopolization of power and communication, which can create a false sense of community and belonging (Hunt, 1974).

In contrast, woke and left-leaning ideologies may use more subtle tactics, such as emotional appeals and social pressure, to achieve their goals (Cassinelli, 1960). While these tactics can still be harmful, they are generally less severe than the outright oppression and violence employed by totalitarian regimes (Gentile, 2013).

Ultimately, the allure of both woke/left and totalitarian ideologies lies in their ability to offer individuals a sense of purpose, community, and retribution against perceived injustices (Rozado, 2023). However, the methods and consequences of these ideologies can vary significantly, with totalitarian regimes posing a much greater threat to individual liberty and democratic values (Hunt, 1974).

Woke ideology mask its true nature, as exemplified by critical race theory, which promote racial division, resentment, and the imposition of a radical hegemonic control over society. this becomes apparent is vilifying those who disagree, cancel culture, and the use of institutional power to enforce compliance. such as restricting free speech, reducing academic standards, and indoctrinating students through curriculum as well as encouraging social media and news outlets to hide or minimize evidence of events going against the woke ideology (Cassinelli, 1960). Totalitarian regimes, on the other hand, are more overt in their control and oppression, using the full force of the state to crush dissent and enforce their vision on the population (Gentile, 2013).? it is important to highlight that the woke end state could use the full power of totalitarian powers when it will become possible, by eliminating the balance of powers in a country like the US, by allowing for mass election fraud by claiming ID rules are discriminatory and by penalizing meritocracy (Rozado, 2023). these trends already visible and need to be vigilantly watched and opposed.

The question is why otherwise intelligent individuals are gravitating towards these dangerous ideologies, is that due to the human condition, which is always envious and frustrated by others success, why do the people who would like to see themselves as the heroes, are submitting to ideology which can create the most inhuman conditions with mass abuse, poverty, suffering (Arendt, 2018). people would like to think they would be Schindler in nazi Germany, in reality, the majority of these people will be nazis. the reasons why these ideologies are alluring and how to immunize against them is an area that requires deeper psychological and sociological study.

Perhaps all people were wronged in one time of their lives, and they see themselves as the weak, perhaps it is a simplistic doctorine which gives a clear cut path to their grievances, perhaps it taps into our innate sense of envy and resentment. Ultimately, vigilance and responsible leadership are necessary to guard against the dangers of totalitarian ideologies, whether they manifest as woke/left movements or outright authoritarian regimes (Stenner, 2005).

In Cuba, the case of left-wing totalitarianism is very clear: the Castro regime has maintained a tight grip on power for over six decades, using a combination of propaganda, censorship, and state violence to crush dissent and impose its vision on the Cuban people (Brzeziński, 1956). however, the promise was very alluring, no poverty, everyone will be the same, the government will ensure that this is happening, it did not start as totalitarian and vicious regime, only when the people gave away their power and arms.

Similarly, in Venezuela, the Chavez-Maduro regime has used the rhetoric of socialism and anti-imperialism to consolidate its power and enrich its inner circle, while impoverishing the vast majority of the population (Hunt, 1974). Here too, the initial promise of "21st century socialism" was appealing to many who were disillusioned with the status quo, but the reality has been a descent into authoritarianism and economic ruin.

There is really no logical reason to assume that the left in the USA will not lead to similar outcomes based on the trends being observed. The radical elements keep gaining more power and influence, while the moderates are being pushed out. take the North Korean regime, they also started with support of the people, who were angry at the system and wanted change, so they gave their power to the party.

These examples serve as a stark warning about the dangers of totalitarian ideologies, regardless of whether they are cloaked in the rhetoric of left-wing or right-wing populism. It is crucial for individuals to be vigilant against the allure of these dangerous ideologies and to support democratic institutions and the rule of law (Osborne et al., 2023) (Chouhy, 2022). people do not recognize how fragile true democracy is, how hard it is to maintain, and how easy it is to slip into tyranny. vigilance is key. it is also interesting that the left is blaming the right for authoritarianism, when in fact there are strong authoritarian tendencies on the left itself. in fact, there are more historical left wing totalitarian examples than there are right ones, this is because the right allure is more about maintaining status quo, while the left allure is about radical change, and people are more easily swayed by radical change. also, the Christian religion specifically is extremely mild, whilst Christians were responsible for many atrocities during the crusades, the religion itself does not preach violence, which is not the case with some interpretations of Islam. in the entire history of the western world, there was never a Christian leaning government who used Tirrany like the Catholic church did during medieval times or some Islamic regimes today. so while authoritarianism can exist on both the right and the left, the driving forces behind them and the mechanisms by which they manifest can vary significantly. whilst Nazi Germany was an authoritarian right wing regime, Pol Pot's Cambodia and Stalin's Soviet Union were authoritarian left wing regimes, each with their own distinct characteristics and dynamics (Osborne et al., 2023). even under that premise Nazi Gauthoritarianermany was not powered by religion, it had some mix of nationalism, anti-Semitism, and an overall fascist ideology. the Catholic church was a major enabler, but the Nazi ideology itself did not derive its power from Christianity in the same way that the Medieval Catholic church did (Kennedy, 2019).

statistically speaking, it is much more likely that left woke ideology will be an entry level drug to authoritarianism rather than republican party or Christian conservatives (Costello et al., 2022). the inherent desire for conformity, the punishment of those who defy the? in group norms, and the deference to self-appointed authority figures are all hallmarks of left-wing authoritarianism, even if the specific ideological content differs from the traditional right-wing variety (Osborne et al., 2023). history has shown us repeatedly that the road to totalitarianism is often paved with good intentions, and that the allure of a strong, centralized authority can be irresistible to those who are frustrated with the messiness and inefficiency of democracy (Saunders & Ngo, 2017).

In addition to that the left wing woke ideology is gaslighting the public to support extreme Islam who always perceived themselves as the underdogs, this is a dangerous combination that has the potential to spiral into authoritarianism and oppression (Osborne et al., 2023).

?

In conclusion (Osborne et al., 2023), while the allure of left-wing ideologies like wealth redistribution, increased government power, and a sense of community can be compelling, especially to those who feel left behind, it is crucial to be vigilant against the dangerous authoritarian tendencies that can lurk beneath the surface. The historical examples of left-wing totalitarianism in places like Cuba and Venezuela serve as a stark warning about the risks of giving too much power to the state, and the importance of maintaining a healthy system of checks and balances to prevent the abuse of that power.

?

References

Arendt, H. (2018, July 31). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Princeton University Press, 544-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.50

Brzeziński, Z. (1956, September 1). Totalitarianism and Rationality. Cambridge University Press, 50(3), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951557

Cassinelli, C W. (1960, February 1). Totalitarianism, Ideology, and Propaganda. University of Chicago Press, 22(1), 68-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126589

Chouhy, G. (2022, January 1). Explaining the Chile–Uruguay Divergence in Democratic Inclusion: Left Parties and the Political Articulation Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press, 46(2), 401-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2021.50

Costello, T H., Bowes, S M., Stevens, S T., Waldman, I D., Tasimi, A., & Lilienfeld, S O. (2022, January 1). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism.. American Psychological Association, 122(1), 135-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341

Gentile, E. (2013, December 16). Total and Totalitarian Ideologies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0035

Hunt, R N. (1974, January 1). Introduction: The Concept of Totalitarian Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02661-6_1

Kennedy, D. (2019, May 31). Authoritarian constitutionalism in liberal democracies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117852.00013

Osborne, D., Costello, T H., Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C G. (2023, March 3). The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism. Nature Portfolio, 2(4), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00161-4

Rozado, D. (2023, January 1). The Great Awokening as a Global Phenomenon. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.01596

Saunders, B A., & Ngo, J. (2017, January 1). The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale. Springer Nature, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1262-1

Stenner, K. (2005, July 25). Introduction: The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge University Press, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614712.001