Allied Health in the Era of Austerity: Challenges and Opportunities

Allied Health in the Era of Austerity: Challenges and Opportunities

As healthcare systems around the world face the pressures of economic austerity, the role of allied health professionals (AHPs) becomes increasingly crucial. However, despite our vital contributions to patient care, we often find ourselves on the chopping block during budget cuts. The underutilisation and undervaluation of AHPs in times of financial strain not only undermine the quality of care but also miss an opportunity to leverage our skills to improve outcomes and reduce costs.

The Financial Squeeze: Challenges Facing Allied Health

Over recent years, healthcare funding has become a battleground, with governments and other funders tightening their purse strings while demand for services continues to increase. For AHPs, this often translates into reduced visibility and recognition. Unlike doctors and nurses, who have well-established roles and often endorsed workforce ratios, AHPs frequently struggle to justify our place in the system when budgets are slashed.

Insurers, too, have been slow to fully reimburse allied health services. Despite mounting evidence that AHPs play a critical role in preventative care, rehabilitation, and chronic disease management, reimbursement rates remain disappointingly low. This lack of financial support not only hampers our ability to provide high-quality care but also discourages patients from seeking out services that could prevent more costly interventions down the line.

The Austerity Dilemma: Neglected or Cut

During times of austerity, healthcare systems often prioritise high acuity, visible needs, such as emergency care and surgery. Unfortunately, this approach can marginalise AHPs, whose contributions, while essential, are less visible to policymakers and the public. Previous survey data from allied health professionals suggests that in some cases, allied health services are explicitly cut, seen as expendable in the face of more "urgent" demands.

This short-sightedness ignores the long-term benefits that AHPs bring to the table. Whether it's keeping people independent at home for longer, diagnosing conditions before they become severe, expediting hospital discharges, or improving the outcomes of surgical interventions, AHPs are integral to a well-functioning healthcare system. Cutting our services not only harms patient outcomes but also increases costs in the long run, as patients who miss out on early intervention often end up requiring more intensive and expensive care later on.

Physiotherapist Dr Rachael Tucker completed her PhD on the effects of austerity measures in the NHS. She found that austerity measures reduced the ability of physiotherapists to deliver sufficient treatment and provide appropriate discharge support to patients, leading to longer hospital stays and an increased risk of institutionalisation of discharged patients.

Read the full article here.

This article is so well articulated Susan. I 100% agree with everything you said. We need GMs, CEOs and healthcare leaders to see the long game of healthcare to truly appreciate allied health. Optimising function and well being is what we do so well. Reducing hospital length of stay and preventing re/admissions saves the healthcare system overall. It’s difficult when we have a disproportionately low representation at the highest leadership levels as we need to double down efforts to educate, advocate and influence. And given the austerity measures we are facing, time is of the essence.

Ivy Bourgeault

uOttawa Research Chair in Gender, Diversity and the Professions and CHWN Lead

3 个月

I agree!

Sharon Mickan

Connecting people and ideas across the healthcare system to create practical impact

3 个月

Such a great opportunity to work together and create innovative practices….

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了