"All of our biggest problems begin at food waste and end at food waste prevention"- Food Waste Tax for a Sustainable Future"
Craig McIntosh
Designing sustainable, autonomous ecosystems that empower communities with water, food, and energy. I defy conformity and challenge greed. My mission: to disrupt the norm and champion community-driven sustainability.
Introduction: Navigating the Domino Effect of Societal Challenges
In over three decades of experience in food, systems, and technology, I've observed a striking domino effect in our societal landscape. This landscape, fraught with complexity, sees each action potentially triggering unintended, often detrimental consequences. A prime example of this is food waste, a multifaceted crisis symbolizing not only environmental degradation but also stark inequalities and inefficiencies in global systems.
My hypothesis posits that the genesis and resolution of our most pressing problems lie in addressing food waste. However, crafting solutions requires a holistic approach, considering potential ripple effects. It's essential to include diverse perspectives, especially those traditionally marginalized. While current systems may favor a select few, it's the collective will that holds the potential for true, inclusive transformation.
In the following article, I have attempted to highlight the problem of food waste, trace where it is cultivated, and propose solutions. I firmly believe that most of the world’s significant issues begin and end with food waste. My aim is to substantiate this belief piece by piece and provide a sustainable formula to solve it. In summary, while our problem-solving efforts can inadvertently create new challenges, particularly for marginalized groups, united action can foster comprehensive, effective solutions.
Let's get into Craigs head...
The Multifaceted Crisis of Food Waste Food waste is an issue that transcends mere environmental concern. It’s a glaring testament to the inefficiencies in our food systems, contributing to significant resource depletion – water, land, energy – and exacerbating environmental degradation. This wastage occurs alongside and in stark contrast to the widespread problem of food insecurity and malnutrition, affecting the most vulnerable in society, particularly children and the elderly.
The Harm to:
Natural Resources:
?Human & Social Implications:
Here’s an augmented reflection on this.
The Economic Dimension and Stakeholder Implications The economic ramifications of food waste are staggering, with global costs potentially reaching trillions. This not only impacts industries directly linked to food production and waste management but also ripples across economies, affecting every stakeholder from the largest corporations to individual consumers.
1. People:
Hunger Eradication: Considering the 1.3 billion tonnes of food wasted globally, that amounts to about 1.7 trillion meals. Dividing this by the number of people on Earth, it's as if every individual throws away 3 meals a day. So, for an average person, it's like discarding breakfast, lunch, and dinner every single day!
2. Planet:
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction: The emissions from food waste, equivalent to 4.4 gigatonnes of CO2, can be visualized as driving a car around the Earth 44 billion times. It’s like every person on Earth taking a car trip around the world six times a year! The water footprint for our wasted food, at 250 km^3, is immense. For every person, it’s akin to letting a shower run continuously for 145 days straight!
3. Profit:
Beneficiaries & Losers:
Beneficiaries: The numbers indicate that almost every sector, from agriculture and retail to the end consumer, stands to gain from a reduction in food waste. The Greedy Few: Those who've built businesses around the inefficiencies in our food system, such as certain segments within waste management or those who capitalize on food shortages, might see their profit margins shrink. The math is clear: the benefits of eliminating food waste are not just moral or environmental but also profoundly economic. In essence, every tonne of food saved from wastage translates to significant savings, better health, and a more sustainable planet. The numbers underscore the urgency of this global challenge.
Top 10 businesses that exist due to food waste, considered "waste management":?
What if we eliminate food waste? Pivoting businesses that are currently benefiting from food waste, top 10:
Businesses that thrive on food waste to support a sustainable model is crucial for a circular economy and prevent the solution from creating job and industry loss. Here's how we can adapt and repurpose these businesses to work toward the elimination of food waste and maintain their viability:
a.???? Community education: Expand scope to offer education on broader environmental issues.
b.???? Collaborative projects: Partner with businesses to drive sustainability projects that align with their core mission.
By integrating these new business models and expanding their scope, these businesses not only support the elimination of food waste but also establish themselves as pillars of a sustainable future. By understanding the depth and breadth of these businesses, we can appreciate the intricate web of industries spun around food waste. Addressing food waste isn't just an environmental or moral imperative; it has profound economic implications intertwined with numerous sectors of our economy.
Who creates most of the waste and why? Corporate practices that minimize the entry of perfectly good food into the market, mainly for-profit motives.
Top 10:
1.???? Controlled Production: Many companies intentionally limit the amount of food produced to create scarcity, thus driving up prices and increasing profits.
2.???? High Cosmetic Standards: Many Corporations set high aesthetic standards for produce, causing perfectly good food to be discarded if it doesn’t meet these appearance standards.
3.???? Date Labeling: Overly conservative date labeling can cause retailers and consumers to throw away food that is still safe and good to eat.
4.???? Exclusive Contracts: Some large corporations have exclusive contracts with suppliers, limiting the distribution of surplus food to other potential markets or outlets.
5.???? Promotions of Processed Foods: Some companies prioritize and promote processed foods over fresh produce, limiting the market for fresh, healthy foods.
6.???? Patenting Seeds: Corporations that patent genetically modified seeds can limit the types of crops grown, potentially reducing the diversity and quantity of food available.
7.???? Over-Packaging: Excessive packaging can lead to additional costs and waste, causing retailers to order less fresh produce.
8.???? Pricing Strategies: High pricing can limit access to quality food, making it harder for consumers to afford fresh and healthy options.
9.???? Controlled Distribution: By controlling distribution, companies limit the availability of certain foods in specific areas, impacting the overall food supply.
10.? Waste of Unsold Food: Some corporations dispose of unsold food instead of donating it, keeping it from reaching consumers in need.
Each of these practices, which often prioritize profit over sustainability or equity, have the effect of minimizing the amount of perfectly good food from entering the market.
Solution Part 1 - Waste Prevention
Exposing manipulations: in the food market and providing solutions to these issues is a multi-faceted challenge requiring effort from various stakeholders, including governments, organizations, and individuals. Here are some steps and strategies that could be taken to expose these issues and provide possible solutions:
?Exposing Manipulations & Providing Solutions:
1.???? Investigative Journalism:
·????? Employ investigative journalists to uncover and report on unethical and harmful practices in the food industry.
2.???? Transparency Laws:
·????? Advocate for transparency laws that require companies to disclose information about their supply chains, production methods, and business practices.
3.???? Whistleblower Protections:
·????? Ensure robust protections for whistleblowers who expose unethical practices in the food industry and provide them clear channels to go through so that the information they are exposing doesn’t get “lost” by potential biased media corporations or biased governments that may be working with the powerful lobbyist that fund their campaigns.
4.???? Consumer Awareness Campaigns:
·????? Launch campaigns to educate consumers about issues related to food waste, market manipulation, and other problems. This would take an organized and synchronized effort by the majority to post, reshare, and talk about. In addition, like any successful campaign it requires funding. I was once told that “the richest people on earth are philanthropist” let’s put that theory to the test.
2.???? Regulatory Reforms:
·????? Push for reforms to food labeling laws, ensuring that consumers have accurate information about food safety and quality. Part of our campaign.
3.???? Support for Local and Sustainable Agriculture:
·????? Promote and support local and sustainable agriculture to decrease dependency on large corporations that manipulate the food market. Vote with your dollars.
4.???? Food Redistribution Programs:
·????? Establish or expand food redistribution programs that divert food that would otherwise be wasted to those in need. Let’s get together. There are so many that do this, the challenge is that we don’t work together. Let’s form a round table and solve it together.
5.???? Technology and Innovation:
·????? Encourage the development and adoption of technologies that reduce food waste and improve food distribution. All impact companies need support and access to understandable grants and bursaries. Currently, start-ups are alone, grants are incredibly difficult to understand let alone to get.
6.???? Public-Private Partnerships:
·????? Foster partnerships between governments, non-profit organizations, and businesses to work together on solutions to food waste and market manipulation. Round table.
7.???? Educational Initiatives:
·????? Implement educational initiatives to inform consumers, producers, and other stakeholders about the importance of reducing food waste and ensuring equitable and sustainable food systems. Campaign.
8.???? Global Cooperation:
·????? Engage in global cooperation to establish international standards and norms for food production, distribution, and waste. Round table of those that are most underserved representing change initiatives, keep lawyers out of it.
By combining efforts to expose market manipulations with tangible solutions, it's possible to make significant progress toward a more equitable and sustainable food system. However, these changes require broad collaboration, sustained effort, and the political will to prioritize the needs of people and the planet over profit. In otherwards, it is hard. Then again, so is starving. Then again so is dealing with floods, wildfire, droughts and other environmental devastation and humanitarian criseese.
Solution Part 2
Where do we start?
Start at the Farm: It is indeed a matter of concern that many farmers feel trapped in a system that not only forces them to waste significant portions of their produce but also binds them into unfair contracts that perpetuate these wasteful practices. I know this because I’ve heard them say it to me and show me the contracts themselves. Here is what we came up with. Addressing these issues requires a multi-layered approach, emphasizing fairness, transparency, and accountability throughout the food production and distribution chain.
?Addressing Farmers’ Concerns:
1.???? Changing Aesthetic Standards:
Work towards the modification or elimination of unreasonable aesthetic standards for produce that lead to unnecessary waste. Farmers should not be forced to discard good food merely because it does not meet superficial appearance criteria.
2.???? Support and Protection for Farmers:
Provide farmers with adequate support and protection to ensure that they are not coerced into signing unfair contracts. Establish legal aid resources accessible to farmers to review contracts and negotiate fairer terms.
?Transparent Contract System:
1.???? Public Contract Scrutiny:
Introduce a transparent contract system for commercial food transactions. Making contract terms public allows external parties, including government entities and watchdog organizations, to scrutinize and evaluate the fairness of these agreements.
2.???? Government Oversight:
Ensure government oversight of contracts between farmers and buyers to prevent exploitation and ensure fair terms that do not contribute to unnecessary food waste.
The Solution Part 3
Food Waste Tax:
?Adding a food waste tax would indeed act as a potent mechanism to deter large corporations from practices that lead to substantial food waste. Let’s explore how these ideas could function in a real-world context:
领英推荐
1.???? Implementation:
Impose a food waste tax on companies that contribute significantly to food waste and loss, making it financially less attractive to engage in such practices.
2.???? Use of Tax Revenue:
?Allocate the revenue generated from the food waste tax to support farmers and food manufacturers, especially the smallholders. Provide them with resources, training, and technology to minimize waste effectively. Additionally, the fund can be used to incentivize farmers for reducing waste and adopting sustainable practices.
?Positive Impact of Food Waste Tax:
Here are some examples and aspects of how a food waste tax and restructuring can encourage ethical and responsible food processing and shipping:
1.???? Incentivizing Waste Prevention:
The financial implications of the tax would push corporations to revise their waste generation practices. This reassessment could lead to more sustainable and efficient operations.
2.???? Promotion of Local Processing:
A tax on waste would encourage companies to set up processing facilities closer to the source, promoting local economies and reducing global transportation emissions.
3.???? Stimulating Innovation:
Facing a waste tax, companies will be compelled to innovate, developing new technologies and methods for minimizing waste throughout the food production and distribution chain.
4.???? Enhanced Accountability:
A tax framework would enhance corporate accountability, ensuring that companies bear the environmental and societal costs of the waste they generate.
5.???? Supporting Sustainable Practices:
The revenue from the tax could be channeled to support and reward sustainable farming and production practices, thereby promoting a more equitable and environmentally friendly food system.
In essence, the imposition of a food waste tax and the shift towards localized processing could usher in a significant transformation in the food industry. This transition would lead to more sustainable, equitable, and efficient food production and distribution systems, benefiting both the environment and society at large.
?Progressive Tax System Summary:
?1.???? Scaled Taxing:
Implement a progressive tax system wherein entities that stand to gain the most from food waste and loss are taxed at a higher rate. This strategy discourages the financial benefit from wasteful practices and ensures that those contributing most to the problem bear a proportionate cost.
2.???? Directed Revenue Utilization:
Direct the revenue from these taxes towards initiatives that support farmers in reducing waste and promoting sustainable, efficient farming practices. This funding could be used for education, infrastructure development, and the provision of resources and technology to help farmers minimize waste. In addition, the Food Waste Tax can support start-ups and those looking to scale that are in the impact and sustainability space.
?Measurement and Benefits:
1.???? Measurement Systems:
Use the funds to develop and implement waste measurement and management systems for farmers, distributors, food manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers, insisting on them to track, analyze, and minimize waste more efficiently.
2.???? Rewarding Minimal Waste:
Offer financial rewards or tax deductions for those who successfully minimize waste, making it an economically sound choice alongside being environmentally friendly.?Introducing the Food Waste Tax: A Catalyst for Change Summary
The implementation of a food waste tax could serve as a pivotal tool for transformation. It has the potential to:
Allocating Tax Revenue: Addressing Underfunded Areas The revenue from a food waste tax could be a game-changer in supporting areas that are currently underfunded, leading to:
Widespread Impact on Stakeholders and the Environment The ripple effect of a comprehensive approach to food waste would benefit all stakeholders:
Policy and Innovation: Pillars of Change Addressing food waste requires a multi-pronged strategy, including:
Reducing food waste and implementing a food waste tax: would significantly bolster Canada's capacity to offer healthier, more affordable food options. The subsequent ripple effect would be twofold: a surge in healthier eating habits and a marked decrease in diet-induced ailments. Beyond just direct medical expenses, like those arising from cardiovascular issues, diabetes, and obesity, the indirect and societal repercussions of poor diets can be overwhelming.
Poor nutrition can translate to increased absenteeism at work or school, diminished productivity, reduced attention span, and even escalated rates of depression and other mental ailments. As of 2022, the economic burden of unhealthy eating patterns surpassed CAD 40 billion annually. Imagine redirecting these substantial funds to critical societal needs:
Solution Part 4
Moving Processing Closer to Source:
1.???? Reduction in Waste and Emissions:
By establishing processing facilities closer to the production source, food waste can be dramatically reduced. This proximity decreases the time and distance food needs to travel, thereby minimizing the chance of spoilage and degradation. It also curtails transportation emissions, contributing to a reduction in overall carbon footprint. Traditionally this was common practice until it wasn’t.?
2.???? Efficient Transportation and Reduced Packaging:
Efficient local processing ensures that finished goods, rather than raw ingredients, are transported, optimizing costs. By processing unwanted parts into valuable products, we ensure full utilization of what's grown. Not only are main products like juice profitable, but when processed aptly, components like skin, seeds, and pith hold significant value. Currently, a large amount of biomass, such as tomato vines, is wasted. This biomass which is 7X wasted more than food can be transformed into fuel, pulp, paper, carboard and packaging, among other uses. Moreover, local processing decreases the reliance on excessive packaging, reducing waste and benefiting the environment.
Job Creation by Processing Food Closer to the Source:
1.???? Employment Opportunities:
Moving food processing closer to agricultural zones often situated near underserved communities can create numerous jobs. From operations within the processing facilities to ancillary roles, local communities would see a significant uptick in employment opportunities.
2.???? Stimulating Local Economies:
This migration of industry closer to the source of raw materials could vitalize local economies, bringing in more consistent income and encouraging economic development in these regions.
?Managing Transition in Communities:
1.???? Mitigating Job Loss:
As facilities move, the tax and incentive system can be structured to ensure minimal disruption in communities where factories are relocated. Funds from the food waste tax and other incentives could be directed towards re-education and training programs for individuals impacted by these changes.
2.???? Repurposing Old Facilities:
Unused factories can be transformed into hubs for other industries such as technology, manufacturing, community centers, affordable HOUSING, small business incubators, hospitals, schools, and innovation centers. This transition ensures that no jobs are lost; rather, new opportunities are created, diversifying the local economy, and offering more sustainable and future-oriented employment.
??Broad Economic Impact:
?1.???? Job Diversification:
Beyond entry-level positions, this shift would generate a demand for a wide array of professional roles, including law, accounting, engineering, and more, further expanding the job market and providing diverse opportunities for local residents.
?2.???? Boosting Disposable Income:
An increase in local employment and diversification in job roles can lead to a rise in disposable incomes, spurring local economic growth and enhancing the quality of life.
??Long-Term Community Revitalization:
1.???? Wealth Dispersion:
By focusing on agricultural and food processing industries, wealth is more equitably dispersed, ensuring that those who have been foundational to our food systems can share in the economic prosperity.
2.???? Community Transformation:
The transitioning and repurposing of old facilities contribute to comprehensive community transformation, leading to enhanced infrastructure, increased access to essential services, and the establishment of new, thriving industries.
??Conclusion:
?By meticulously planning and managing the shift in food processing, not only is it possible to avoid job loss, but it’s also feasible to create an array of new employment opportunities in both the communities where processing is moved to and the communities where facilities are repurposed for other industries. This well-rounded approach ensures economic growth, community revitalization, and the creation of a more equitable and sustainable food system and job market. The cyclical benefits of this transformation resonate across various sectors, c here are four examples of what the savings from addressing diet-related costs (potentially exceeding
?In Closing
?Addressing Those Affected and Those Benefiting from the Current System:
??To Those Suffering:
We see and hear your struggles. The present system, marred by unreasonable aesthetic standards and unfair contracts, continues to disregard the labor and commitment of farmers and food producers. The devaluation and wastage of perfectly good produce based on superficial criteria is not just a loss to you but to communities and the environment. We recognize the urgent need to rectify these issues, to bring fairness, respect, and sustainability to every aspect of food production and distribution.
?To Those Benefiting from Its Loss:
While some may financially profit from the exploitation and waste perpetuated by the current system, it's crucial to understand the broader, detrimental impacts. The systemic issues in food production and distribution have repercussions far beyond immediate profit margins. They contribute to environmental degradation, food insecurity, and the destabilization of farming communities, the very backbone of our food system. We urge you to consider the long-term implications and join in the pursuit of comprehensive, fair, and sustainable solutions.
?A Call to Governments:
Governments wield the authority and resources to enact meaningful change. The adoption of fair aesthetic standards, protection for farmers, transparent contract systems, and a food waste tax are not only feasible but necessary. Oversight and accountability in contracts and support for localized, sustainable practices can revolutionize the food industry. Implementing a progressive food waste tax not only deters wasteful practices but generates revenue to further bolster sustainability and support farming communities. Governments must take the lead, ensuring policies and practices that prioritize the welfare of farmers, consumers, and the planet.
?Alerting the Unaware Public:
To the public, it’s crucial to be informed about the realities of food waste, unfair practices, and their sweeping impacts. Unreasonable standards and contracts contribute to massive food waste, which in turn exacerbates food insecurity and environmental issues. Understanding these challenges is the first step in advocating for and supporting necessary changes. Encourage local and national governments to adopt policies ensuring fairness, sustainability, and accountability in the food system. Support local farmers and sustainable practices, making choices that bolster a fair and resilient food industry.
?Moving Forward Together:
In the face of these challenges and opportunities, it’s imperative for all stakeholders - those affected, those in a position to make changes, governments, and the public - to come together. Collaborative effort is the key to transforming the food system, ensuring it is equitable, sustainable, and prosperous for all. Let’s unite in the pursuit of comprehensive solutions, championing policies and practices that honor the labor of farmers, protect the environment, and contribute to the well-being of communities worldwide. Together, we can cultivate a food system that nourishes not only our bodies but also our planet and future.
Conclusion:
By addressing the concerns of farmers regarding waste and unfair contracts and introducing a transparent, publicly scrutinized contract system, a fair and equitable balance can be achieved in the food industry. Furthermore, a progressive tax system ensures that entities benefiting from wasteful practices bear the financial responsibility for mitigating the impact of these practices.
This comprehensive approach serves to protect the interests of farmers, education, and impact businesses, promote the efficient and ethical production and distribution of food, and prioritize the welfare of the planet and its inhabitants over profit. Through collaborative and concerted effort from all stakeholders, including governments, organizations, and individuals, we can work towards a more sustainable and fair food system for all.
Designer + Copywriter + Video Producer + Marketer + Presenter
10 个月Craig McIntosh Please put me to work. So many of the points covered here need reporting. The problem of food waste is vast and, as you say, multifaceted. I've begun writing a series of exploratory pieces, looking at each point where waste happens in the broken food system. My most recent article looks at human behavior and the barriers to changing habits: https://open.substack.com/pub/cookiesandrobots/p/the-shock-of-the-renewables-deprogramming I fear that "awareness" is not enough. It's one thing to show consumers how much food is indeed being wasted, but it's quite another to actually motivate change in people's behaviors and lifestyles. There are many barriers.
Founder / CEO at ReFeed Farms
10 个月Craig McIntosh although I echo a great deal of what you write, placing a blanket tax on food waste I don’t believe is the answer…too many potential unintended consequences. The reasons for FLW throughout the supply chain are far too nuanced to have a blanket punative approach. Start with policy, ensuring food is used to highest value - feed people, livestock etc. Bring stakeholders together to align solutions that can be implemented at the scale of the problem - too many solutions competing works against solving the issue. Local/Regional solutions are required. I don’t think another tax is the way though.