All or Nothing Performance Type Contracts? Not as Many as You Think
Overview of Contract Types, which do not require Contractors to COMPLETE any scope in order to get allowable costs reimbursed by the Government (oversimplified):
CPFF Term - Contractor loses fee if ordered LOE is not delivered, all allowable costs are reimbursed up to obligated estimated cost ceiling. Negative CPAR Potential: level of effort was not provided timely
CPFF Completion - Contractor loses Fee if items are not complete, all allowable costs are reimbursed up to obligated estimated cost ceiling. Negative CPAR Potential: Contractor did not complete the scope on schedule; hence fee was not paid, hence the rating is below Satisfactory
CPAF - Contractor loses Fee if Award Fee evaluation per Evaluation metrics is unsatisfactory, all allowable costs are reimbursed up to obligated estimated cost ceiling. Negative CPAR evaluation, which could result: Contractor did not complete the scope to merit award fee; hence fee was not paid/reduced, hence the rating is below Satisfactory or other - Award Fee Evaluation mirrors CPAR in some ways.
CPIF – Contractor loses fee if target cost is exceeded within the contract period. No Completion. Must demonstrate Best Effort towards meeting scope objectives within period of time within estimated cost. The fee is not adjusted for performance unless the formula for target fee and adjustments is based not only on cost but also on performance incentives (multiple incentives arrangements FAR 16.402-4). All allowable costs reimbursed up to obligated estimated cost ceiling. Negative CPAR Potential: Contractor did not make best effort to complete the scope, e.g. [insert valid examples]. N.B. Hard to justify if the performance objectives did not include relationship between performance targets and fee. Fee may still get paid above target if costs are below target at the end of the contract.
T&M -No completion, Level of Effort. Disallowed costs if labor does not meet labor category quals. Negative CPAR Potential: level of effort was not provided timely and labor did not meet qualifications).
If you want to have a "Get Paid All or Nothing" performance contract, then Fixed Price/Unit Price is the way to go, but you must know precisely what you want and you must know precisely how you will inspect and determine acceptability (i.e acceptability criteria).
Change my mind!
International development professional with over 15 years of project management experience on USAID, UK Aid, and Sweden Aid programs across Latin America and the Caribbean, Europe and Eurasia, and South East Asia.
11 个月Hi Olga W.! It was nice to meet you this week. I have a follow up question please. On CPFF term contracts, are we held to LOE ceilings by year or by life of project? If we don’t use all of the LOE in a given year, does that LOE rollover to the next year automatically or does it require a formal modification? Thank you!
Senior Acquisition and Assistance Specialist and Trainer
5 年Interesting... as these are the types typically used for most cost reimbursable contracts in government( at least USAID)
COO | Director of Business Development | Director of Operations | Chief of Staff
5 年Yanikk Lewis