Is all mass relativistic?
If the Universe can be described as residing in the complex mathematical domain,* the Hubble Law would read
(1) v = Hs ......................................... (v>c)
where v is the relative velocity between two sufficiently separated galaxies, H is the Hubble Constant, and s is the distance between galaxies. Relativistic mass, m', of such a galaxy from our own was shown to be
(2) m' = -i m (v^2/c^2 -1)^-1/2, ........ (v>c)?
where v is the relative velocity, as in Equation 1. Solving Equation (2) for v, then eliminating it from the pair,
(3) m' = m [ (Hs/c)^2 -1]^-1/2
which could be the relativistic mass of the distant galaxy in terms of distance, s, between galaxies. This is curious, though, because relativistic mass, m', decreases with increasing distance. Conventionally, relativistic mass would be expected to increase with distance because of increased velocity. But recall, the mathematically real form of the relativistic mass equation was shown to be inconsistent with Equation (1), and discounted at the scale where the Hubble Law is in effect.
Then what could the meaning be of less relativistic mass with increasing distance?
领英推荐
If all mass is relativistic, let m = m', so that m'/m =1 in Equation (3),
(3') [(Hs/c)^2 -1]^-1/2 = 1
and given H = 70 km/s per Mpc, then s = 20 billion light years, about the order of the current estimate of 92-98 billion light years for the diameter of the Universe.***
_____________
* Letters, Dec 17, 2021
** Connection with quantum theory is shown subsequently.
*** https://www.space.com/24073-how-big-is-the-universe.html
https://futurism.com/how-can-the-diameter-of-the-universe-the-age
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe
Astronomía en House astronomy
1 个月COOL
Mgr. ve spole?nosti Physics, Astronomy, Nuclear Physics, Elementary particles, High energy physics
3 年Warren Frisina, Mass never depended on speed. It's just a wandering thought. Only the e / m ratio depends on the speed. [5] Ch. T. Perry, E.L. Chaffee : A DETERMINATION OF e/m FOR AN ELECTRON BY DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE VELOCITY OF CATHODE RAYS , Phys.Rev.36,904 (1930)? Kinetic energy according to Einstein and according the latest knowledge? https://vixra.org/pdf/1412.0125v1.pdf The main differences between Einstein's theory[1] and the latest knowledge[2]are: 1.Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is asymmetrical, 2. Form of the interference field is non-linear, 3. Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy of electron , (proton) Tkin id =mc2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in direction of motion of electron, (proton) where v is velocity of electron, (proton). Kinetic energy of electron , (proton) Tkin ad = mc2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of electron, (proton) where v is velocity of electron, (proton). These are the main differences between Einstein's theory and the latest knowledge.? [1] A. Einstein : Sobranie naucnych trudov v cetyrech tomach pod redakciej I. E.TAMMA, Ja. A. SMORODINSKOGO, B. G. KUZNECOVA, Izdatelstvo "Nauka", Moskva 1966 [2] L. Vlcek, : New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996, ISBN 80-85665-64-6. Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. – Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla , E 9 -13 September 1996 [3] F. Kirchner : über die Bestimmung der spezifischen Ladung des Elektrons aus Geschwindigkeitsmessungen, Ann. d. Physik [5] 8, 975 (1931) [4] F. Kirchner : Zur Bestimmung der spezifischen Ladung des Elektrons aus Geschwindigkeitsmessungen , Ann. d. Physik [5] 12, 503 (1932) [5] Ch. T. Perry, E.L. Chaffee : A DETERMINATION OF e/m FOR AN ELECTRON BY DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE VELOCITY OF CATHODE RAYS , Phys.Rev.36,904 (1930) [6] FIZEAU, M. H.: Sur les hypothéses relatives a l’éther lumineux. Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., 3e série, T. LVII. (Décembre 1859) Présente á l’Academie des Sciences dans sa séance du 29 septembre 1851. [7] KNOPF, O.: Annalen der Physik, Vierte folge, Band 62, 1920 :"Die Versuche von F. Harress uber die Geschwindigkeit des Lichtes in bewegten Korpern, von O. Knopf. p. 391 – 447 [8] KAUFMANN, W.: Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 19, Leipzig, 1906 Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth p. 487-552? Consequence. The main differences between Einstein's theory [1] and the latest knowledge [2] are: 1.Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is asymmetrical, 2. Form of the interference field is non-linear, 3. Kinetic energy of a charge moving at the velocity of v has two different values: Kinetic energy of charge Tkin id =mc2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in direction of motion of charge where v is velocity of charge. Kinetic energy of charge Tkin ad = mc2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of charge where v is velocity of charge. These are the main differences between Einstein's theory and the latest knowledge.
Professionista nel settore Ricerca
3 年Can my paper: The Doppler Effect according to complete relativity Phys. Essays 25, ( 315 ), Sept. 2012 be useful in the investigations about the cosmologic relativistic effect of all masses considered in the actual post? In fact in the considered paper we studied, in accordance with complete relativity, the Doppler Effect of an electron/positron pair ( formed by two e.m. standing waves considered in their incipient production of a gamma ray having an energy of 1.022 MeV in the reference system S' moving with the speed u in respect to the reference system S of the laboratory ) when the electron/positron pair goes away from the observer with the speed u. The maximum value of the wavelengths of the e.m. standing waves of the electron/positron pair ( in their incipient production of a gamma ray ) measured in the laboratory system S in consequence of the Doppler Effect, was obtained in corrispondence to the value: BETA = u / c = 0.5774 So in the considered paper we demonstrated the following: when an electron/positron pair goes away from the observer with the speed of light u = c, we will have to consider a blue shift; and not a red shift.