Aligning Profits and Value: The Connection between Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation

1. Introduction:

?Transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods or services transferred between related parties, such as a parent company and its subsidiary. When these related parties engage in cross-border transactions, it is important to ensure that the selling price of the goods is in line with the market price, known as the "arm's length principle."

?

To confirm that the seller's selling price is at arm's length when selling goods to a related buyer, transfer pricing comes into play. It helps to establish and demonstrate that the price charged for the goods is similar to what would have been charged between unrelated parties in a similar transaction. This ensures that profits are allocated appropriately among related entities and prevents tax avoidance or shifting of profits.

Customs valuation, on the other hand, determines the value of imported goods for the purpose of calculating customs duties and taxes. The connection between transfer pricing and customs valuation lies in the fact that customs authorities may scrutinize the declared value of imported goods and question whether it truly represents the arm's length price.

By aligning transfer pricing with customs valuation, companies can provide evidence to customs authorities that the declared value of imported goods is consistent with the arm's length principle. This helps to avoid disputes and penalties related to customs duties and taxes, ensuring compliance with international trade regulations and promoting fair trade practices.

?2. The Main Purpose of the TP Methods:

The main purpose of various transfer pricing methods is to ensure that the prices or profits between related parties are in line with the arm's length principle. The arm's length principle states that the prices or profits should be similar to what would have been agreed upon by unrelated parties in a similar transaction under similar circumstances.

?3. Considering some TP Methods:

Transfer pricing methods in the transfer pricing policy document help prevent price manipulation by providing guidelines on how to determine fair prices for transactions between related entities. Here is a simple explanation of how these methods work:

3.1. Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method: This method compares the price of a transaction between related entities with the price of a similar transaction between unrelated parties. By using this method, we can ensure that prices are not manipulated and are similar to what unrelated parties would agree upon.

3.2. Resale Price Method (RPM): This method looks at the price at which a product is sold by a related entity to an unrelated customer. It then deducts a reasonable profit margin to determine the appropriate price for the transaction. This prevents price manipulation by ensuring that the profit margin is fair and not artificially inflated or reduced.

3.3. Cost Plus Method (CPM): This method considers the cost incurred by a related entity to produce a product or provide a service. It adds a reasonable profit margin to the cost to determine the appropriate price for the transaction. By using this method, we can ensure that the price reflects the actual cost and includes a fair profit.

3.4. Profit Split Method: This method divides the overall profits between related entities based on their respective contributions to the value creation process. It considers factors such as functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by each entity. The profit split method is commonly used when it is difficult to determine the contribution of each entity separately.

3.5. Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM): TNMM compares the net profit margin earned by the tested party (related entity) in a controlled transaction with the net profit margin earned by independent entities engaged in similar transactions. It determines the arm's length price by applying a profit margin to an appropriate base (e.g., sales, costs, or assets) of the tested party.

3.6. Transactional Profit Split Method: This method allocates profits between related entities based on the division of economically significant risks and contributions. It considers the functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by each entity. The objective is to determine the profits that each entity would have earned if they had dealt independently in comparable transactions.

?

These transfer pricing methods help prevent price manipulation by providing objective criteria for determining prices. They compare prices with those of unrelated parties and consider costs and profit margins to ensure fairness. By using these methods, we can avoid situations where prices are artificially inflated or reduced to manipulate profits or tax liabilities.

?

4. Common TP/Customs Risks:

When reviewing a transfer pricing policy document to confirm that the selling prices of goods for customs valuation are at arm's length, there are several red flag risks to watch out for. These risks may indicate potential non-compliance with transfer pricing regulations and could raise concerns for Customs Authorities. Here are some of the most common red flags to consider:

?

4.1. Lack of documentation: If the transfer pricing policy document is incomplete or lacks detailed documentation, it may indicate a lack of transparency or insufficient evidence to support the arm's length pricing.

4.2. Inconsistent comparables: If the document does not provide clear guidelines on selecting comparable transactions or companies for benchmarking purposes, or if the chosen comparables are not appropriate, it may raise doubts about the accuracy of the pricing methodology.

4.3. Limited functional analysis: A transfer pricing policy document should include a thorough analysis of the functions performed, risks assumed, and assets employed by each related party involved in the transaction. If the document lacks a comprehensive functional analysis, it may suggest a lack of understanding of the value creation process.

4.4. Significant price deviations: If the selling prices of goods in related party transactions deviate significantly from the prices in comparable transactions between unrelated parties, it may indicate a potential transfer pricing manipulation to shift profits or avoid customs duties.

4.5. Lack of contemporaneous documentation: Transfer pricing regulations in many jurisdictions require the preparation of contemporaneous documentation, which means that the documentation should be prepared before the tax return filing deadline. Failure to have up-to-date and timely documentation may raise suspicions about the arm's length nature of the pricing.

4.6. Inadequate transfer pricing methods: If the transfer pricing policy document does not use appropriate methods or does not provide a clear justification for the chosen method, it may raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the pricing determination.

4.7. Inconsistent policies across related parties: If the transfer pricing policy document shows inconsistencies in pricing policies or methodologies applied across different related party transactions, it may indicate a lack of consistency and adherence to arm's length pricing principles.

?

It is important to note that the presence of these red flags does not necessarily mean non-compliance or wrongdoing, but they do indicate areas that require further scrutiny and explanation to ensure compliance with transfer pricing regulations and customs valuation rules.

?

5. Customs Professionals Testing the Selling Price of Goods sold by a Related Party:

Customs professionals test whether a transfer pricing method confirms arm's length principles through a process called a transfer pricing analysis. This analysis involves comparing the transfer prices or profits of related party transactions with those of comparable transactions between unrelated parties. The customs professionals gather relevant data and information, such as financial statements, market research, industry benchmarks, and economic analysis, to assess whether the chosen transfer pricing method aligns with the arm's length principle.

The key steps in testing whether a transfer pricing method confirms arm's length principles include:

?

6.1. Gathering information: Customs professionals collect data on the controlled transaction, such as the nature of the transactions, contractual terms, and financial information.

6.2. Identifying comparable transactions: Customs professionals identify comparable transactions between unrelated parties that are similar to the controlled transaction. This involves considering factors such as product similarity, market conditions, functions performed, risks assumed, and contractual terms.

6.3. Comparability analysis: Customs professionals conduct a detailed analysis of the comparable transactions to determine their similarity to the controlled transaction. This analysis may involve adjustments to account for any differences between the controlled and comparable transactions.

6.4. Application of transfer pricing method: Customs professionals apply the chosen transfer pricing method to determine the arm's length price or profit. The method selected should be the most appropriate based on the available data and the specific characteristics of the transactions.

6.5. Documentation and justification: Customs professionals document the analysis, including the selection of the transfer pricing method and any adjustments made. This documentation serves as evidence to support the arm's length nature of the transfer pricing arrangement.

6.6. Limited functional analysis: Customs professionals should check whether the organization’s functional analysis described in the transfer pricing document is comprehensive. A limited functional analysis refers to an insufficient or incomplete analysis of the functions, assets, and risks of related parties. This can result in an inaccurate determination of an arm's length price. A comprehensive functional analysis is crucial for establishing an accurate price by considering the activities, responsibilities, and contributions of each party, as well as the value creation and risks involved. It enables the identification of comparable transactions and appropriate transfer pricing methods.

?

Overall, the testing process aims to ensure that the chosen transfer pricing method produces results that are consistent with the arm's length principle and can be justified based on sound economic and commercial analysis.

?

7. Considering Adjustments:

Advance payment adjustments and retroactive payment adjustments are concepts within the context of transfer pricing methods used to determine an arm's length customs value.

?

7.1. Advance Payment Adjustments:

When an importer makes an advance payment to a foreign supplier for goods or services, there is a risk that the actual transaction value may differ from the initial payment due to various factors like changes in exchange rates, market conditions, or other unforeseen circumstances.

Advance payment adjustments are made to account for these differences. This adjustment ensures that the customs value reflects the actual value of the imported goods or services at the time of importation, rather than the initial payment made.

7.2. Retroactive Payment Adjustments:

Retroactive payment adjustments, on the other hand, are made when the final price of the imported goods or services is determined after the importation has taken place. This may happen due to various reasons such as changes in the terms of the transaction, discounts, or rebates provided by the supplier.

Retroactive adjustments are made to ensure that the customs value aligns with the actual price paid for the imported goods or services.

In terms of customs compliance for the importer, both advance payment adjustments and retroactive payment adjustments are used by importers.

Advance payment adjustments offer better customs compliance when:

·??????? The importer has made an advance payment and wants to ensure that the customs value reflects the actual value of the goods or services at the time of importation.

·??????? There is a significant time gap between the advance payment and the importation, during which the value of the goods or services may have changed.

?

Retroactive payment adjustments may not offer better customs compliance since many customs legislations require that, at the time of import, the actual price of the goods should be declared to the Customs Authority. With retroactive payment adjustments the final price of the imported goods or services is determined after the importation has taken place and as a result, the original customs declaration will have to be amended to increase or decrease the customs value depending on whether the importer receives a credit or debit note from the seller. The adjustment may also bring about an increase in the customs duty and trigger customs penalties and interest since the original customs declaration may have resulted in to little customs duty being paid to the Customs Authority

?

8. Conclusion:

The connection between transfer pricing and customs valuation is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. The key issue when determining whether a related party's selling price of goods is at arm's length is to ensure that the price reflects the fair market value that would have been agreed upon by unrelated parties in similar circumstances.

?

Transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods, services, or intangibles in transactions between related parties, such as a parent company and its subsidiary. Customs valuation, on the other hand, involves determining the value of imported goods for the purpose of assessing customs duties and taxes.

?

The challenge arises when these two concepts intersect, as Customs authorities need to ensure that the declared value for customs purposes is not influenced by transfer pricing arrangements that may artificially deflate or inflate the value of goods.

?

The key issue in this complex matter is to establish whether the related party's selling price of goods is in line with the arm's length principle. The arm's length principle requires that the pricing between related parties should be comparable to the pricing between unrelated parties in similar circumstances. This ensures that the declared value for customs purposes accurately reflects the fair market value of the goods.

?

To determine whether the related party's selling price of goods is at arm's length, a thorough analysis of the transfer pricing policy document is crucial. It is important to review the documentation for red flags, such as lack of documentation, inconsistent comparables, limited functional analysis, significant price deviations, lack of contemporaneous documentation, inadequate transfer pricing methods, and inconsistent policies across related parties.

?

By addressing these red flags and ensuring compliance with transfer pricing regulations and customs valuation rules, businesses can mitigate the risk of non-compliance and potential disputes with customs authorities. A comprehensive and well-documented transfer pricing policy, supported by appropriate methodologies and analysis, is essential to demonstrate the arm's length nature of the related party's selling price of goods and maintain a transparent and compliant approach to both transfer pricing and customs valuation.

?

Dr. Rodrick (Ronnie) van Rooyen

PD International Business and Trade

PhD Maritime and Customs Management